131214840-Carl-Schmitt
131214840-Carl-Schmitt
131214840-Carl-Schmitt
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Page 62<br />
an unscientific socialism if a description of the proletarian state of the future were to be<br />
painted into this picture. It is a systematic necessity that everything affecting the proletariat<br />
only allows itself to be negatively determined. Only when one had completely forgotten that<br />
could one attempt to determine the proletariat positively. Accordingly all that can be said<br />
about this future society is that it will have no class contradictions, and the proletariat can<br />
only be defined as the social class that no longer participates in profit, that owns nothing, that<br />
knows no ties to family or fatherland, and so forth. The proletarian becomes the social<br />
nonentity. 13 It must also be true that the proletarian, in contrast to the bourgeois, is nothing<br />
but a person. From this it follows with dialectic necessity that in the period of transition he<br />
can be nothing but a member of his class; that is, he must realize himself precisely in<br />
something that is the contradiction of humanity—in the class. The class contradiction must<br />
become the absolute contradiction so that all contradictions can be absolutely overcome and<br />
disappear into pure humanity.<br />
4—<br />
The Marxist Tautology<br />
The scientific certainty of Marxism, therefore, only relates to the proletariat negatively<br />
conceived, insofar as it is economically the dialectical contradiction of the bourgeoisie. In<br />
contrast, the bourgeoisie must be known positively and in its full historicity. Because its<br />
essence lies in the economic, Marx has to follow it into the economic realm in order to<br />
understand it fully and in its essence. If he could succeed, if he could know the bourgeoisie<br />
absolutely, then that would prove that the bourgeoisie belonged to history, that it was<br />
finished, that it represented a stage of development the spirit had consciously overcome. For<br />
the scientific claim of Marxist socialism it is really a question of life and death, whether it is<br />
possible to analyze the bourgeoisie correctly and to grasp it intellectually. Here is the deepest<br />
motive for the demoniac assiduity with which Marx delved into economic ques-<br />
Create PDF with PDF4U. If you wish to remove this line, please click here to purchase the full version