1.2.1. Highlighting trends and providing policyrelevantanalysisPossible roles for the HLPF in this category are directlylinked to the HLPF mandates on monitoring theimplementation of the sustainable development agenda.Experts pointed out that a key to the role of the HLPF is thecapability to assess the significance of progress globally, i.e.the synthesis and interpretation across all goals and targetstowards the overall outcome of global sustainability andhuman development. For many of the roles identifiedbelow, the Global Sustainable Development Report couldplay a key role in making information available to the HLPF.Capture past and future sustainable development trends,lessons learnt and scientific findings, indicating potentialareas for policy action. This function was included in themandate of the UN Commission on SustainableDevelopment from its inception, and the high priority thatexperts grant it is a reflection of its continued relevance. Itwas also emphasized in the inputs from UN Member Stateson options for the scope and methodology of the GSDR.The GSDR is expected to feature scientific findingsindicating potential areas for policy action in order toenable evidence-based decision-making within the highlevelpolitical forum. Many also suggested reporting ontrends and experiences at the national and local levels,based on countries’ own national sustainable developmentreports.Highlight interlinkages among sectors and tools toaddress them in an intergenerationally equitable way.Policy research in various clusters of issues has highlightedthe need for integrated policies that considerinterdependencies among sectors. In their inputs to the UNSecretary-General’s report on options for the scope andmethodology of the GSDR, Member States emphasized thatthe GSDR should indicate how interlinkages can beaddressed and what the leverage points and gaps are forimplementation. They suggested that the analytical focusshould be on the interaction among economic, social andenvironmental dimensions, on key drivers of change, andon clusters of closely interlinked issues. This might include,in particular, a cross-sectoral analysis of progress made,obstacles encountered and potential integrated policyoptions. Many would like the report to present goodpractices of integrated policies. The GSDR 2014documented interlinkages among sustainable developmentissues, both across the range of sustainable developmentthemes and for the climate, land, energy, water anddevelopment nexus. 34 Chapter 3 reviews the status ofscientific knowledge on the interlinkages in the oceans,seas, marine resources and human well-being nexus.Similar approaches could be taken by future editions of the32GSDR, focusing on new clusters that are relevant to theagenda of the forum.Expert quotes (3)“Highlighting interlinkages among sectors and tools to addressthem needs to be done in a nuanced manner. I suggest adding‘disciplines’ to ‘sectors’ and ‘tools’. Risk analysis in financialmodelling is quite different from CGE modelling (and theory), yetwe merrily mix the two. We have no alternative, but little effortseems to be made to really understand the consistency of theinformation that we use to motivate decisions.”Provide improved access to the findings of existingassessments and highlight synergies and trade-offs. Thereview of sustainable development progress undertaken inthe GSDR 2014 provided evidence that in recent decades,impressive gains in some areas have come at the expenseof worsening trends in others. A synthesis report such asthe GSDR is expected to add value and provide improvedaccess to the findings of a large number of existingassessments and to highlight synergies and trade-offsbetween actions taken in various settings. 35 In addition, asalready suggested by the GSDR 2014, the GlobalSustainable Development Report might help decisionmakingby bringing together sectoral outlooks in a coherentway and highlighting issues where interactions should betaken into account (see Chapter 2).Identify new and emerging issues through sound scientificevidence, assessments and forward-looking projections.The importance of this role was highlighted by UN MemberStates in their inputs on the scope and methodology of theGSDR. The identification of emerging issues is one of thefunctions of the HLPF and was one of the functions of itspredecessor, the Commission on Sustainable Development.Over the years, discussions at the Commissions played animportant role in transferring some of the emerging issuesidentified in the review process to the political process, inareas such as forests, oceans, energy, hazardous chemicalsand persistent organic pollutants. 36 Finding adequate waysto identify emerging issues over the whole spectrum ofsustainable development areas (including social andeconomic areas) and bring them to the attention of thepolitical process is therefore important. Chapter 7 of theGSDR 2014 and Chapter 7 of this report are devoted toemerging issues and include practical suggestions in thisregard.Provide a repository for recent assessments coveringsustainable development goal areas. As documented bythe GSDR 2014, there are hundreds of assessmentscovering the thematic areas relevant to sustainabledevelopment. Based on the work done for this report (see
Chapter 2), it appears that there is no publicly availabledatabase of assessments and flagship reports covering the17 SDG areas and documenting, even succinctly, thecontent of the assessments. In some cases, work carriedout by UNEP, IPBES, IPCC, as well as in the preparation ofthe World Oceans Assessments has produced extensive orquasi-exhaustive lists of reports. But the equivalent doesnot seem to exist in a readily available form for all of theSDG areas. A database of assessments, covering the 17SDGs and listing landmark assessments and reports and themost recent flagship publications of internationalorganizations, could therefore be useful for the purpose ofinforming the deliberations of intergovernmentalprocesses, including the HLPF. Such a tool would alsoprovide an entry point for practitioners working in differentareas of sustainable development. Experts who contributedto the report mentioned the importance of consideringrelevant reports coming from outside the UN system andmajor international assessment efforts and produced bynon-governmental organizations, think tanks, academia,global research programmes and the private sector. 37feature, focusing on topics that are on the agenda of theHLPF. 41Highlight lessons learnt and best practices from publicprivateresearch collaborations. Lack of integration of theprivate sector into knowledge systems, both as user andsource of relevant knowledge, has been identified as arecurrent issue. A substantial part of research anddevelopment in areas that are directly relevant to the SDGs(e.g. agriculture, energy) is undertaken by the privatesector. Yet private research efforts are not always factoredin public strategies for science and the science-policyinterface. In order to avoid divergent outcomes, it isimportant to achieve a certain level of coordination in thedirection of research in the public and private sectors. Thishas to be done in a context where the freedom of scientificresearch is a central policy tenet in many countries, eventhough research is regulated. 42 The HLPF could help featurenational experiences and practices in this regard, in relationto specific sectors and cluster of issues debated at theforum each year. 43Assess the coverage, integration and coherence ofinternational assessments in sustainable developmentgoal areas. With the adoption of a new developmentagenda covering a much broader range of issues, itbecomes important to consider how existing assessmentscover the various areas as well as the interlinkages amongthem. In particular, it is important to identify keyinteractions among areas that are insufficiently addressedby the sum of existing assessments. Chapter 2 of this reportaddresses these issues in more detail. Experts whocontributed to this chapter saw this as an important issuefor research over the coming years, hopefully informing thefollow-up of the SDGs. 38 Going down to the policy level, allof the SDG areas are covered by a large number ofinternational reports and assessments, many of which donot have this specific area as main focus. For example, theMillennium Ecosystem Assessment produced a synthesisreport on health and ecosystems. 39 As underscored in theGSDR 2014, reports produced by different scientific andexpert communities tend to adopt different assumptionsand perspectives. For the purpose of strengthening thescience-policy interface, when looking at an SDG area, itwould be important to examine the main conclusions andpolicy recommendations of the reports that cover thatarea, identify commonalities and differences inrecommendations, and present in simple ways the mainreasons for the differences – from availability of base datato interpretation of the data and trends to modellingassumptions to emphasis on alternative strategic options.Unfortunately, this is not frequently done. 40 This issomething that future editions of the GSDR could aim to33Box 1-5. An example of the science-policy interface in aprivate sector context: Finding appropriate metrics forvoluntary sustainability standards for agricultureIn agriculture, Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS) haveemerged and they offer an explicit articulation of specificobjectives - such as production practices, environmentalbenefits, or labor conditions - for farmers and value chainsas well as the mechanisms to certify or audit those. As theonly codified and readily verifiable market mechanisms thatensure and communicate key aspects of sustainability, VSSserve consumer needs and simultaneously support the roleof the state by providing a valuable public good. However,the research literature is clear that the lack ofcomparability and narrow research designs makes it verydifficult to determine the usefulness or the effectiveness ofthe VSS and their certification or verification systems. Asthese VSS approaches have grown in size and influence, theextent to which they actually fulfil sustainability objectives,and at what cost, needs to be understood better.Answering this question requires reliable and comparablemetrics.Already a number of efforts are under way. Commonindicators, capable local institutions, and performancemonitoring already exist, along with emerging bestpractices. The Sustainable Food Lab, an organization withmore than 80 members that include leading companies, iscollaborating on these approaches with the Committee onSustainability Assessment (COSA). ISEAL, the umbrellaorganization for leading VSS including Fairtrade
- Page 1 and 2: GLOBAL SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT REPOR
- Page 3: ForewordIn September 2015, world le
- Page 6 and 7: 3.1. Interlinked issues: oceans, se
- Page 8 and 9: 7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 10 and 11: Box 5-10. Operationalizing inclusiv
- Page 12 and 13: Figure 8-8. Location of ambulance u
- Page 14 and 15: Hentinnen (DFID); Annabelle Moatty
- Page 16 and 17: Friendship University of Russia, Ru
- Page 18 and 19: List of Abbreviations and AcronymsA
- Page 20 and 21: IRENAIRIISEALISSCITCITU-TIUCNIUUIWM
- Page 22 and 23: USAIDVPoAVSSWBGUWCDRRWEFWFPWMOWTOWW
- Page 24 and 25: Figure ES-0-1. Possible roles for t
- Page 26 and 27: Figure ES-0-2. Links among SDGs thr
- Page 28 and 29: increase either the availability or
- Page 30 and 31: Chapter 1.The Science Policy Interf
- Page 32 and 33: Complex relationship between scienc
- Page 34 and 35: Communication between scientists an
- Page 38 and 39: International, Marine Stewardship C
- Page 40 and 41: limited. There is a relative dearth
- Page 42 and 43: educe the time lag between science
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter 2. Integrated Perspectives
- Page 46 and 47: 2.1.4. Recommendations by the Inter
- Page 48 and 49: ultimate idea is systems design - t
- Page 50 and 51: 2.2. Integrated SDG perspectives in
- Page 52 and 53: Hunger andagriculturePovertyWorld B
- Page 54 and 55: IIASA-GEAPBLSEIOECDRITE-ALPSFEEMGSG
- Page 56 and 57: Table 2-4. Number of models capturi
- Page 58 and 59: In order for oceans, seas and marin
- Page 60 and 61: fully integrated scientific assessm
- Page 62 and 63: While some efforts are undertaken t
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3-3. Impact of important clas
- Page 66 and 67: Marine pollution from marine and la
- Page 68 and 69: While the scientific coverage of th
- Page 70 and 71: managementinitiative in BancoChinch
- Page 72 and 73: equired, with natural and social sc
- Page 74 and 75: Table 4-1. SDGs and DRR linkagesSDG
- Page 76 and 77: poverty forces low-income household
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 4-1. Economic losses relativ
- Page 80 and 81: OECD countries and, if they are ava
- Page 82 and 83: 4.3.4. Baseline setting and assessi
- Page 84: Using assessed levels of risk as ba
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 4-3. Disaster management cycl
- Page 89 and 90:
New sensor data also includes unman
- Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 5. Economic Growth, Inclusi
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 5-1. Industrial policy waves
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 5-3. Number of Y02 patents p
- Page 97 and 98:
increasingly production specific an
- Page 99 and 100:
5.3. Industrialisation and social s
- Page 101 and 102:
education will either make it hard
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 5-3. UNEP’s five key types
- Page 105 and 106:
5.6. Concluding remarksThe precedin
- Page 107 and 108:
occurs despite the lower share of e
- Page 109 and 110:
LLDCs face several development chal
- Page 111 and 112:
technology-innovation (STI) policie
- Page 113 and 114:
6.2.3. Relevant publications for LD
- Page 115 and 116:
- A patent bank would help LDCs sec
- Page 117 and 118:
In comparison to the Almaty Program
- Page 119 and 120:
Box 6-6. ASYCUDA and Landlocked Cou
- Page 121 and 122:
6.4.5. The landscape of SIDS relate
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 6-2. Example of science-polic
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 6-9. Data availability for i
- Page 127 and 128:
Review Focusing on the Least Develo
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 6-5. Coverage of SDGs in publ
- Page 131 and 132:
- SYLWESTER, Kevin. Foreign direct
- Page 133 and 134:
SIDS:- UNCTAD. Improving transit tr
- Page 135 and 136:
Chapter 7.Science Issues for the At
- Page 137 and 138:
7.2.1. Open call for inputs to the
- Page 139 and 140:
implementation (SDG17), peaceful an
- Page 141 and 142:
percentage of women holding a leade
- Page 143 and 144:
environment, in order to make stron
- Page 145 and 146:
technology transfer. Respect for ea
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 7-5. Concentrations of plast
- Page 149 and 150:
SDGs What is measured? Data source
- Page 151 and 152:
UN SystementityECLAC Drafted and re
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 7-6 shows very wide ranges f
- Page 155 and 156:
Table 7-8. Factors that promoted or
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 8. New Data Approaches for
- Page 159 and 160:
These novel Internet- and SMS-based
- Page 161 and 162:
GabonNamibiaNigerSenegalRep CongoC
- Page 163 and 164:
Figure 8-5. Poverty map for Guinea,
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 8-9. Map of internet connect
- Page 167 and 168:
Box 8-11. A geographical approach t
- Page 169 and 170:
There are many well established met
- Page 171 and 172:
epidemics. Some African countries a
- Page 173 and 174:
Figure 8-13. Data innovations cover
- Page 175 and 176:
issues” in respective areas of ex
- Page 177 and 178:
Notes1 United Nations, Prototype Gl
- Page 179 and 180:
51 Contributions sent by national l
- Page 181 and 182:
112 The 72 models are: AIM, ASF, AS
- Page 183 and 184:
201 For more information, please vi
- Page 185 and 186:
276 A. R. Subbiah, Lolita Bildan, a
- Page 187 and 188:
354 Information available at: http:
- Page 189 and 190:
African Economic Outlook, Structura
- Page 191 and 192:
512 Report Of The International Min
- Page 193 and 194:
595 Jessica N. Reimer et.al, Health
- Page 195 and 196:
671 Pulselabkampala.ug, 'UNFPA Ugan
- Page 197 and 198:
732 Climate Change timeline: (a) Sc
- Page 199 and 200:
790 Oxfam. ICT in humanitarian prac
- Page 201 and 202:
863 T. Dinku. New approaches to imp