09.09.2015 Views

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Page 62<br />

an unscientific socialism if a description of the proletarian state of the future were to be<br />

painted into this picture. It is a systematic necessity that everything affecting the proletariat<br />

only allows itself to be negatively determined. Only when one had completely forgotten that<br />

could one attempt to determine the proletariat positively. Accordingly all that can be said<br />

about this future society is that it will have no class contradictions, and the proletariat can<br />

only be defined as the social class that no longer participates in profit, that owns nothing, that<br />

knows no ties to family or fatherland, and so forth. The proletarian becomes the social<br />

nonentity. 13 It must also be true that the proletarian, in contrast to the bourgeois, is nothing<br />

but a person. From this it follows with dialectic necessity that in the period of transition he<br />

can be nothing but a member of his class; that is, he must realize himself precisely in<br />

something that is the contradiction of humanity—in the class. The class contradiction must<br />

become the absolute contradiction so that all contradictions can be absolutely overcome and<br />

disappear into pure humanity.<br />

4—<br />

The Marxist Tautology<br />

The scientific certainty of Marxism, therefore, only relates to the proletariat negatively<br />

conceived, insofar as it is economically the dialectical contradiction of the bourgeoisie. In<br />

contrast, the bourgeoisie must be known positively and in its full historicity. Because its<br />

essence lies in the economic, Marx has to follow it into the economic realm in order to<br />

understand it fully and in its essence. If he could succeed, if he could know the bourgeoisie<br />

absolutely, then that would prove that the bourgeoisie belonged to history, that it was<br />

finished, that it represented a stage of development the spirit had consciously overcome. For<br />

the scientific claim of Marxist socialism it is really a question of life and death, whether it is<br />

possible to analyze the bourgeoisie correctly and to grasp it intellectually. Here is the deepest<br />

motive for the demoniac assiduity with which Marx delved into economic ques-<br />

Create PDF with PDF4U. If you wish to remove this line, please click here to purchase the full version

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!