131214840-Carl-Schmitt
131214840-Carl-Schmitt
131214840-Carl-Schmitt
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Page 61<br />
of his own perfect knowledge of the phases of the historical past which lay behind him. He<br />
would not think correctly and would contradict himself if this development were not most<br />
deeply conscious of itself in his thought. If an epoch can be grasped in human consciousness,<br />
then that furnishes proof for a historical dialectic that this epoch is historically finished. For<br />
the face of the thinker is turned toward the historical, that is, toward the past and the passing<br />
present; nothing is more false than the popular belief that Hegelians believed they could<br />
foresee the future like a prophet. The thinker, however, only knows coming things concretely<br />
in the negative, as the dialectical contradiction of what is already historically finished. He<br />
discovers the past as a development into the present, which he sees in its continuous<br />
evolution; and if he has correctly understood it and correctly constructed it, then there is the<br />
certainty that this, as a thing known perfectly, belongs to the consciousness of a stage that has<br />
already been overcome and whose last hour has arrived.<br />
In spite of expressions such as iron necessity, Marx did not calculate coming things as an<br />
astronomer calculates coming constellations of the stars; in the same way he was not what<br />
psychologial journalism tries to make of him, a Jewish prophet who prophesied future<br />
catastrophe. That Marx has a powerful moral pathos that influences his argument and<br />
descriptions is not difficult to recognize, but it is not specific to Marx any more than is a<br />
venomous contempt for the bourgeoisie. Both can be found in many nonsocialists as well.<br />
Marx's achievement was to lift the bourgeois out of the sphere of aristocratic and literary<br />
resentment and elevate him into a world-historical figure who must be absolutely inhuman,<br />
not in a moral sense, but in the Hegelian sense, in order to appeal from an immediate<br />
necessity to the good and absolutely human as its contradiction, just as Hegel argues that "it<br />
can be said of the Jewish people that precisely because they stand directly before the gates of<br />
heaven that they are the most profligate." 12 In Marxist terms it can only be said of the<br />
proletariat that it will be the absolute negation of the bourgeoisie. It would be<br />
Create PDF with PDF4U. If you wish to remove this line, please click here to purchase the full version