09.09.2015 Views

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 37<br />

for the understanding of the intellectual center of modern parliamentarism will be considered<br />

here.<br />

1—<br />

Openness<br />

The belief in public opinion has its roots in a conception that has not been properly<br />

emphasized in the enormous literature on public opinion, not even in Tönnies's great work. 9<br />

It is less a question of public opinion than a question about the openness of opinions. This<br />

becomes clear when one identifies the historical contradiction from which these demands<br />

arise and have arisen, namely, the theory of state secrets, Arcana rei publicae, that dominates<br />

much of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century literature. This theory of a great practice began<br />

with the literature on Staatsraison, the ratio status of which it is actually the core; its literary<br />

beginning is in Machiavelli and its high point in Paolo Sarpi. For a systematic and<br />

methodological treatment by German scholars, Arnold Clapmar's book can be mentioned as<br />

an example. 10 It is, generally speaking, a theory that treats the state and politics only as<br />

techniques for the assertion of power and its expansion. Against its Machiavellianism there<br />

arose a great anti-Machiavellian literature, which, shocked by the St. Bartholomew's<br />

Massacre (1572), boiled with indignation at the immorality of such principles. It answered<br />

the power ideal of political technique with the concept of law and justice. This was above all<br />

the argument of the Monarchomachian authors against princely absolutism. 11 In intellectual<br />

history this controversy is first of all only an example of the old struggle between might and<br />

right: The Machiavellian use of power is combated with a moral and legal ethos. But this<br />

description is incomplete because specific counterdemands gradually develop: precisely<br />

those two postulates of openness and the division of powers. These try to neutralize the<br />

concentration of power contained in absolutism through a system of the division of powers.<br />

The postulate of openness finds its specific opponent in the idea that Arcana belong to every<br />

kind of politics, political-technical secrets which<br />

Create PDF with PDF4U. If you wish to remove this line, please click here to purchase the full version

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!