09.09.2015 Views

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Page 76<br />

October 1922 in Naples before the March on Rome, Mussolini said, "We have created a<br />

myth, this myth is a belief, a noble enthusiasm; it does not need to be reality, it is a striving<br />

and a hope, belief and courage. Our myth is the nation, the great nation which we want to<br />

make into a concrete reality for ourselves." 26 In the same speech he called socialism an<br />

inferior mythology. Just as in the sixteenth century, an Italian has once again given<br />

expression to the principle of political realism. The meaning in intellectual history of this<br />

example is especially great because national enthusiasm on Italian soil has until now been<br />

based on democratic and constitutional parliamentary tradition and has appeared to be<br />

completely dominated by the ideology of Anglo-Saxon liberalism.<br />

The theory of myth is the most powerful symptom of the decline of the relative rationalism of<br />

parliamentary thought. If anarchist authors have discovered the importance of the mythical<br />

from an opposition to authority and unity, then they have also cooperated in establishing the<br />

foundation of another authority, however unwillingly, an authority based on the new feeling<br />

for order, discipline, and hierarchy. Of course the abstract danger this kind of irrationalism<br />

poses is great. The last remnants of solidarity and a feeling of belonging together will be<br />

destroyed in the pluralism of an unforeseeable number of myths. For political theology that is<br />

polytheism, just as every myth is polytheistic. But as the strongest political tendency today,<br />

one cannot simply ignore it. Perhaps a parliamentary optimism still hopes even now that this<br />

movement can be relativized, and as in Fascist Italy, it will let all this happen around it,<br />

patiently waiting until discussion can be resumed. Perhaps discussion itself will be discussed,<br />

if there is only discussion. But the resumed discussion cannot content itself with repeating<br />

the question, "Parliamentarism, what else?" 27 and insist that at present there is no alternative.<br />

That argument would be irrelevant, one never capable of renewing the age of discussion.<br />

Create PDF with PDF4U. If you wish to remove this line, please click here to purchase the full version

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!