Advances in E-learning-Experiences and Methodologies

Recommendations

Info

AI Techniques for Monitoring Student Learning Process Meyen, E.L., Aust, R., Gauch, J.M., Hinton, H.S., Isaacson, R.E., Smith, S.J., et al. (2002 ). E-learning: A programmatic research construct for the future. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 37-46. Moodle. (2006). Retrieved October 22, 2007, from http://demo.moodle.com/ M’tir, R.H., Jeribi, I., Rumpler, B., & Ghazala, H.H.B. (2004). Reuse and cooperation in e-learning systems. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET (pp. 131-137). Muscettola, N., Dorais, G.A., Fry, C., Levinson, R., & Plaunt, C. (2002). IDEA: Planning at the core of autonomous reactive agents. In Proceedings of the Workshop Online Planning and Scheduling, AIPS 2002 (pp. 49-55). Toulouse, France. Ortigosa, A., & Carro, R. (2003). The continuous empirical evaluation approach: Evaluating adaptive Web-based courses. User modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2702, 163-167. Paredes, P., & Rodríguez, P. (2002). Considering sensing-intuitive dimension to exposition-exemplification in adaptive sequencing. In P. De Bra, P. Brusilovsky & R. Conejo (Eds.), Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive Web-based systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2347, 556-559. R-Moreno, M.D. (2003). Representing and planning tasks with time and resources. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Alcalá. R-Moreno, M.D., & Camacho, D. (2007). AI techniques for automatic learning design. In Proceedings of the International e-Conference of Computer Science (IeCCS 2006), Lecture Series on Computer and Computational Sciences (LSCCS) (vol. 8, pp. 193-197). VSP/Brill Academic Publishers. R-Moreno, M.D., Oddi, A., Borrajo, D., & Cesta, A. (2006). IPSS: A hybrid approach to planning and scheduling integration. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18(12), 1681-1695. Schmitz, C., Staab, S., Studer, R., Stumme, G., & Tane J. (2002). Accessing distributed learning repositories through a courseware watchdog. In Proceedings of the E-Learn 2002-World Conference on E-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare for Higher Education. SCORM. (2006). Sharable Courseware Object Reference Model. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from http://www.academiccolab.org/projects/ scorm.html Sicilia, M.A., Sánchez-Alonso, S., & García-Barriocanal, E. (2006, March 23-25). In Proceedings on Supporting the Process of Learning Design Through Planners. Virtual Campus 2006 Post- Proceedings, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (vol. 186). Barcelona, Spain. Small, M., & Lohrasbi, A. (2003). Student perspectives on online degrees and courses: An empirical analysis. International Journal on E-learning, 2(2), 15-28. Ullrich, C. (2005). Course generation based on HTN planning. In Proceedings of 13 th Annual Workshop of the SIG Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive Systems (pp. 74-79). AddItIonAL reAdIng This section provides some additional references related to the main research topics described in this chapter: AI planning and scheduling techniques, virtual education, authoring tools and e-learning standards. We have included both classical texts and some recent publications that could be used by readers to learn more about above-mentioned research themes.
AI Techniques for Monitoring Student Learning Process ADL, Sharable Object Reference Model, SCORM. (2006). Retrieved October 21, 2007, from http://www.adlnet.org/index. cfm?fuseaction=Scormabt Albers, P., & Ghallab, M. (1997). Context dependent effects in temporal planning. In Proceedings of the 4 th European Conference On Planning, Toulouse, France (pp. 1-12). Allen, J.F., Hendler, B., & Tate, A. (1990). Readings in planning. Morgan Kaufman. Anane, R., Chao, K.-M., Hendley, R.J., & Younas, M. (2003). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications (pp. 104-108). Honolulu. Andriessen, J., & Sandberg, J. (1999). Where is education heading and how about AI? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 130-150. Bacchus, F., & Kabanza, F. (2000). Using temporal logics to express search control knowledge for planning. Artificial Intelligence, 16, 123-191. Berlanga, A.J., & García, F.J. (2005). Authoring tools for adaptive learning designs in computerbased education. In Proceedings of the 2005 Latin American conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 190-201). Blum, A., & Furst, M. (1997). Fast planning through planning graph analysis. Artificial Intelligence 90, 281-300. Blythe, J. (1999). Decision theoretic planning. AI Magazine, 20(2), 37-54. Bonet, B., & Geffner, H. (2001). Planning as heuristic search. Artificial Intelligence, 129(1-2), 5-33. Brusilovsky, P. (1999). Adaptive and intelligent technologies for Web-based education (Special Issue on Intelligent Systems and Teleteaching). Künstliche Intelligenz, 4, 19-25. Brusilovsky, P., & Miller, P. (2001). Course delivery systems for the virtual university. In F.T. Tschang & T. Della Senta (Eds.), Access to knowledge: New information technologies and the emergence of the virtual university (pp. 167-206). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Burgos, D., Tattersall, C., & Koper, R. (2006). How to represent adaptation in e-larning with IMS learning design. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from http://dspace.ou.nl/bitstream/1820/786/1/BUR- GOSetal_SofiaExtensionToILE_v3_210806.pdf Carbonell, J.R. (1970). AI in CAI: An artificialintelligence approach to computer-assisted instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 11(4), 190-202. Castillo, L., Fdez.-Olivares, J., & Gonzalez, A. (2001). On the adequacy of hierarchical planning characteristics for real-world problem solving. In Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Planning (ECP’01). Cesta, A., & Oddi, A. (2002). Algorithms for dynamic management of temporal constraint networks (Tech. Rep.). Italian National Research Council. Chang, W.C., Hsu, H.H., Smith, T.K., & Wang, C.C. (2004). Enhancing SCORM metadata for assessment authoring in e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(4), 305-316. Clarke, M., & Wing, J.M. (1996). Formal methods: State of the art and future directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4), 626-643. Como, L., & Snow, E.R. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M.C. Wittrock, (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: McMillan. Cristea, A. (2005). Authoring of adaptive hypermedia. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 6-8. 0
Page 2 and 3:
Advances in E-Learning: Experiences
Page 4 and 5:
Table of Contents Preface .........
Page 6 and 7:
Chapter XIV Open Source LMS Customi
Page 8 and 9:
Chapter III Philosophical and Epist
Page 10 and 11:
of constructive and cooperative met
Page 12 and 13:
Chapter XIV Open Source LMS Customi
Page 14 and 15:
contents, learning contexts, proces
Page 16 and 17:
xv these organizations do not get a
Page 18 and 19:
xvii QuALIty In e-LeArnIng Before t
Page 20 and 21:
allow that the teachers in training
Page 22 and 23:
xxi ISO. (1986). Quality-Vocabulary
Page 24 and 25:
Chapter I RAPAD: A Reflective and P
Page 26 and 27:
RAPAD in fields such as law, engine
Page 28 and 29:
RAPAD mystery to the new student. B
Page 30 and 31:
RAPAD example, whereas Laurillard h
Page 32 and 33:
RAPAD Ontologically, systems philos
Page 34 and 35:
RAPAD information related processes
Page 36 and 37:
RAPAD methods and techniques accord
Page 38 and 39:
RAPAD 2. An introduction to learnin
Page 40 and 41:
RAPAD then asked to reflect on and
Page 42 and 43:
RAPAD Figure 4. A rich picture to h
Page 44 and 45:
RAPAD Again using techniques from t
Page 46 and 47:
RAPAD university preparation course
Page 48 and 49:
RAPAD The third interface is at the
Page 50 and 51:
RAPAD Knight, P.T., & Trowler, P. (
Page 52 and 53:
RAPAD AddItIonAL reAdIngs Goodyear,
Page 54 and 55:
A Heideggerian View on E-Learning t
Page 56 and 57:
A Heideggerian View on E-Learning (
Page 58 and 59:
A Heideggerian View on E-Learning s
Page 60 and 61:
A Heideggerian View on E-Learning r
Page 62 and 63:
A Heideggerian View on E-Learning o
Page 64 and 65:
A Heideggerian View on E-Learning n
Page 66 and 67:
A Heideggerian View on E-Learning M
Page 68 and 69:
A Heideggerian View on E-Learning W
Page 70 and 71:
Philisophical and Epistemological B
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Chapter IV E-Mentoring: An Extended
Page 86 and 87:
E-Mentoring However, what is unders
Page 88 and 89:
E-Mentoring baugh, & Williams, 2004
Page 90 and 91:
E-Mentoring Table 2. Contact. Diffe
Page 92 and 93:
E-Mentoring Table 10. Ethical impli
Page 94 and 95:
E-Mentoring Table 15. Technology st
Page 96 and 97:
E-Mentoring Table 21. Coaching. Bes
Page 98 and 99:
E-Mentoring Table 27. Moment. Best
Page 100 and 101:
E-Mentoring Moreover, existing rese
Page 102 and 103:
E-Mentoring Kasprisin, C. A., Singl
Page 104 and 105:
E-Mentoring Ensher, E. A., Heun, C.
Page 106 and 107:
Chapter V Training Teachers for E-L
Page 108 and 109:
Training Teachers for E-Learning FL
Page 110 and 111:
Training Teachers for E-Learning ne
Page 112 and 113:
Training Teachers for E-Learning A
Page 114 and 115:
Training Teachers for E-Learning yo
Page 116 and 117:
Training Teachers for E-Learning Di
Page 118 and 119:
Training Teachers for E-Learning ht
Page 120 and 121:
The Role of Institutional Factors i
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
E-Learning Value and Student Experi
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143: E-Learning Value and Student Experi
Page 156 and 157: Integrating Technology and Research
Page 172 and 173: Chapter IX AI Techniques for Monito
Page 174 and 175: AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen
Page 196 and 197: Chapter X Knowledge Discovery from
Page 198 and 199: Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning
Page 222 and 223: Chapter XI Swarm-Based Techniques i
Page 224 and 225: Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin
Page 236 and 237: Chapter XII E-Learning 2.0: The Lea
Page 238 and 239: E-Learning 2.0 Table 1. Different s
Page 240 and 241: E-Learning 2.0 Figure 1. Difference
Page 242 and 243:
E-Learning 2.0 where the blog is al
Page 244 and 245:
E-Learning 2.0 process. Along this
Page 246 and 247:
E-Learning 2.0 forth, and, of cours
Page 248 and 249:
E-Learning 2.0 Finally, it is impor
Page 250 and 251:
E-Learning 2.0 never be a hotchpotc
Page 252 and 253:
E-Learning 2.0 McPherson, K. (2006)
Page 254 and 255:
E-Learning 2.0 Rosen, A. (2006). Te
Page 256 and 257:
Telematic Environments and Competit
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Open Source LMS Customization Intro
Page 276 and 277:
Open Source LMS Customization or ev
Page 278 and 279:
Open Source LMS Customization compa
Page 280 and 281:
Open Source LMS Customization Figur
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Open Source LMS Customization Haina
Page 288 and 289:
Evaluation and Effective Learning p
Page 290 and 291:
Evaluation and Effective Learning r
Page 292 and 293:
Evaluation and Effective Learning t
Page 294 and 295:
Evaluation and Effective Learning p
Page 296 and 297:
Evaluation and Effective Learning m
Page 298 and 299:
Evaluation and Effective Learning c
Page 300 and 301:
Evaluation and Effective Learning H
Page 302 and 303:
Chapter XVI Formative Online Assess
Page 304 and 305:
Formative Online Assessment in E-Le
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
0 Chapter XVII Designing an Online
Page 326 and 327:
Designing an Online Assessment in E
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Chapter XIX E-QUAL: A Proposal to M
Page 354 and 355:
E-QUAL is proposed to evaluate the
Page 356 and 357:
E-QUAL provide competent, service-o
Page 358 and 359:
E-QUAL 2004; Scalan, 2003) and qual
Page 360 and 361:
E-QUAL benchmarks address technolog
Page 362 and 363:
E-QUAL E-learning added two differe
Page 364 and 365:
E-QUAL Table 6. Application of the
Page 366 and 367:
E-QUAL Future trends The future of
Page 368 and 369:
E-QUAL (EQO) co-located to the 4 th
Page 370 and 371:
E-QUAL SMEs: An analysis of e-learn
Page 372 and 373:
E-QUAL Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality
Page 374 and 375:
Compilation of References Argyris,
Page 376 and 377:
Compilation of References Biggs, J.
Page 378 and 379:
Compilation of References Cabero, J
Page 380 and 381:
Compilation of References Comezaña
Page 382 and 383:
Compilation of References Downes, S
Page 384 and 385:
Compilation of References Fandos, M
Page 386 and 387:
Compilation of References national
Page 388 and 389:
Compilation of References Hudson, B
Page 390 and 391:
Compilation of References Harbour.
Page 392 and 393:
Compilation of References Little, J
Page 394 and 395:
Compilation of References Metros, S
Page 396 and 397:
Compilation of References ONeill, K
Page 398 and 399:
Compilation of References Preece, J
Page 400 and 401:
Compilation of References Sadler, D
Page 402 and 403:
Compilation of References Shin, N.,
Page 404 and 405:
Compilation of References tional Co
Page 406 and 407:
Compilation of References Vermetten
Page 408 and 409:
Compilation of References Yu, F. Y.
Page 410 and 411:
About the Contributors Juan Pablo d
Page 412 and 413:
About the Contributors part: “An
Page 414 and 415:
About the Contributors María D. R-
Page 416 and 417:
About the Contributors Applications
Page 418 and 419:
Index e-learning tools, automated p
Page 420:
Socrates 55 Sophists 55 student-foc
show all

Advances in E-learning-Experiences and Methodologies

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?