diced b Jos e S. Arc a, - non

85. Carlos Ma. de la Torre, Manifiesto al pats sobre los sucesos deCavite, y Memoria sobre la administracion y gobierno de las islas Filipinas(Madrid, 1872), vii.86. Libro de cartas de Espana, fol. 132.87. Letter of Benito Romero de Madridejos to Vicente del Moral,Obando, 13-March, 1870: Libro de cartas de Espana, fol. 153. The Spanish isnot clear: "Cuando Rego este general hubo algunos recelos de que algunostienen quehacer [sic], pero despues vieron los que toleran [tuvieran?]intenci6n de crear disgusto a S. E. aqui lo que a todo lance cree convenientees sostener la recta moralidad y el principio de autoridad, asi es que bajo estosprincipios se marcha bien."88. The Governor to the Provincial, Manila, 6 September 1869: AFIO,219/51, and in Libro de gobierno, fols. 291-292.89. The Governor to the Provincial, Manila, 23 November 1869: AFIO,219/5-1.90. Libro de gobierno, fol 293.91. The entire expedient is in AFIO, 219/5. Following the sameapproach, but for different reasons, de la Torre also exiled a secular priest, D.Salvador Martin Amedo, from the Philippines. See Jose S. Arcilla, S. J. "TheExile of a Liberal in 1879, or Fr. Amedo's Case," Philippine Studies 19(1971) 373-419.92. The Governor to the Provincial, Manila, 1 August 1879: Libro degobierno, fols 304-305; AHN, Ultramar, 5152.93. The Provincial to Vicente del Moral, Manila, 31 December 1870:Libro de cartas de Espana, fol. 178.94. The Provincial to del Moral, Manila, 1 May 1871: Loc. cit., fol. 180.95. The Provincial to Gregorio Aguirre, 14 March 1871: Loc. cit., fol.183.96. de la Torre, Manifiesto, 8-9. After some kind of narrative describingthe demonstration organized by the most progressive elements in thePhilippines to manifest their joy at de la Torre's appointment, El Eco Filipino(17 October 1871) expressed disillusionment over the way de la Torregoverned, since it did not correspond to their expectations. On 14 November,296