7.2. Crowd-sourcing science briefs for policy makersThe Prototype Global Sustainable Development Reportpublished in 2014 already provided initial information onexisting lists of “emerging issues” and how they wereidentified. The report also compared these lists of issues toan open process in which issues were “crowdsourced” frommore than 1,000 participating scientists who identifiedissues they wanted to bring to the attention of policymakers. The differences in results between the opencrowdsourcing for the prototype report and more“managed” established processes were significant (Table 7-2).In the open crowdsourcing exercise for the Prototype GSDRlast year, participants could simply propose an issue anddid not have to “invest” time and resources in writing abrief with all the necessary analysis and information tocarry the issue forward to the policy level.The performance of scientists is often measured by thenumber of peer-reviewed publications in high-impactjournals. Hence, when scientists have to invest significanttime in preparing a brief, it suggests that they perceive theissue as very important. Against this background, for thisyear’s Report, it was decided to issue an open call forscience briefs, inviting researchers and scientists to submitshort papers on issues relevant to sustainabledevelopment. Table 7-2 compares the top issueshighlighted in the scientific briefs this year with thoseidentified in last year’s prototype report, the WorldEconomic Forum’s Global Risk report and the WorldwatchInstitute’s State of the World Report 2015.Table 7-2. Top sustainable development issues scientists worldwide would like decision-makers to consider for actionTop-15 emerging issues identifiedby scientists for the PrototypeGSDR Regional 2014 conflicts due to globalcompetition for natural resources(oil and minerals)The climate–land–energy–water–development nexusPolitical instability and socialunrest from increased income andwealth inequalitiesChild labourNon-existent or decreasingenvironmental justice indeveloping and developedcountries.Youth unemploymentPersistence of poverty in poor andeven in rich countriesAnthropogenic reductions in netTop-10 “Global risks”identified by World EconomicForum stakeholders in 2014Fiscal crises in key economiesWorldwatch Institute: State of theWorld 2015*Expensive energy undermininggrowth and welfareTop-15 issues covered by 173 sciencebriefs prepared for the present report(#)Energy (19)Structurally highunemployment/Unsustainable economic growth Natural resource management (16)underemploymentWater crises Risk of stranded assets Governance (15)Severe income disparityFailure of climate changemitigation and adaptationGreater incidence of extremeweather events (e.g. floods,storms, fires)Loss of agricultural resources(land, water, stable climate)Climate change (13)Putting resilience of oceans at risk Water (13)Artic and indigenous peoplesGlobal governance failure Emerging diseases from animals Urbanization (11)Sustainable consumption and production(14)Health (10)primary productivity 543 Food crises Failure of a major financialWeak family structuresmechanism/institutionThe poor and the weakeverywhere are the losers ofincreasingly market-basedsolutionsLarge-scale increases in geneticmutations in humans due toaccumulation of toxic chemicals inClimate change-induced migrationour environment and in foodchainsHuman appropriation of netprimary productionAsteroid threat to humancivilizationProfound political and socialinstability132Disaster risk reduction (9)Biodiversity (9)Measurement (8)Violence in schools Oceans (7)Poverty eradication (7)Monitoring and accountability (7)Ethnic violence Economic development (7)Sources: left column: Results of crowdsourcing issues from scientists, conducted by the United Nations for the Prototype Global Sustainable Development report2014. Second from left: Global Risks Perception Survey 2013-2014, as reported in WEF’s Global Risks Report 2014 544 . Second from right: State of the World 2015:Confronting Hidden Threats to Sustainability, Worldwatch Institute. 545 *Listing unranked. Right column: Briefs submitted by scientists in response to an open call forthe present report. 546, 552 Note: In the WEF survey, from a list of 31 risks, survey respondents were asked to identify the 5 they are most concerned about. The rightcolumn covers the first 173 of 187 accepted science briefs only.
7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the present reportBy way of general guidance, the open call stated that thebriefs should address an issue, finding, or research with abearing on sustainable development in its three dimensions– economic, social, and environmental – or the interlinkagesbetween them. It was suggested that prospectiveauthors could review up-to-date findings relating to aparticular issue, address a single issue of importance, orpresent solutions to a problem or challenge. Briefs couldalso present the “story” of a research finding withpotentially great policy relevance but that hitherto had notbeen typically considered in the policy debate. Authorswere reminded that the briefs had to be factual and basedon peer-reviewed literature. The call specifically stated thatcontributions from both the natural and social sciencecommunities from all disciplines were highly valued andwelcomed. Further guidance to potential authors called forconcise briefs (less than 1,500 words) that are factual andbased on peer-reviewed literature. It was alsorecommended to highlight key messages from the currentscientific debate for the attention of policy-makers.topics ranging from antibiotic resistance, karst and caves,through to the health of the oceans.Of the 187 accepted science briefs, 136 were in English, 41in Chinese, 6 in Spanish, 3 in French, and one in Portuguese(Figure 7-1). No briefs were received in Russian or Arabic.Briefs were received from 367 natural and social scientistsfrom 46 countries representing all continents anddeveloped and developing countries alike (Figure 7-2). 24of these countries – a slight majority - are developingcountries, and China topped the list with the mostcontributions. Most of the contributing scientists hadaffiliations with universities and research centres, only afew with other NGOs or government institutions. Anecdotalevidence indicates that a sizable share of the participatingscientists with affiliations to universities in developedcountries are citizens of developing countries.Figure 7-1. Briefs submitted in various languages for thepresent reportThe call for briefs was posted in five of six United Nationslanguages on the website of the Division for SustainableDevelopment of the United Nations Department ofEconomic and Social Affairs. 547 It welcomed submissions inall United Nations languages. The call was also shared witha number of organizations in the sustainable developmentcommunity, such as the IUCN scientific community; ICSUand online networks; and the SDG listserve of IISD. The callwas also disseminated via working-level contacts andnetworks of GSDR team members in various UN entities. Anumber of briefs were also sourced from young academicsthrough close collaboration with universities. 548 All briefswere reviewed by the GSDR team and were accepted, ifthey met basic quality requirements in terms of language,structure and, critically, grounding in the peer-reviewedliterature or exposition of new research findings. Overall,the guiding principle adopted in reviewing the briefs wasnot the imposition of uniform standards of perceivedquality, but rather facilitating the sharing of thinking onsustainable development issues from as wide a range ofperspectives as possible.Source: https://gsdr2015.wordpress.com/All the briefs accepted for publication were posted on theGSDR website. 550,551 They were also made available for anopen, public comment and review using an onlineplatform. 552 All the authors of the briefs were encouragedto provide feedback on each other’s briefs, and notices ofthe open review were also disseminated via social mediachannels and the SDG list-serve. Four criteria were used inthe review of the science briefs: scientific basis, balancedapproach, novelty, and accessibility (Table 7-3).Table 7-3. Criteria used in the review of the science briefsCriteria QuestionScientific basis Is the brief factual and based on peer-reviewed literature?BalancedapproachDoes it consider a wider range of scientific perspectives?Does it reflect economic, social and environmental aspects?Does it present an issue that is typically not adequatelyconsidered in the global SD policy debate?7.2.2. 187 accepted science briefsAccessibility Is the brief well-written and easily understandable?The open call for science briefs resulted in 187 acceptedcontributions. 549Table 7-4 presents a list of briefs that had received mostThey provide a bottom-up, “crowdsourced”sample of sustainable development issues from aattention in the course of the open review (as of 24 March2015). The wide range of topics that are not typically highdiversity of perspectives around the world. The briefs cover133Novelty
- Page 1 and 2:
GLOBAL SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT REPOR
- Page 3:
ForewordIn September 2015, world le
- Page 6 and 7:
3.1. Interlinked issues: oceans, se
- Page 8 and 9:
7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 10 and 11:
Box 5-10. Operationalizing inclusiv
- Page 12 and 13:
Figure 8-8. Location of ambulance u
- Page 14 and 15:
Hentinnen (DFID); Annabelle Moatty
- Page 16 and 17:
Friendship University of Russia, Ru
- Page 18 and 19:
List of Abbreviations and AcronymsA
- Page 20 and 21:
IRENAIRIISEALISSCITCITU-TIUCNIUUIWM
- Page 22 and 23:
USAIDVPoAVSSWBGUWCDRRWEFWFPWMOWTOWW
- Page 24 and 25:
Figure ES-0-1. Possible roles for t
- Page 26 and 27:
Figure ES-0-2. Links among SDGs thr
- Page 28 and 29:
increase either the availability or
- Page 30 and 31:
Chapter 1.The Science Policy Interf
- Page 32 and 33:
Complex relationship between scienc
- Page 34 and 35:
Communication between scientists an
- Page 36 and 37:
1.2.1. Highlighting trends and prov
- Page 38 and 39:
International, Marine Stewardship C
- Page 40 and 41:
limited. There is a relative dearth
- Page 42 and 43:
educe the time lag between science
- Page 44 and 45:
Chapter 2. Integrated Perspectives
- Page 46 and 47:
2.1.4. Recommendations by the Inter
- Page 48 and 49:
ultimate idea is systems design - t
- Page 50 and 51:
2.2. Integrated SDG perspectives in
- Page 52 and 53:
Hunger andagriculturePovertyWorld B
- Page 54 and 55:
IIASA-GEAPBLSEIOECDRITE-ALPSFEEMGSG
- Page 56 and 57:
Table 2-4. Number of models capturi
- Page 58 and 59:
In order for oceans, seas and marin
- Page 60 and 61:
fully integrated scientific assessm
- Page 62 and 63:
While some efforts are undertaken t
- Page 64 and 65:
Table 3-3. Impact of important clas
- Page 66 and 67:
Marine pollution from marine and la
- Page 68 and 69:
While the scientific coverage of th
- Page 70 and 71:
managementinitiative in BancoChinch
- Page 72 and 73:
equired, with natural and social sc
- Page 74 and 75:
Table 4-1. SDGs and DRR linkagesSDG
- Page 76 and 77:
poverty forces low-income household
- Page 78 and 79:
Figure 4-1. Economic losses relativ
- Page 80 and 81:
OECD countries and, if they are ava
- Page 82 and 83:
4.3.4. Baseline setting and assessi
- Page 84:
Using assessed levels of risk as ba
- Page 87 and 88: Table 4-3. Disaster management cycl
- Page 89 and 90: New sensor data also includes unman
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 5. Economic Growth, Inclusi
- Page 93 and 94: Table 5-1. Industrial policy waves
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 5-3. Number of Y02 patents p
- Page 97 and 98: increasingly production specific an
- Page 99 and 100: 5.3. Industrialisation and social s
- Page 101 and 102: education will either make it hard
- Page 103 and 104: Table 5-3. UNEP’s five key types
- Page 105 and 106: 5.6. Concluding remarksThe precedin
- Page 107 and 108: occurs despite the lower share of e
- Page 109 and 110: LLDCs face several development chal
- Page 111 and 112: technology-innovation (STI) policie
- Page 113 and 114: 6.2.3. Relevant publications for LD
- Page 115 and 116: - A patent bank would help LDCs sec
- Page 117 and 118: In comparison to the Almaty Program
- Page 119 and 120: Box 6-6. ASYCUDA and Landlocked Cou
- Page 121 and 122: 6.4.5. The landscape of SIDS relate
- Page 123 and 124: Table 6-2. Example of science-polic
- Page 125 and 126: Figure 6-9. Data availability for i
- Page 127 and 128: Review Focusing on the Least Develo
- Page 129 and 130: Table 6-5. Coverage of SDGs in publ
- Page 131 and 132: - SYLWESTER, Kevin. Foreign direct
- Page 133 and 134: SIDS:- UNCTAD. Improving transit tr
- Page 135: Chapter 7.Science Issues for the At
- Page 139 and 140: implementation (SDG17), peaceful an
- Page 141 and 142: percentage of women holding a leade
- Page 143 and 144: environment, in order to make stron
- Page 145 and 146: technology transfer. Respect for ea
- Page 147 and 148: Figure 7-5. Concentrations of plast
- Page 149 and 150: SDGs What is measured? Data source
- Page 151 and 152: UN SystementityECLAC Drafted and re
- Page 153 and 154: Figure 7-6 shows very wide ranges f
- Page 155 and 156: Table 7-8. Factors that promoted or
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 8. New Data Approaches for
- Page 159 and 160: These novel Internet- and SMS-based
- Page 161 and 162: GabonNamibiaNigerSenegalRep CongoC
- Page 163 and 164: Figure 8-5. Poverty map for Guinea,
- Page 165 and 166: Figure 8-9. Map of internet connect
- Page 167 and 168: Box 8-11. A geographical approach t
- Page 169 and 170: There are many well established met
- Page 171 and 172: epidemics. Some African countries a
- Page 173 and 174: Figure 8-13. Data innovations cover
- Page 175 and 176: issues” in respective areas of ex
- Page 177 and 178: Notes1 United Nations, Prototype Gl
- Page 179 and 180: 51 Contributions sent by national l
- Page 181 and 182: 112 The 72 models are: AIM, ASF, AS
- Page 183 and 184: 201 For more information, please vi
- Page 185 and 186: 276 A. R. Subbiah, Lolita Bildan, a
- Page 187 and 188:
354 Information available at: http:
- Page 189 and 190:
African Economic Outlook, Structura
- Page 191 and 192:
512 Report Of The International Min
- Page 193 and 194:
595 Jessica N. Reimer et.al, Health
- Page 195 and 196:
671 Pulselabkampala.ug, 'UNFPA Ugan
- Page 197 and 198:
732 Climate Change timeline: (a) Sc
- Page 199 and 200:
790 Oxfam. ICT in humanitarian prac
- Page 201 and 202:
863 T. Dinku. New approaches to imp