equired, with natural and social scientists workingtogether with holders of relevant traditional andexperiential knowledge, to better understand the nature ofthe complex interactions between humans and marine andcoastal ecosystems. More research towards valuingecosystem services, which might in turn encourage theprotection, conservation and more sustainable use ofoceans, seas and marine resources, is required.Contributing experts indicate a need to strengthen thecommunication between scientists, practitioners, decisionmakersand the wider public. All stakeholders need to beengaged in a more effective and systematic manner.Institutional barriers to an effective science-policy interfaceshould be eliminated, in order to enable closercollaboration among researchers, practitioners andgovernment officials. Research could sometimes be moredemand-driven and focused on policy-relevant informationrather than on knowledge and research gaps. Researchfindings could be disseminated to the wider public for thepurpose of education and increased awareness. Theeffectiveness of environmental education and engagementprogrammes with respect to changing the behaviours ofresource users and decision makers could be analysed.Human well-being cannot be achieved without theprotection and conservation of the Earth’s ecosystem. Tomaintain the quality of life that the oceans have providedto humankind, a change will be required in how humansview, manage and use oceans, seas and marine resources.Science can play an important supporting role in thisregard.Annex 1 (Extended versions of Table 3-1, 3-3, 3-4)Given its large size, Annex 1, containing extended versionsof Tables 3-1, 3-3, 3-4 is available on the DESA-administeredSustainable Development Knowledge Platform under:https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/globalsdreport/2015.68
Chapter 4.in the SDGsDisaster Risk Reduction: A Cross-cutting Necessity4.1. Global targets in two frameworksSince the year 2000, natural disasters have caused the lossof life of over 1.1 million and affected another 2.7 billionpeople 209,210 . Using another metric more known in thehealth sector, around 42 million human life years are lost ininternationally reported disasters each year, a setback todevelopment comparable to diseases such astuberculosis 211 . While improvements in disaster riskmanagement have led to dramatic reductions in mortalityin some countries in the last decade, economic losses arenow reaching an average of US$250 billion to US$300billion each year 212,213 .The ways that disasters undermine sustainabledevelopment have been much discussed in two significantUnited Nations processes.During the intergovernmental negotiations of the GeneralAssembly Open Working Group on SustainableDevelopment Goals (SDGs), many Member States stressedthe need to weave disaster risk reduction (DRR) as a strongcross-cutting issue in several SDGs. As a result, the proposalof the Open Working Group on SDGs that was presented inJuly 2014 214 includes several targets (see Annex 1) directlyrelated to resilience and disaster risk reduction.The third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction(WCDRR) organized on 14-18 March in Sendai, Japan,agreed on the Sendai Framework for Disaster RiskReduction 2015-2030 215 , a successor to the HyogoFramework for Action (HFA). To support the assessment ofglobal progress in achieving the outcome and goals of theSendai Framework, Member States also agreed on seventargets that will be measured at the global level. The firstfour targets aim at reduction of disaster mortality, numberof affected people, economic losses and disaster damage tocritical infrastructure. The remaining three aim atincreasing the number of countries with national and localdisaster risk reduction strategies, enhancing internationalcooperation in support of DRR in developing countries, andincreasing availability and access to early warning systemsand disaster risk information. This chapter takes theproposal of the Open Working Group as its reference pointand focuses on DRR in the context of the SDGs. It will firstlook at the interlinkages between DRR and several SDGs,giving illustrative examples of links in order to position DRRin the framework. Second, it will consider what setting DRRtargets will mean for monitoring progress, highlightingissues related to data collection, methodologies andbaseline setting. The last part of the chapter showcasesnew solutions for data collection and measurement in thecontext of DRR. The chapter aims at serving as one exampleof how the GSDR can help in capturing past and futuresustainable development trends, lessons learnt andscientific findings, indicating potential areas for policyaction, as set out in Chapter 1 of the report.4.2. Interlinkages – DRR as a cross-cutting issue in theSDGsDue to its cross-cutting nature DRR is interlinked withvarious SDGs beyond the explicit DRR targets set out in theOWG proposal. With most of the issues the linkage is twofold;if DRR is not given prominent focus, achieving severalof the SDG targets, such as ones related to povertyeradication, water, education, slums, and health, will beextremely challenging for many, particularly developing,countries. Also, falling behind the set ambition level onmany of the existing SDG targets that have a direct bearingon disaster risk, such as the ones related to povertyeradication, sustainable cities, food security, health, naturalresources management, or climate change, will meanadditional challenges in achieving the DRR targets. Forinstance, case studies indicate that the impacts of droughtcan only be partly attributed to deficient or erratic rainfall,as drought risk appears to be constructed over time by arange of drivers. These include for example poverty andrural vulnerability; increasing water demand due tourbanization, industrialization and the growth ofagribusiness; inappropriate soil and water management;weak or limited governance; and climate variability andchange 216 . Reducing drought losses will be challengingwithout addressing also these underlying drivers.In Table 4-1 some of the SDG goals have been combinedunder joint headings merely for brevity’s sake.69
- Page 1 and 2:
GLOBAL SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT REPOR
- Page 3:
ForewordIn September 2015, world le
- Page 6 and 7:
3.1. Interlinked issues: oceans, se
- Page 8 and 9:
7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 10 and 11:
Box 5-10. Operationalizing inclusiv
- Page 12 and 13:
Figure 8-8. Location of ambulance u
- Page 14 and 15:
Hentinnen (DFID); Annabelle Moatty
- Page 16 and 17:
Friendship University of Russia, Ru
- Page 18 and 19:
List of Abbreviations and AcronymsA
- Page 20 and 21:
IRENAIRIISEALISSCITCITU-TIUCNIUUIWM
- Page 22 and 23: USAIDVPoAVSSWBGUWCDRRWEFWFPWMOWTOWW
- Page 24 and 25: Figure ES-0-1. Possible roles for t
- Page 26 and 27: Figure ES-0-2. Links among SDGs thr
- Page 28 and 29: increase either the availability or
- Page 30 and 31: Chapter 1.The Science Policy Interf
- Page 32 and 33: Complex relationship between scienc
- Page 34 and 35: Communication between scientists an
- Page 36 and 37: 1.2.1. Highlighting trends and prov
- Page 38 and 39: International, Marine Stewardship C
- Page 40 and 41: limited. There is a relative dearth
- Page 42 and 43: educe the time lag between science
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter 2. Integrated Perspectives
- Page 46 and 47: 2.1.4. Recommendations by the Inter
- Page 48 and 49: ultimate idea is systems design - t
- Page 50 and 51: 2.2. Integrated SDG perspectives in
- Page 52 and 53: Hunger andagriculturePovertyWorld B
- Page 54 and 55: IIASA-GEAPBLSEIOECDRITE-ALPSFEEMGSG
- Page 56 and 57: Table 2-4. Number of models capturi
- Page 58 and 59: In order for oceans, seas and marin
- Page 60 and 61: fully integrated scientific assessm
- Page 62 and 63: While some efforts are undertaken t
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3-3. Impact of important clas
- Page 66 and 67: Marine pollution from marine and la
- Page 68 and 69: While the scientific coverage of th
- Page 70 and 71: managementinitiative in BancoChinch
- Page 74 and 75: Table 4-1. SDGs and DRR linkagesSDG
- Page 76 and 77: poverty forces low-income household
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 4-1. Economic losses relativ
- Page 80 and 81: OECD countries and, if they are ava
- Page 82 and 83: 4.3.4. Baseline setting and assessi
- Page 84: Using assessed levels of risk as ba
- Page 87 and 88: Table 4-3. Disaster management cycl
- Page 89 and 90: New sensor data also includes unman
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 5. Economic Growth, Inclusi
- Page 93 and 94: Table 5-1. Industrial policy waves
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 5-3. Number of Y02 patents p
- Page 97 and 98: increasingly production specific an
- Page 99 and 100: 5.3. Industrialisation and social s
- Page 101 and 102: education will either make it hard
- Page 103 and 104: Table 5-3. UNEP’s five key types
- Page 105 and 106: 5.6. Concluding remarksThe precedin
- Page 107 and 108: occurs despite the lower share of e
- Page 109 and 110: LLDCs face several development chal
- Page 111 and 112: technology-innovation (STI) policie
- Page 113 and 114: 6.2.3. Relevant publications for LD
- Page 115 and 116: - A patent bank would help LDCs sec
- Page 117 and 118: In comparison to the Almaty Program
- Page 119 and 120: Box 6-6. ASYCUDA and Landlocked Cou
- Page 121 and 122: 6.4.5. The landscape of SIDS relate
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 6-2. Example of science-polic
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 6-9. Data availability for i
- Page 127 and 128:
Review Focusing on the Least Develo
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 6-5. Coverage of SDGs in publ
- Page 131 and 132:
- SYLWESTER, Kevin. Foreign direct
- Page 133 and 134:
SIDS:- UNCTAD. Improving transit tr
- Page 135 and 136:
Chapter 7.Science Issues for the At
- Page 137 and 138:
7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 139 and 140:
implementation (SDG17), peaceful an
- Page 141 and 142:
percentage of women holding a leade
- Page 143 and 144:
environment, in order to make stron
- Page 145 and 146:
technology transfer. Respect for ea
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 7-5. Concentrations of plast
- Page 149 and 150:
SDGs What is measured? Data source
- Page 151 and 152:
UN SystementityECLAC Drafted and re
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 7-6 shows very wide ranges f
- Page 155 and 156:
Table 7-8. Factors that promoted or
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 8. New Data Approaches for
- Page 159 and 160:
These novel Internet- and SMS-based
- Page 161 and 162:
GabonNamibiaNigerSenegalRep CongoC
- Page 163 and 164:
Figure 8-5. Poverty map for Guinea,
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 8-9. Map of internet connect
- Page 167 and 168:
Box 8-11. A geographical approach t
- Page 169 and 170:
There are many well established met
- Page 171 and 172:
epidemics. Some African countries a
- Page 173 and 174:
Figure 8-13. Data innovations cover
- Page 175 and 176:
issues” in respective areas of ex
- Page 177 and 178:
Notes1 United Nations, Prototype Gl
- Page 179 and 180:
51 Contributions sent by national l
- Page 181 and 182:
112 The 72 models are: AIM, ASF, AS
- Page 183 and 184:
201 For more information, please vi
- Page 185 and 186:
276 A. R. Subbiah, Lolita Bildan, a
- Page 187 and 188:
354 Information available at: http:
- Page 189 and 190:
African Economic Outlook, Structura
- Page 191 and 192:
512 Report Of The International Min
- Page 193 and 194:
595 Jessica N. Reimer et.al, Health
- Page 195 and 196:
671 Pulselabkampala.ug, 'UNFPA Ugan
- Page 197 and 198:
732 Climate Change timeline: (a) Sc
- Page 199 and 200:
790 Oxfam. ICT in humanitarian prac
- Page 201 and 202:
863 T. Dinku. New approaches to imp