managementinitiative in BancoChinchoro, QuintanaRoo, Mexico 195Ecosystem HealthReport Card forManaging ChilikaLake of Odisha State:a collaborativeapproach, India 196Linking Conservationand Livelihoods inthe Oracabessa BayFish Sanctuary,Jamaica 197Deterioration of thelake’s ecosystem due tonatural processes andhuman activitiesSevere degradation ofmarine ecosystems andhigh loss of biodiversity -declining fish catch andchallenges for localtourism industry*Further illustrative case studies are available in Annex I. 198consultation with localcommunities), no-take zonesand conch harvesting bans;establishment of alternativelivelihoodsRestoration strategy based onecosystem approach;development of “EcosystemHealth Report Card” todiagnose problems andidentify interventionpriorities; messages used incommunication strategy toengage stakeholders forsustainable management ofecosystem2-phase project to preservethe marine ecosystem andincrease biodiversity andspecies population; creationof a no-fishing zoneprotecting critical breedingareas and fish habitat;improve surveillance andmonitoring of fish, turtle, andcoral populations withinsanctuary; strengthencommunity capacity tomanage its marine resources;removal of debris frombeachesA number of methods can be used to assess the socioeconomicimpacts of oceans-related conservationmeasures and policies and should ideally be applied beforeimplementation: (1) project appraisal and evaluationmethods, including some mainstream methods such ascost-benefit analysis, and other less frequently used butpromising methods such as social return on investment ormulti-criteria analysis; (2) bio-economic models; (3)indicator systems; and (4) social surveys. As an example,the Marine Institute of Plymouth University recentlydeveloped the Integrated Marine Protected Areas Socio-Economic Monitoring (IMPASEM) framework to monitorand assess the socioeconomic effects of marine protectedareas within the PANACHE project. 199Asked whether overall the sum of existing projects andprogrammes at various geographical levels "added up" to amore sustainable management of oceans, seas and marineresources and an increase in human well-being,contributing experts note that, despite a multitude ofdifferent programs and initiatives, there seems to be a lackof common vision and integration among them, which canlead to duplications, overlaps, gaps and possibly conflictingactions by different actors. The quantitative and qualitativelevel of projects and programmes across variousgeographical regions varies. Some programs and projects66conservation of conchfishery• Eight-fold increase inannual fish and prawnlandings• Decrease of alieninvasive species• Protection of marineenvironment from landbasedactivities• Increase in coral reefsby 153%, fish density by272%, fish size by 16%,fish biomass by 564%• Reduction of algae by43%• Several species made acomeback or recovered• Improved sea turtlenesting conditions andhatching ratescommunities• Increased emphasis oneco- tourism leading tosignificant improvementsin community livelihoods• Increase in fish catch• Increase of monthlyfamily income offishermen• Development ofcommunity-basedecotourism as alternativelivelihood• Generation of alternativeincome opportunitiesthrough the project(fishermen re-employedas coral gardeners andtour guides)• Income from ecotourismand collection/sale ofnutrient-rich debris• Involvement of youth inproject elaboration toensure future marineconservationare not necessarily commensurate with the needs on theground. Contributing experts find that that projects andprogrammes are often able to result in more sustainableoceans management at the local and community scales, butneed to be scaled up to the national and regional level. Achallenge perceived is the lack of sufficient resources –human, financial, and knowledge—coupled with a lack ofpolitical will to tackle issues at the scale that is required.The implementation of national action plans, strategies andpolicies aimed at sustainable development is seen as beingimportant to support ongoing efforts.3.4. Towards an integrated approach when dealing withthe oceans, seas, marine resources and humanwell-being nexusOceans, seas and marine resources support the humanwell-being of all people by contributing to povertyeradication, food security, the creation of sustainablelivelihoods and jobs, human health and protection fromnatural disasters. They are the primary regulator of theglobal climate and an important sink for greenhouse gases,while also providing humans with water and oxygen.However, marine- and land-based human activities oftenthreaten ecosystem integrity and hamper the provision ofecosystem services crucial to humans and sustainabledevelopment.
Good governance, an enabling environment, sustainableland- and marine-based human activities, and adequatemeasures will be required to reduce the negativeanthropogenic impacts on the marine environment.Projects and measures should ideally be designed andimplemented in an integrated, cross-sectoral and crossscalemanner, in line with the ecosystem approach andinvolving all stakeholders. Terrestrial and marine/coastalgovernance should be linked, specifically addressing theimpact of land-based activities on marine and coastalenvironments (e.g. marine pollution).An ecosystem approach to ocean management is required,which considers the entire ecosystem, including humans, inan integrated manner and takes into account thecumulative impacts of different sectors and humanactivities. The United Nations General Assembly noted thatsuch approaches should be “focused on managing humanactivities in order to maintain and, where needed, restoreecosystem health to sustain goods and environmentalservices, provide social and economic benefits for foodsecurity, sustain livelihoods in support of internationaldevelopment goals” … “and conserve marinebiodiversity”. 200 Marine spatial planning (MSP) andintegrated coastal zone management (ICZM) are some ofthe management tools that play an important role,particularly in relation to managing conflicts of use. Amultitude of measures can be implemented to restore,conserve and protect oceans, seas and marine resourcessuch as the creation of marine protected areas andreserves. In this regard, it should be kept in mind thatsustainable alternative livelihood opportunities might haveto be created simultaneously so as not to undermine thelivelihoods of local populations. Policy regulations and/orincentives might be necessary to change the behaviour ofstakeholders and encourage their engagement inconservation and protection measures.High-quality data can support effective ecosystemmanagement (see as an example Box 3-5). In support of theWorld Ocean Assessment, the Gramed database 201 isexpected to be updated to ensure that a single portal willenable those interested to identify the information onwhich the first World Ocean Assessment is based and helpthem to access it. 202 In the past, scientific assessmentscontributed solid foundations in terms of informationsystems, for example the Census of Marine Life 203 with theOcean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) 204 .According to contributing experts, comprehensivedatabases, first at the country and then at the regionallevel, are required. Research institutions within each regionshould seek to work collaboratively to ensure that researchefforts are not duplicated, and that limited resources areefficiently utilized. The observation and monitoring ofmarine and coastal ecosystems are important to identifychanges over time, assess the effectiveness ofimplemented measures and policies and allow decisionmakersto develop appropriate and timely responses. TheGlobal Ocean Observing System (GOOS) is a good exampleof a system for observations, modelling and analysis ofmarine and ocean variables to support marine science,assessment of change and operational ocean servicesworldwide. Its three advisory bodies 205 supply scientificstudies and expertise. One of them, the newly createdBiology and Ecosystems Panel, will, among others, identifymajor scientific and societal challenges that requiresustained ocean biology and ecosystem variableobservations. 206Box 3-5. Space technology data for ecosystemmanagementSpace technology and other spatial applications cansupplement in-situ observations and provide valuable nearrealtime observations of physical, chemical and somebiological parameters at the sea surface and help overcomesome of the issues caused by the trans-boundary nature ofthe oceans. Several key ocean parameters can be obtainedin this manner (e.g. ocean bottom character, contaminants,heat flux, ice distribution, ocean colour, salinity, sea level,stream flow, surface currents, surface waves, temperature,wind speed and direction, and upper layer zooplanktonabundance). Space technology can also support themanagement of biodiversity and wildlife, for example bytracking tagged animals. Other ways of using satellite dataare being explored, including for tracking illegal,unregulated and unreported fishing. 207The illustrative case studies presented in Section 3.3confirm the close inter-linkages between oceans, seas,marine resources and human well-being and demonstratethat actions impacting one area of the nexus may also havean effect on the other areas. This aligns with the concept ofa network of SDGs with a multitude of interactions andsynergies (see chapter 2). In this context, future scientificresearch needs to be integrative and cross-sectoral andfurther "system or cluster thinking” approaches.Scientific information combined with relevant knowledgefrom experiences in implementing concrete projects canguide policy-making and activities. A collection of relevantscientific reports organized by topics, as presented inAnnex II of this chapter, could be useful. In this context, thecontinuation and update of the Gramed database 208 couldbe considered. The scientific coverage of socio-economicaspects of the nexus and threats affecting it needs to beimproved. Enhanced trans-/multidisciplinary research is67
- Page 1 and 2:
GLOBAL SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT REPOR
- Page 3:
ForewordIn September 2015, world le
- Page 6 and 7:
3.1. Interlinked issues: oceans, se
- Page 8 and 9:
7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 10 and 11:
Box 5-10. Operationalizing inclusiv
- Page 12 and 13:
Figure 8-8. Location of ambulance u
- Page 14 and 15:
Hentinnen (DFID); Annabelle Moatty
- Page 16 and 17:
Friendship University of Russia, Ru
- Page 18 and 19:
List of Abbreviations and AcronymsA
- Page 20 and 21: IRENAIRIISEALISSCITCITU-TIUCNIUUIWM
- Page 22 and 23: USAIDVPoAVSSWBGUWCDRRWEFWFPWMOWTOWW
- Page 24 and 25: Figure ES-0-1. Possible roles for t
- Page 26 and 27: Figure ES-0-2. Links among SDGs thr
- Page 28 and 29: increase either the availability or
- Page 30 and 31: Chapter 1.The Science Policy Interf
- Page 32 and 33: Complex relationship between scienc
- Page 34 and 35: Communication between scientists an
- Page 36 and 37: 1.2.1. Highlighting trends and prov
- Page 38 and 39: International, Marine Stewardship C
- Page 40 and 41: limited. There is a relative dearth
- Page 42 and 43: educe the time lag between science
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter 2. Integrated Perspectives
- Page 46 and 47: 2.1.4. Recommendations by the Inter
- Page 48 and 49: ultimate idea is systems design - t
- Page 50 and 51: 2.2. Integrated SDG perspectives in
- Page 52 and 53: Hunger andagriculturePovertyWorld B
- Page 54 and 55: IIASA-GEAPBLSEIOECDRITE-ALPSFEEMGSG
- Page 56 and 57: Table 2-4. Number of models capturi
- Page 58 and 59: In order for oceans, seas and marin
- Page 60 and 61: fully integrated scientific assessm
- Page 62 and 63: While some efforts are undertaken t
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3-3. Impact of important clas
- Page 66 and 67: Marine pollution from marine and la
- Page 68 and 69: While the scientific coverage of th
- Page 72 and 73: equired, with natural and social sc
- Page 74 and 75: Table 4-1. SDGs and DRR linkagesSDG
- Page 76 and 77: poverty forces low-income household
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 4-1. Economic losses relativ
- Page 80 and 81: OECD countries and, if they are ava
- Page 82 and 83: 4.3.4. Baseline setting and assessi
- Page 84: Using assessed levels of risk as ba
- Page 87 and 88: Table 4-3. Disaster management cycl
- Page 89 and 90: New sensor data also includes unman
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 5. Economic Growth, Inclusi
- Page 93 and 94: Table 5-1. Industrial policy waves
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 5-3. Number of Y02 patents p
- Page 97 and 98: increasingly production specific an
- Page 99 and 100: 5.3. Industrialisation and social s
- Page 101 and 102: education will either make it hard
- Page 103 and 104: Table 5-3. UNEP’s five key types
- Page 105 and 106: 5.6. Concluding remarksThe precedin
- Page 107 and 108: occurs despite the lower share of e
- Page 109 and 110: LLDCs face several development chal
- Page 111 and 112: technology-innovation (STI) policie
- Page 113 and 114: 6.2.3. Relevant publications for LD
- Page 115 and 116: - A patent bank would help LDCs sec
- Page 117 and 118: In comparison to the Almaty Program
- Page 119 and 120: Box 6-6. ASYCUDA and Landlocked Cou
- Page 121 and 122:
6.4.5. The landscape of SIDS relate
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 6-2. Example of science-polic
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 6-9. Data availability for i
- Page 127 and 128:
Review Focusing on the Least Develo
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 6-5. Coverage of SDGs in publ
- Page 131 and 132:
- SYLWESTER, Kevin. Foreign direct
- Page 133 and 134:
SIDS:- UNCTAD. Improving transit tr
- Page 135 and 136:
Chapter 7.Science Issues for the At
- Page 137 and 138:
7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 139 and 140:
implementation (SDG17), peaceful an
- Page 141 and 142:
percentage of women holding a leade
- Page 143 and 144:
environment, in order to make stron
- Page 145 and 146:
technology transfer. Respect for ea
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 7-5. Concentrations of plast
- Page 149 and 150:
SDGs What is measured? Data source
- Page 151 and 152:
UN SystementityECLAC Drafted and re
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 7-6 shows very wide ranges f
- Page 155 and 156:
Table 7-8. Factors that promoted or
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 8. New Data Approaches for
- Page 159 and 160:
These novel Internet- and SMS-based
- Page 161 and 162:
GabonNamibiaNigerSenegalRep CongoC
- Page 163 and 164:
Figure 8-5. Poverty map for Guinea,
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 8-9. Map of internet connect
- Page 167 and 168:
Box 8-11. A geographical approach t
- Page 169 and 170:
There are many well established met
- Page 171 and 172:
epidemics. Some African countries a
- Page 173 and 174:
Figure 8-13. Data innovations cover
- Page 175 and 176:
issues” in respective areas of ex
- Page 177 and 178:
Notes1 United Nations, Prototype Gl
- Page 179 and 180:
51 Contributions sent by national l
- Page 181 and 182:
112 The 72 models are: AIM, ASF, AS
- Page 183 and 184:
201 For more information, please vi
- Page 185 and 186:
276 A. R. Subbiah, Lolita Bildan, a
- Page 187 and 188:
354 Information available at: http:
- Page 189 and 190:
African Economic Outlook, Structura
- Page 191 and 192:
512 Report Of The International Min
- Page 193 and 194:
595 Jessica N. Reimer et.al, Health
- Page 195 and 196:
671 Pulselabkampala.ug, 'UNFPA Ugan
- Page 197 and 198:
732 Climate Change timeline: (a) Sc
- Page 199 and 200:
790 Oxfam. ICT in humanitarian prac
- Page 201 and 202:
863 T. Dinku. New approaches to imp