09.09.2015 Views

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

131214840-Carl-Schmitt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 101<br />

28. Erich Kaufmann's exposition of Locke in his Untersuchungsausschluss und<br />

Staatsgerichthof (Berlin: G. Stelka, 1920) is a perfect example of Locke's immediate and<br />

practical relevance today. Kaufmann's work must also be noted because of its<br />

importance for the material concept of law (materielle Gesetzesbegriff).<br />

29. John Neville Figgis, The Divine Right of Kings (Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />

Press, 1914, 2d edition).<br />

30. John Marshall's opinion appears as the motto of chapter 16 in James Beck's book on<br />

the American constitution. [<strong>Schmitt</strong> refers to the German translation of Beck, The<br />

American Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924), which appeared as Die<br />

Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1926). A<br />

foreword by Calvin Coolidge and an introduction by Walter Simons, interim president of<br />

the Weimar Republic and later chief justice of the German Supreme Court, appeared in<br />

the German edition. Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial<br />

review in the American constitution. In the last years of the Weimar Republic, <strong>Schmitt</strong><br />

was involved in a debate with Hans Kelsen and others on the question of a "defender of<br />

the constitution." While Kelsen argued that judicial review would be the best solution to<br />

the question of which of the republic's governmental branches should be the<br />

authoritative interpreter of the constitution and thus its "defender," <strong>Schmitt</strong>, after briefly<br />

sharing this point of view, argued in Der Hüter der Verfassung (1931) that the<br />

Reichspräsident was best suited to defend the constitution. Cf. the 1931 version of this<br />

discussion with <strong>Schmitt</strong>'s "Der Hüter der Verfassung," Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts,<br />

16 (1929), 161–237. See also Bendersky, <strong>Carl</strong> <strong>Schmitt</strong>: Theorist for the Reich<br />

(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983), 112ff., and Ellen Kennedy, ''Bendersky,<br />

<strong>Carl</strong> <strong>Schmitt</strong>: Theorist for the Reich," History of Political Thought, 4 (1983), 582ff.; see<br />

also George Schwab, The Challenge of the Exception (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot,<br />

1970), 80ff. —tr.]<br />

31. Politische Theologie, 4ff. [<strong>Schmitt</strong> defines the sovereign as whoever decides the<br />

question of a state of exception ("Souverän ist, wer über den Ausnahmezustand<br />

entscheidet"). Cf. Pufendorf's discussion in De jure naturae (Bk. VII, chap. 6, sect. 8),<br />

quoted above. On Bodin see Julian H. Franklin's study, Jean Bodin and the Rise of<br />

Absolutist Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973). —tr.]<br />

32. [Tr.] Paul Laband was one of the founders of legal positivism in Germany. See Peter<br />

Oertzen, Die soziale Funktion des staatsrechtlichen Postivismus (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp<br />

Verlag, 1974), and Walter Wilhelm, Zur juristischen Methodenlehre im 19. Jahrhundert.<br />

Die Herkunft der Methode Paul Labands aus der Privatrechtlichenwissenschaft<br />

(Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1958).<br />

33. Leviathan, chap. 26, p. 137 of the English edition of 1651. [<strong>Schmitt</strong> refers to the<br />

chapter "Of Civil Laws," in Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. Michael Oakeshott (Oxford:<br />

Blackwells, 1946). —tr.]<br />

34. Dissertation on Parties, letter 10.<br />

35. On this see the extremely interesting examination by Joseph Barthélemy, Le rôle du<br />

pouvoir exécutif dans les republiques modernes (Paris: Giard & Briere, 1906), 489. The<br />

Create PDF with PDF4U. If you wish to remove this line, please click here to purchase the full version

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!