13.07.2015 Views

zoonoses and communicable diseases common to ... - PAHO/WHO

zoonoses and communicable diseases common to ... - PAHO/WHO

zoonoses and communicable diseases common to ... - PAHO/WHO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ENTEROCOLITIC YERSINIOSIS 129mates that outside Great Britain there have been 27 cases of septicemia caused byblood transfusion, 17 of them fatal. One case of au<strong>to</strong>logous transfusion has also beendescribed (Richards et al., 1992).The mode of transmission is not well known either, but it is widely accepted thatthe infection is contracted by ingestion of contaminated foods, as in the case of otherenterobacterial <strong>diseases</strong>, as well as by contact with carrier animals <strong>and</strong> by human<strong>to</strong>-humantransmission. It is known that Y. enterocolitica can multiply at refrigerationtemperature. It is believed that this led <strong>to</strong> the 1982 epidemic in the US (see thesection on occurrence in man) produced by recontaminated pasteurized milk. Thisepidemic also reveals that serotypes other than 3, 5, 8, <strong>and</strong> 9 can give rise <strong>to</strong> the disease,although less <strong>common</strong>ly.Role of Animals in the Epidemiology of the Disease: Although not providingdefinitive proof, the accumulated data in countries with a high incidence of thehuman disease indicate that swine are probably an important reservoir of Y. enterocolitica,particularly serotype O:3, which is currently the prevalent type, <strong>and</strong> typeO:9, which is also frequent in swine. The disease caused by a dish prepared with pigintestines (“chitterlings”) in various American cities is good evidence that the infectionis transmitted through food.Diagnosis: In cases of enteritis, appendicitis, erythema nodosum, <strong>and</strong> reactivearthritis, the possibility of Y. enterocolitica infection should be considered. Theagent can be isolated from the patients’ feces. MacConkey agar <strong>and</strong> a selective agarcalled cefsulodina irgasan novobiocin (CIN), created specifically for Yersinia, canbe used for this purpose. Both biotype <strong>and</strong> serotype should be identified. The coldenrichment technique is useful, particularly in the case of carriers that may excretefew Y. enterocolitica cells. Samples are suspended in pep<strong>to</strong>ne culture broth or abuffered phosphate solution for 3 <strong>to</strong> 7 days at 4°C <strong>to</strong> encourage the growth of Y.enterocolitica <strong>and</strong> suppress that of other bacteria. However, routine diagnosis is animpractical procedure, takes a long time (about 1 month), <strong>and</strong> does not exclude nonpathogenicYersinia.Tube serum agglutination <strong>and</strong> the ELISA test can be used with good results asadditional diagnostic techniques. Active infections produce high titers that declineover time. Serum agglutination titers of 1/40 <strong>to</strong> 1/80 are rare in healthy individuals,but <strong>common</strong> in yersiniosis patients <strong>and</strong> can rise <strong>to</strong> very high titers. Positive cultureswithout clear evidence of gastroenteritis are not always accompanied by a highserum agglutination titer.Very high titers are <strong>common</strong> in patients with acute appendicitis (Schiemann, 1989).In countries where serotype 9 is a frequent pathogen for man <strong>and</strong> is also harbored byswine, cross-reaction between Brucella <strong>and</strong> that serotype may cause difficulties.Antibodies in swine against serotype 9 of Y. enterocolitica can be differentiatedfrom those against Brucella by flagellar antigens, which Y. enterocolitica has <strong>and</strong>brucellae do not. Y. enterocolitica also possesses the <strong>common</strong> enterobacterial antigen,which Brucella does not have <strong>and</strong> which therefore may also be used <strong>to</strong> distinguishthem (Mittal et al., 1984). Other animals that have been exposed <strong>to</strong> serotype9 can also show cross-reactions with Brucella.A comparison of three tests for serum diagnosis of type O:3 (immunoelectrophoresis,ELISA, <strong>and</strong> agglutination) produced similar results in terms of sensitivity<strong>and</strong> specificity (Paerregaard et al., 1991).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!