number of researchers is relative to the population of eachcountry. Data used for full-time equivalent (FTE)researchers suggest a global average of somewhat morethan 1000 researchers per million inhabitants. In developedcountries, the number stands at more than 3600, while indeveloping countries (excluding LDCs), the number standsat just over 500 and in the LDCs, this indicator does notreach 50 496 . However, it will be seen below that theamount of investment in R&D does not correlate closelywith the number of researchers.6.2. Least developed countries6.2.1. Istanbul Programme of Action (IPoA)LDCs represent the poorest and most vulnerable group ofcountries, and as a group they have made the leastprogress of all developing countries in achieving theMDGs 497 . They are characterized by weak, fragile andvulnerable economies. Their trade and developmentchallenges and difficulties are further exacerbated by theirexposure to disruptive environmental shocks, climatechange and natural disasters. Expected climatic changeswill have adverse impacts on and ramifications for thesecountries’ water resources, agricultural production,biodiversity, living conditions in human settlements, as wellas trade and transport infrastructure.The international community has been paying specialattention to LDCs through dedicated 10-year programmesof action to provide differential treatment to this specificgroup of countries since the early 1980s. These areexclusively targeted to LDCs, with a view to fosteringsustained economic growth and structural transformationand thereby reducing inequality between LDCs and the restof the world.For the last one and a half decades, the MDGs served as thekey guiding principles for international developmentFigure 6-3. Areas of emphasis of IPoA in the context of the SDGscooperation in LDCs. Since the MDGs are highly focused onthe social sectors, global attention was naturally tailored tothese areas. Science and technology and their relationshipwith the productive sector often remained at the peripheryof the development strategyThe Istanbul Programme of Action (IPoA), adopted at theFourth United Nations Conference on LDCs in 2011, is anambitious document that sets a target of enabling half thenumber of LDCs to meet the criteria for graduation by2020. It includes eight priority areas for action: (1)productive capacity, (2) agriculture, food security and ruraldevelopment, (3) trade, (4) commodities, (5) human andsocial development, (6) multiple crises and other emergingchallenges, (7) mobilizing financial resources fordevelopment and capacity building, and (8) goodgovernance at all levels.6.2.2. The Istanbul Programme of Action and the SDGsComparing the SDGs and the IPoA, it can be seen that IPoApriorities are covered in full and share a number of targetsin common with the SDGs. The objectives, priorities, goalsand targets of the IPoA are more targeted and specific aswell as comprehensive in the areas of special focus to LDCs(hunger, with special emphasis on agriculture; genderequality; energy; infrastructure; industrialization;innovation and trade; climate change; and means ofimplementation) (see Figure 6-3).In addition to the quantitative indicators proposed for theeight priority areas and for the first objective of theProgramme of Action, qualitative information is also usedto monitor the rate of progress in achieving the goals andtargets. 498 It is important that existing indicators and dataare taken into consideration and incorporated into theSDGs and the Post-2015 Development Agenda, to enablecoordination of monitoring and implementation.Source: Author’s elaboration108
6.2.3. Relevant publications for LDCsAnalysis of a sample of publications focusing on LDCsundertaken for this report shows ample coverage of thefirst nine proposed SDGs. By contrast, the other SDG areasare sporadically covered and SDG 14 was not covered inFigure 6-4. Coverage of SDG areas by a sample of publicationsany of the reports analysed (see Table 6-3 in Annex 1).Among publications addressing SDG areas, most areconcentrated on social issues, with the exception of SCPand climate change, reflecting the emphasis of the existingMDG framework. Few publications cover the science-policyinterface per se, its organisation and effectiveness.Source: Author’s elaborationNote: Coverage of SDG areas by a sample of 35 publications on LDCs6.2.4. The science-policy interface in LDCsIt is widely recognized that there is a dearth of studies onthe SPI in developing countries, and this is especially truefor the LDCs 499 . Nevertheless, research on LDCs’ science,technology and innovation (STI) systems supports theconclusion that, in these countries, SPI is beset bystructural and institutional deficiencies on both sides of theinterface (i.e. both the science and the policymaking).Indeed, SPI cannot be assessed without examining the stateof STI in LDCs.According to UNCTAD, the STI system of the LDCs hassuffered from a long-term neglect since the inception ofstructural adjustment programmes starting in the late1980s, which aimed inter alia to reduce the economic roleof the state to that of market regulation. 500 In this context,STI fell back in the order of priorities of LDCs 501 . This led tothe weakening of STI institutions, including universities,research centres, laboratories, and extension services 502 .Nevertheless, some science and technology-related areashave been addressed in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers(PRSPs), notably initiatives aimed at agricultural researchand agricultural extension; expanding technical andvocational education; and extending and upgradingelectricity networks. Many PRSPs acknowledge theimportance of improving telecommunications networksand access to ICT.STI programmes and activities are the responsibility ofministries of science and technology, who often focus moreon technology than science, specifically where theexpansion of telecommunications is a priority. In manycountries, there tends to be very little interaction amongacademia, government and industry. 503The volume of expenditure in the area of R&D has a greatimpact on the level of scientific capacity of a country. Yetinvestment in research in LDCs is persistently low,especially in Africa, as is the number of researchers andtechnicians. Many African LDCs are struggling to meet theAfrican Union goal of spending 1% of GDP on R&D.Research and development expenditure as a percentage ofGDP has stagnated at nearly zero in most LDCs. Thus, eventhose who spent the most on R&D, such as Mali (0.66%),Ethiopia (0.61%) and Uganda (0.56%) have not reached 1per cent 504 .It is interesting to note that the amount of investment inR&D does not correlate with the number of researchers inthese countries. Thus, Senegal who has the highestproportion of full-time researchers in LDCs (361 per millionof inhabitants) is only fourth in R&D investment (0.54% ofGDP), while Mali, with the highest investment in R&D perunit of GDP, is only 13 th with only 13 researchers per millionof inhabitants. 505 This merits further research.Many of the concerned countries have decided toconcentrate their S&T policies on education initiatives;however, the problem of brain drain persists and, givenlocal conditions, researchers from the diaspora may or maynot return home, but circular migration is increasing 506 .109
- Page 1 and 2:
GLOBAL SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT REPOR
- Page 3:
ForewordIn September 2015, world le
- Page 6 and 7:
3.1. Interlinked issues: oceans, se
- Page 8 and 9:
7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 10 and 11:
Box 5-10. Operationalizing inclusiv
- Page 12 and 13:
Figure 8-8. Location of ambulance u
- Page 14 and 15:
Hentinnen (DFID); Annabelle Moatty
- Page 16 and 17:
Friendship University of Russia, Ru
- Page 18 and 19:
List of Abbreviations and AcronymsA
- Page 20 and 21:
IRENAIRIISEALISSCITCITU-TIUCNIUUIWM
- Page 22 and 23:
USAIDVPoAVSSWBGUWCDRRWEFWFPWMOWTOWW
- Page 24 and 25:
Figure ES-0-1. Possible roles for t
- Page 26 and 27:
Figure ES-0-2. Links among SDGs thr
- Page 28 and 29:
increase either the availability or
- Page 30 and 31:
Chapter 1.The Science Policy Interf
- Page 32 and 33:
Complex relationship between scienc
- Page 34 and 35:
Communication between scientists an
- Page 36 and 37:
1.2.1. Highlighting trends and prov
- Page 38 and 39:
International, Marine Stewardship C
- Page 40 and 41:
limited. There is a relative dearth
- Page 42 and 43:
educe the time lag between science
- Page 44 and 45:
Chapter 2. Integrated Perspectives
- Page 46 and 47:
2.1.4. Recommendations by the Inter
- Page 48 and 49:
ultimate idea is systems design - t
- Page 50 and 51:
2.2. Integrated SDG perspectives in
- Page 52 and 53:
Hunger andagriculturePovertyWorld B
- Page 54 and 55:
IIASA-GEAPBLSEIOECDRITE-ALPSFEEMGSG
- Page 56 and 57:
Table 2-4. Number of models capturi
- Page 58 and 59:
In order for oceans, seas and marin
- Page 60 and 61:
fully integrated scientific assessm
- Page 62 and 63: While some efforts are undertaken t
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3-3. Impact of important clas
- Page 66 and 67: Marine pollution from marine and la
- Page 68 and 69: While the scientific coverage of th
- Page 70 and 71: managementinitiative in BancoChinch
- Page 72 and 73: equired, with natural and social sc
- Page 74 and 75: Table 4-1. SDGs and DRR linkagesSDG
- Page 76 and 77: poverty forces low-income household
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 4-1. Economic losses relativ
- Page 80 and 81: OECD countries and, if they are ava
- Page 82 and 83: 4.3.4. Baseline setting and assessi
- Page 84: Using assessed levels of risk as ba
- Page 87 and 88: Table 4-3. Disaster management cycl
- Page 89 and 90: New sensor data also includes unman
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 5. Economic Growth, Inclusi
- Page 93 and 94: Table 5-1. Industrial policy waves
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 5-3. Number of Y02 patents p
- Page 97 and 98: increasingly production specific an
- Page 99 and 100: 5.3. Industrialisation and social s
- Page 101 and 102: education will either make it hard
- Page 103 and 104: Table 5-3. UNEP’s five key types
- Page 105 and 106: 5.6. Concluding remarksThe precedin
- Page 107 and 108: occurs despite the lower share of e
- Page 109 and 110: LLDCs face several development chal
- Page 111: technology-innovation (STI) policie
- Page 115 and 116: - A patent bank would help LDCs sec
- Page 117 and 118: In comparison to the Almaty Program
- Page 119 and 120: Box 6-6. ASYCUDA and Landlocked Cou
- Page 121 and 122: 6.4.5. The landscape of SIDS relate
- Page 123 and 124: Table 6-2. Example of science-polic
- Page 125 and 126: Figure 6-9. Data availability for i
- Page 127 and 128: Review Focusing on the Least Develo
- Page 129 and 130: Table 6-5. Coverage of SDGs in publ
- Page 131 and 132: - SYLWESTER, Kevin. Foreign direct
- Page 133 and 134: SIDS:- UNCTAD. Improving transit tr
- Page 135 and 136: Chapter 7.Science Issues for the At
- Page 137 and 138: 7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 139 and 140: implementation (SDG17), peaceful an
- Page 141 and 142: percentage of women holding a leade
- Page 143 and 144: environment, in order to make stron
- Page 145 and 146: technology transfer. Respect for ea
- Page 147 and 148: Figure 7-5. Concentrations of plast
- Page 149 and 150: SDGs What is measured? Data source
- Page 151 and 152: UN SystementityECLAC Drafted and re
- Page 153 and 154: Figure 7-6 shows very wide ranges f
- Page 155 and 156: Table 7-8. Factors that promoted or
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 8. New Data Approaches for
- Page 159 and 160: These novel Internet- and SMS-based
- Page 161 and 162: GabonNamibiaNigerSenegalRep CongoC
- Page 163 and 164:
Figure 8-5. Poverty map for Guinea,
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 8-9. Map of internet connect
- Page 167 and 168:
Box 8-11. A geographical approach t
- Page 169 and 170:
There are many well established met
- Page 171 and 172:
epidemics. Some African countries a
- Page 173 and 174:
Figure 8-13. Data innovations cover
- Page 175 and 176:
issues” in respective areas of ex
- Page 177 and 178:
Notes1 United Nations, Prototype Gl
- Page 179 and 180:
51 Contributions sent by national l
- Page 181 and 182:
112 The 72 models are: AIM, ASF, AS
- Page 183 and 184:
201 For more information, please vi
- Page 185 and 186:
276 A. R. Subbiah, Lolita Bildan, a
- Page 187 and 188:
354 Information available at: http:
- Page 189 and 190:
African Economic Outlook, Structura
- Page 191 and 192:
512 Report Of The International Min
- Page 193 and 194:
595 Jessica N. Reimer et.al, Health
- Page 195 and 196:
671 Pulselabkampala.ug, 'UNFPA Ugan
- Page 197 and 198:
732 Climate Change timeline: (a) Sc
- Page 199 and 200:
790 Oxfam. ICT in humanitarian prac
- Page 201 and 202:
863 T. Dinku. New approaches to imp