131214840-Carl-Schmitt
131214840-Carl-Schmitt
131214840-Carl-Schmitt
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Page 76<br />
October 1922 in Naples before the March on Rome, Mussolini said, "We have created a<br />
myth, this myth is a belief, a noble enthusiasm; it does not need to be reality, it is a striving<br />
and a hope, belief and courage. Our myth is the nation, the great nation which we want to<br />
make into a concrete reality for ourselves." 26 In the same speech he called socialism an<br />
inferior mythology. Just as in the sixteenth century, an Italian has once again given<br />
expression to the principle of political realism. The meaning in intellectual history of this<br />
example is especially great because national enthusiasm on Italian soil has until now been<br />
based on democratic and constitutional parliamentary tradition and has appeared to be<br />
completely dominated by the ideology of Anglo-Saxon liberalism.<br />
The theory of myth is the most powerful symptom of the decline of the relative rationalism of<br />
parliamentary thought. If anarchist authors have discovered the importance of the mythical<br />
from an opposition to authority and unity, then they have also cooperated in establishing the<br />
foundation of another authority, however unwillingly, an authority based on the new feeling<br />
for order, discipline, and hierarchy. Of course the abstract danger this kind of irrationalism<br />
poses is great. The last remnants of solidarity and a feeling of belonging together will be<br />
destroyed in the pluralism of an unforeseeable number of myths. For political theology that is<br />
polytheism, just as every myth is polytheistic. But as the strongest political tendency today,<br />
one cannot simply ignore it. Perhaps a parliamentary optimism still hopes even now that this<br />
movement can be relativized, and as in Fascist Italy, it will let all this happen around it,<br />
patiently waiting until discussion can be resumed. Perhaps discussion itself will be discussed,<br />
if there is only discussion. But the resumed discussion cannot content itself with repeating<br />
the question, "Parliamentarism, what else?" 27 and insist that at present there is no alternative.<br />
That argument would be irrelevant, one never capable of renewing the age of discussion.<br />
Create PDF with PDF4U. If you wish to remove this line, please click here to purchase the full version