131214840-Carl-Schmitt
131214840-Carl-Schmitt
131214840-Carl-Schmitt
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Page 101<br />
28. Erich Kaufmann's exposition of Locke in his Untersuchungsausschluss und<br />
Staatsgerichthof (Berlin: G. Stelka, 1920) is a perfect example of Locke's immediate and<br />
practical relevance today. Kaufmann's work must also be noted because of its<br />
importance for the material concept of law (materielle Gesetzesbegriff).<br />
29. John Neville Figgis, The Divine Right of Kings (Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />
Press, 1914, 2d edition).<br />
30. John Marshall's opinion appears as the motto of chapter 16 in James Beck's book on<br />
the American constitution. [<strong>Schmitt</strong> refers to the German translation of Beck, The<br />
American Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924), which appeared as Die<br />
Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1926). A<br />
foreword by Calvin Coolidge and an introduction by Walter Simons, interim president of<br />
the Weimar Republic and later chief justice of the German Supreme Court, appeared in<br />
the German edition. Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial<br />
review in the American constitution. In the last years of the Weimar Republic, <strong>Schmitt</strong><br />
was involved in a debate with Hans Kelsen and others on the question of a "defender of<br />
the constitution." While Kelsen argued that judicial review would be the best solution to<br />
the question of which of the republic's governmental branches should be the<br />
authoritative interpreter of the constitution and thus its "defender," <strong>Schmitt</strong>, after briefly<br />
sharing this point of view, argued in Der Hüter der Verfassung (1931) that the<br />
Reichspräsident was best suited to defend the constitution. Cf. the 1931 version of this<br />
discussion with <strong>Schmitt</strong>'s "Der Hüter der Verfassung," Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts,<br />
16 (1929), 161–237. See also Bendersky, <strong>Carl</strong> <strong>Schmitt</strong>: Theorist for the Reich<br />
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983), 112ff., and Ellen Kennedy, ''Bendersky,<br />
<strong>Carl</strong> <strong>Schmitt</strong>: Theorist for the Reich," History of Political Thought, 4 (1983), 582ff.; see<br />
also George Schwab, The Challenge of the Exception (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot,<br />
1970), 80ff. —tr.]<br />
31. Politische Theologie, 4ff. [<strong>Schmitt</strong> defines the sovereign as whoever decides the<br />
question of a state of exception ("Souverän ist, wer über den Ausnahmezustand<br />
entscheidet"). Cf. Pufendorf's discussion in De jure naturae (Bk. VII, chap. 6, sect. 8),<br />
quoted above. On Bodin see Julian H. Franklin's study, Jean Bodin and the Rise of<br />
Absolutist Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973). —tr.]<br />
32. [Tr.] Paul Laband was one of the founders of legal positivism in Germany. See Peter<br />
Oertzen, Die soziale Funktion des staatsrechtlichen Postivismus (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp<br />
Verlag, 1974), and Walter Wilhelm, Zur juristischen Methodenlehre im 19. Jahrhundert.<br />
Die Herkunft der Methode Paul Labands aus der Privatrechtlichenwissenschaft<br />
(Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1958).<br />
33. Leviathan, chap. 26, p. 137 of the English edition of 1651. [<strong>Schmitt</strong> refers to the<br />
chapter "Of Civil Laws," in Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. Michael Oakeshott (Oxford:<br />
Blackwells, 1946). —tr.]<br />
34. Dissertation on Parties, letter 10.<br />
35. On this see the extremely interesting examination by Joseph Barthélemy, Le rôle du<br />
pouvoir exécutif dans les republiques modernes (Paris: Giard & Briere, 1906), 489. The<br />
Create PDF with PDF4U. If you wish to remove this line, please click here to purchase the full version