09.09.2015 Views

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 58<br />

development can eliminate dictatorship just as it could declare a permanent dictatorship. For<br />

the actions of people, there is always the argument that the highest level of consciousness can<br />

and must exercise dominion over the lower. In political and practical terms that is the<br />

equivalent of a rationalist educational dictator. But Hegelianism, like every rationalist<br />

system, thus negates the individual as accidental and inessential, and elevates the whole<br />

systematically into an absolute.<br />

The Weltgeist only manifests itself in a few minds at any stage of its development. The spirit<br />

of an age does not thrust itself into the awareness of every person at a single stroke, nor does<br />

it appear in all members of the dominant nation or social group. There will always be a<br />

vanguard of the Weltgeist, the apex of the development of consciousness, an avant-garde that<br />

has the right to act because it possesses correct knowledge and consciousness, not as the<br />

chosen of a personal God, but as a moment in development. This vanguard does not wish to<br />

escape from the immanence of world-historical evolution at all, but is, according to the<br />

vulgar image, the midwife of coming things. The world-historical personality—Theseus,<br />

Caesar, Napoleon—is an instrument of the Weltgeist; his diktat rests upon his position in the<br />

historical moment. The world soul that Hegel saw riding by in Jena in 1806 was a soldier, not<br />

a Hegelian. 7 It was the representative of the alliance between philosophy and the saber but<br />

only from the side of the saber. But it was Hegelians, conscious of knowing their own time<br />

correctly, who demanded a political dictatorship in which they naturally would become the<br />

dictators. In no way different from Fichte, they were "ready to prove to the world that their<br />

view was infallible." That gave them the right to dictatorship. 8<br />

3—<br />

Dictatorship and Dialectics in Marxist Socialism<br />

The interpretation of Hegel's philosophy presented here, that it has a side whose practical<br />

consequences can lead to a rationalist dictatorship, also holds true for Marxism, and certainly<br />

in the kind of proof<br />

Create PDF with PDF4U. If you wish to remove this line, please click here to purchase the full version

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!