2.2. Integrated SDG perspectives in internationalassessmentsA large number of international assessments are carriedout in the UN system and beyond. Many of them take anintegrated perspective to a subset of the SDGs. The SDGcoverage of these assessments is summarized next.The Prototype Global Sustainable Development Report2014 introduced some of the most important recentinternational assessments, proposed a typology of theseassessments, and discussed the strengths and weaknessesof various assessment models. It also compiled a list ofmore than one hundred assessments, outlook reports andother flagship publications of the UN system.Here we build on and extend that work. In a first step, adatabase of international assessments was created, whichincluded the assessments and flagship reports consideredin the Prototype GSDR 2014 69 ; a background paper of theSG’s Scientific Advisory Board 103 ; various UNEP and IPBESreports 104 105 ; the Assessment of Assessments 106 ; andreports provided by UN entities. In a second step, the listwas narrowed down by excluding assessments that are notstrictly international assessments (e.g. policy briefs orregional reports) and including only a selection of recurringreports. In a third stage, a subsample of 36 international46assessments was selected, in order to keep about 3 reportsfor each SDG and preferentially keep reports that cover arange of SDGs (Table 2-2) As a result, the selection of 36assessments is not a representative sample, but canprovide insights on how the assessments actually covercombinations of SDG areas.2.2.1. Hierarchy in terms of thematic breadthIn general, international assessments show a hierarchy ofassessments in terms of their thematic breadth.Target-level reports focus on well-defined themes many ofwhich can be associated with specific SDG targets, butmany are even more specific than SDG targets. Thisincludes many UN system reports, which provide detaileddata in areas covered by organizational mandates.Goal-level reports have a broader focus, and many can beassociated with a specific SDG goal. They seldom explorelinks with other areas.Integrated reports consider several of the SDGs areas indepth, even though their main focus may be on one specificarea.Linkages-among-goals reports investigate the linkagesbetween at least two SDG areas (targets or goals).Box 2-1. Examples of "target-level" reports and "linkages-among-goals" reportsTarget-level reports:- Global Wage Report 2012-13 (ILO)- Global Employment Trends 2013: Recovering from a second jobs dip (ILO)- Food Wastage Footprint. Impact on Natural Resources. Summary report (FAO)- Food Outlook. Biannual report on global food markets (FAO)- World Drug Report 2013 (UNODC)- Scientific Synthesis on the Impacts of Underwater Noise on Marine and Coastal Biodiversity and Habitats (CBD)- Review of Maritime Transport 2012 (UNCTAD)- Global Mountain Biodiversity Assessment (CBD)- Urban World: Cities and Land Rights (UN-HABITAT)- Nuclear Safety Review for the Year 2012 (IAEA)- World Trade Report (WTO)- World Investment Report 2013 - Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development (UNCTAD)- Technology and Innovation Report 2012 - Innovation, Technology and South-South Collaboration (UNCTAD)- Global Mercury Assessment 2013: Sources, emissions, releases, and environmental transport (UNEP)- State of World Population 2012: By Choice, Not By Chance: Family Planning, Human Rights and Development (UNFPA)Links among goals reports:- Forests and climate change (FAO)- Forests and water (FAO)- Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management in Agriculture (FAO)- The State of the World’s Children 2013: Children with Disabilities (UNICEF)- Climate Change and Nuclear Power 2013 (IAEA)- Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management in Agriculture (FAO)- Scientific Synthesis of the Impacts of Ocean Fertilization on Marine Biodiversity (CBD)- Scientific Synthesis of the Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Marine Biodiversity (CBD)
2.2.2. SDG coverageJointly, the selected 36 international assessments publishedby 19 organizations in the ten year period from 2004 to2014 capture the full range of 17 SDGs (Table 2-2). Theselected 36 assessments tend to cover multiple SDG areas,either as stand-alone chapters of these assessments or asconsistent cross-cutting dimension of the analysis therein(Table 2-2). They typically capture three to five SDG areas indepth. However, this does not mean that all thematic areasreceive similar attention. Means of implementation,poverty, and growth and employment tend to be centralconcerns of assessments, whatever their main area of focusis. In the sample, the urban dimension (SDG 11) andsustainable consumption and production (SDG 12) arerarely considered in depth compared to the other SDGs. 107This illustrates the challenge for the Global SustainableDevelopment Report, which is expected to be moreintegrated and to cover wider scope compared to theseestablished flagship reports.Large-scale international assessments in the sample (e.g.,Global Energy Assessment, Global Environment Outlook,IPCC Assessment Report on Impacts, Adaptation andVulnerability) covered the largest number of thematicareas. Assessments which focused on the themes of SDGs 1to 9 (poverty, hunger and agriculture, health, education,gender, water, energy, growth and employment,infrastructure and industrialization) tended not to considermuch the themes of SDGs 11 to 16 (urban development,SCP, climate change, oceans, terrestrial ecosystems andpeaceful and inclusive societies). In contrast, assessmentswhich focused on the themes of SDGs 11 to 16 tended tolook at thematic areas under goals 1 to 10 moreconsistently and in more depth, even though both coverageand depth of treatment of these areas varies. Areas thatwere typically considered together include: energy andclimate change; poverty and health; poverty and inequality;inequality and peaceful and inclusive societies; inequalityand health; education and gender; and water andterrestrial ecosystems. Reports with a strong focus onenergy showed greater diversity in terms of SDG coverage.While these findings are based on a limited sample ofassessments, they do suggest that there is scope fortargeting assessments on currently under-investigated SDGlinkages. As illustrated in the Prototype GSDR, theimportance of such linkages depends on location and scale.Some linkages may be critical for groups of countriessharing similar characteristics, for example, Small IslandDeveloping States or Land-locked Countries. Hence, thegeographic scope for such studies needs to be adapted.The selected reports follow a variety of formats, structures,and approaches. Some are truly integrated in the sensethat their content in different areas results from anintegrated analysis, where inter-sectoral linkages areconsidered from the start, whereas others comprised acollection of independently developed chapters. Still othersare based on a collection of specific, individual expert viewswhich were assembled to provide a broad picture of thetopic and reflect a diversity of views.In line with the HLPF’s function to strengthen the sciencepolicyinterface, the UN system could consider creating andmaintaining an online and open database of internationalassessments on sustainable development. It would build onand integrate more specific collections of suchassessments, preferably based on a common datastandard.In view of the fact that international assessmentsconducted by different scientific communities tended toadopt diverse assumptions and perspectives, policy makerscould learn much from a regular synthesis of the diverseviews on policy options in particular SDG areas. This wouldinclude identifying commonalities and differences in policyrecommendations, in scopes, data and interpretation oftrends. The UN’s study entitled “Sustainable Developmentin the 21 st Century” (SD21) aimed to do that foragriculture 108 and energy 109 , respectively.The Global Sustainable Development Report could aimsystematically to bring together sectoral and thematicoutlooks in a coherent way and highlight issues whereinteractions should be taken into account.2.3. Global scenario models for integrated assessmentof the SDGsIn taking an integrated perspective of the SDGs as a system,quantitative models and related tools can provide usefulsupport. In view of the complexity of the interdependenciesand the fact that many assumptions have to be made aboutthe future, these models are typically used to create“scenarios”, or internally consistent, plausible futurepathways.47
- Page 1 and 2: GLOBAL SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT REPOR
- Page 3: ForewordIn September 2015, world le
- Page 6 and 7: 3.1. Interlinked issues: oceans, se
- Page 8 and 9: 7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 10 and 11: Box 5-10. Operationalizing inclusiv
- Page 12 and 13: Figure 8-8. Location of ambulance u
- Page 14 and 15: Hentinnen (DFID); Annabelle Moatty
- Page 16 and 17: Friendship University of Russia, Ru
- Page 18 and 19: List of Abbreviations and AcronymsA
- Page 20 and 21: IRENAIRIISEALISSCITCITU-TIUCNIUUIWM
- Page 22 and 23: USAIDVPoAVSSWBGUWCDRRWEFWFPWMOWTOWW
- Page 24 and 25: Figure ES-0-1. Possible roles for t
- Page 26 and 27: Figure ES-0-2. Links among SDGs thr
- Page 28 and 29: increase either the availability or
- Page 30 and 31: Chapter 1.The Science Policy Interf
- Page 32 and 33: Complex relationship between scienc
- Page 34 and 35: Communication between scientists an
- Page 36 and 37: 1.2.1. Highlighting trends and prov
- Page 38 and 39: International, Marine Stewardship C
- Page 40 and 41: limited. There is a relative dearth
- Page 42 and 43: educe the time lag between science
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter 2. Integrated Perspectives
- Page 46 and 47: 2.1.4. Recommendations by the Inter
- Page 48 and 49: ultimate idea is systems design - t
- Page 52 and 53: Hunger andagriculturePovertyWorld B
- Page 54 and 55: IIASA-GEAPBLSEIOECDRITE-ALPSFEEMGSG
- Page 56 and 57: Table 2-4. Number of models capturi
- Page 58 and 59: In order for oceans, seas and marin
- Page 60 and 61: fully integrated scientific assessm
- Page 62 and 63: While some efforts are undertaken t
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3-3. Impact of important clas
- Page 66 and 67: Marine pollution from marine and la
- Page 68 and 69: While the scientific coverage of th
- Page 70 and 71: managementinitiative in BancoChinch
- Page 72 and 73: equired, with natural and social sc
- Page 74 and 75: Table 4-1. SDGs and DRR linkagesSDG
- Page 76 and 77: poverty forces low-income household
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 4-1. Economic losses relativ
- Page 80 and 81: OECD countries and, if they are ava
- Page 82 and 83: 4.3.4. Baseline setting and assessi
- Page 84: Using assessed levels of risk as ba
- Page 87 and 88: Table 4-3. Disaster management cycl
- Page 89 and 90: New sensor data also includes unman
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 5. Economic Growth, Inclusi
- Page 93 and 94: Table 5-1. Industrial policy waves
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 5-3. Number of Y02 patents p
- Page 97 and 98: increasingly production specific an
- Page 99 and 100: 5.3. Industrialisation and social s
- Page 101 and 102:
education will either make it hard
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 5-3. UNEP’s five key types
- Page 105 and 106:
5.6. Concluding remarksThe precedin
- Page 107 and 108:
occurs despite the lower share of e
- Page 109 and 110:
LLDCs face several development chal
- Page 111 and 112:
technology-innovation (STI) policie
- Page 113 and 114:
6.2.3. Relevant publications for LD
- Page 115 and 116:
- A patent bank would help LDCs sec
- Page 117 and 118:
In comparison to the Almaty Program
- Page 119 and 120:
Box 6-6. ASYCUDA and Landlocked Cou
- Page 121 and 122:
6.4.5. The landscape of SIDS relate
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 6-2. Example of science-polic
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 6-9. Data availability for i
- Page 127 and 128:
Review Focusing on the Least Develo
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 6-5. Coverage of SDGs in publ
- Page 131 and 132:
- SYLWESTER, Kevin. Foreign direct
- Page 133 and 134:
SIDS:- UNCTAD. Improving transit tr
- Page 135 and 136:
Chapter 7.Science Issues for the At
- Page 137 and 138:
7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 139 and 140:
implementation (SDG17), peaceful an
- Page 141 and 142:
percentage of women holding a leade
- Page 143 and 144:
environment, in order to make stron
- Page 145 and 146:
technology transfer. Respect for ea
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 7-5. Concentrations of plast
- Page 149 and 150:
SDGs What is measured? Data source
- Page 151 and 152:
UN SystementityECLAC Drafted and re
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 7-6 shows very wide ranges f
- Page 155 and 156:
Table 7-8. Factors that promoted or
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 8. New Data Approaches for
- Page 159 and 160:
These novel Internet- and SMS-based
- Page 161 and 162:
GabonNamibiaNigerSenegalRep CongoC
- Page 163 and 164:
Figure 8-5. Poverty map for Guinea,
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 8-9. Map of internet connect
- Page 167 and 168:
Box 8-11. A geographical approach t
- Page 169 and 170:
There are many well established met
- Page 171 and 172:
epidemics. Some African countries a
- Page 173 and 174:
Figure 8-13. Data innovations cover
- Page 175 and 176:
issues” in respective areas of ex
- Page 177 and 178:
Notes1 United Nations, Prototype Gl
- Page 179 and 180:
51 Contributions sent by national l
- Page 181 and 182:
112 The 72 models are: AIM, ASF, AS
- Page 183 and 184:
201 For more information, please vi
- Page 185 and 186:
276 A. R. Subbiah, Lolita Bildan, a
- Page 187 and 188:
354 Information available at: http:
- Page 189 and 190:
African Economic Outlook, Structura
- Page 191 and 192:
512 Report Of The International Min
- Page 193 and 194:
595 Jessica N. Reimer et.al, Health
- Page 195 and 196:
671 Pulselabkampala.ug, 'UNFPA Ugan
- Page 197 and 198:
732 Climate Change timeline: (a) Sc
- Page 199 and 200:
790 Oxfam. ICT in humanitarian prac
- Page 201 and 202:
863 T. Dinku. New approaches to imp