09.09.2015 Views

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 61<br />

of his own perfect knowledge of the phases of the historical past which lay behind him. He<br />

would not think correctly and would contradict himself if this development were not most<br />

deeply conscious of itself in his thought. If an epoch can be grasped in human consciousness,<br />

then that furnishes proof for a historical dialectic that this epoch is historically finished. For<br />

the face of the thinker is turned toward the historical, that is, toward the past and the passing<br />

present; nothing is more false than the popular belief that Hegelians believed they could<br />

foresee the future like a prophet. The thinker, however, only knows coming things concretely<br />

in the negative, as the dialectical contradiction of what is already historically finished. He<br />

discovers the past as a development into the present, which he sees in its continuous<br />

evolution; and if he has correctly understood it and correctly constructed it, then there is the<br />

certainty that this, as a thing known perfectly, belongs to the consciousness of a stage that has<br />

already been overcome and whose last hour has arrived.<br />

In spite of expressions such as iron necessity, Marx did not calculate coming things as an<br />

astronomer calculates coming constellations of the stars; in the same way he was not what<br />

psychologial journalism tries to make of him, a Jewish prophet who prophesied future<br />

catastrophe. That Marx has a powerful moral pathos that influences his argument and<br />

descriptions is not difficult to recognize, but it is not specific to Marx any more than is a<br />

venomous contempt for the bourgeoisie. Both can be found in many nonsocialists as well.<br />

Marx's achievement was to lift the bourgeois out of the sphere of aristocratic and literary<br />

resentment and elevate him into a world-historical figure who must be absolutely inhuman,<br />

not in a moral sense, but in the Hegelian sense, in order to appeal from an immediate<br />

necessity to the good and absolutely human as its contradiction, just as Hegel argues that "it<br />

can be said of the Jewish people that precisely because they stand directly before the gates of<br />

heaven that they are the most profligate." 12 In Marxist terms it can only be said of the<br />

proletariat that it will be the absolute negation of the bourgeoisie. It would be<br />

Create PDF with PDF4U. If you wish to remove this line, please click here to purchase the full version

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!