Views
5 months ago

Advances in E-learning-Experiences and Methodologies

E-QUAL SMEs: An analysis

E-QUAL SMEs: An analysis of e-learning experiences in European small and medium sized enterprises. Bekkestua, Norway: ELQ-SME Project 2006. Barbera, E. (2004). Quality in virtual education environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 13-20. Barron, T. (2003). LoD survey: Quality and effectiveness. Learning Circuits. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.learningcircuits. org/2003/may2003/qualitysurvey.htm Belanger, F., & Jordan, D. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: Technologies, tools and techniques. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing. Bertzeletou, T. (2002). Presentation of the work of the European forum on quality in VET: Main outcomes and list of possible quality dimensions, criteria and indicators on quality management approaches (QMA), self assessment, examination and certification arrangements, quality indicators. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www2.trainingvillage.gr/etv/quality/Summary_of_the_main_results.doc Booth, A., Levy, P., Bath, P. A., Lacey, T., Sanderson, M., & Diercks-O’Brien, G. (2005). Studying health information from a distance: Refining an e-learning case study in the crucible of student evaluation. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 22(Suppl. 2), 8-19. Bourne, J., & Moore, J. C. (2004). Elements of quality online education into the mainstream. Needham, MA: Sloan-C. Brittain, S., & Liber, O. (2004). A framework for the pedagogical evaluation of e-learning environments. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.cetis.ac.uk/members/pedagogy/files/ 4thMeet_framework/VLEfullReport Carr-Chellman, A., & Duschatel, P. (2000). The ideal online course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 229-241. Chao, T., Saj, T., & Tessier, F. (2006). Establishing a quality review for online courses. Educause Quarterly, 29(3). Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.educause.edu/apps/eq/eqm06/ eqm0635.asp?bhcp=1 Concannon, F., Flynn, A., & Campbell, M. (2005). What campus-based students think about the quality and benefits of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 501-512. Dam, N. V. (2004). E-quality in e-learning. Chief Learning Officer Magazine. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://clomedia.com/content/templates/ clo_article.asp?articleid=507&zoneid=111 Dondi, C., Moretti, M., Husson, A.-M., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2005). Providing good practice for e-learning quality approaches. Interim Report: CWA 1. Project Team Quality Development. CEN/ISSS WSLT. Ehlers, U.-D. (2004). Quality in e-learning from a learner’s perspective. Paper presented at the Third EDEN Research Workshop 2004, Oldenburg, Germany. Ehlers, U.-D. (2005). What do you need for quality in e-learning? e-Learningeuropa.info. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.e-Learningeuropa.info/directory/index.php?page=doc&doc_ id=6068&doclng=6 Ehlers, U.-D. (2007). The E- empowering learners: Myths and realities in learner-orientated e-learning quality. E-Learning Papers, 2. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www. e-Learningpapers.eu/index.php?page=doc&doc_ id=8550&doclng=6 Ehlers, U.-D., & Goertz, L. (2006). Handbook on quality and standardization in e-learning. Berlin- Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag. Ehlers, U.-D., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2004). E- learning-quality: A decision support model for European quality approaches. In G. Fietz, C. Godio & R. Mason (Eds.), E-learning for international

E-QUAL markets. Development and use of e-learning in Europa. Bielefeld. EVTA. (2005). Selected e-learning in vocational training—Good practices collection. Final report. Brussels: European Vocational Training Association. Giannini-Gachago, D., Lee, M., & Thurab-Nkhosi, D. (2005). Towards development of best practice guidelines for e-learning courses at the University of Botswana. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology for Education (CATE 2005), Aruba. Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3), 287- 299. Heldberg, J. G. (2003). Ensuring quality e-learning creating engaging tasks. Educational Media International, 40(3-4), 175-186. Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Oliver, R., Stoney, S., & Willis, J. (2001). Quality guidelines for online courses: The development of an instrument to audit online units. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the Crossroads: Proceedings of ASCILITE 2001 (pp. 263-270). Melbourne: The University of Melbourne. Hicks, S. (2000, December). Evaluating e-learning. Training and Development, 77-79. Hughes, J., & Attwell, G. (2002). A framework for the evaluation of e-learning. Paper presented at European Seminars—Exploring Models and Partnerships for e-Learning in SMEs, Scotland and Brussels, Belgium. Keppell, C. McNaught & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the crossroads: Proceedings of ASCILITE 2001 (pp. 263-270). Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne. Khan, B. H. (2005). Managing e-learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Information Science Publishing. Kidney, G., Cummings, L., & Boehm, A. (2007). Toward a quality assurance approach to e-learning courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(1), 17-30. Littlejohn, A. (2005). Key issues in the design and delivery of technology-enhanced learning. In P. Levy & S. Roberts (Eds.), Developing the new learning environment: The changing role of the academic librarian (pp. 70-90). London: Facet. Lockee, B., Moore, M., & Burton, J. (2002). Measuring success: Evaluation strategies for distance education. Educause Quarterly, 1. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.educause. edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0213.pdf Macpherson, A., Elliot, M., Harris, I., & Homan, G. (2004). E-learning: Reflections and evaluation of corporate programmes. Human Resource Development International, 7(3), 295-313. Mandinach, E. B. (2005). The development of effective evaluation methods for e-learning: A concept paper and action plan. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1814-1835. Massy, J. (2002). Quality and e-learning in Europe. Reading: BizMedia Ltd. McGorry, S. Y. (2003). Measuring quality in online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6, 159-177. McNaught, C., & Lam, P. (2005). Building an evaluation culture and evidence base for e-learning in three Hong Kong universities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 599-614. Melton, R. (2002). Planning and developing open and distance learning: A framework for quality. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

  • Page 2 and 3:

    Advances in E-Learning: Experiences

  • Page 4 and 5:

    Table of Contents Preface .........

  • Page 6 and 7:

    Chapter XIV Open Source LMS Customi

  • Page 8 and 9:

    Chapter III Philosophical and Epist

  • Page 10 and 11:

    of constructive and cooperative met

  • Page 12 and 13:

    Chapter XIV Open Source LMS Customi

  • Page 14 and 15:

    contents, learning contexts, proces

  • Page 16 and 17:

    xv these organizations do not get a

  • Page 18 and 19:

    xvii QuALIty In e-LeArnIng Before t

  • Page 20 and 21:

    allow that the teachers in training

  • Page 22 and 23:

    xxi ISO. (1986). Quality-Vocabulary

  • Page 24 and 25:

    Chapter I RAPAD: A Reflective and P

  • Page 26 and 27:

    RAPAD in fields such as law, engine

  • Page 28 and 29:

    RAPAD mystery to the new student. B

  • Page 30 and 31:

    RAPAD example, whereas Laurillard h

  • Page 32 and 33:

    RAPAD Ontologically, systems philos

  • Page 34 and 35:

    RAPAD information related processes

  • Page 36 and 37:

    RAPAD methods and techniques accord

  • Page 38 and 39:

    RAPAD 2. An introduction to learnin

  • Page 40 and 41:

    RAPAD then asked to reflect on and

  • Page 42 and 43:

    RAPAD Figure 4. A rich picture to h

  • Page 44 and 45:

    RAPAD Again using techniques from t

  • Page 46 and 47:

    RAPAD university preparation course

  • Page 48 and 49:

    RAPAD The third interface is at the

  • Page 50 and 51:

    RAPAD Knight, P.T., & Trowler, P. (

  • Page 52 and 53:

    RAPAD AddItIonAL reAdIngs Goodyear,

  • Page 54 and 55:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning t

  • Page 56 and 57:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning (

  • Page 58 and 59:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning s

  • Page 60 and 61:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning r

  • Page 62 and 63:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning o

  • Page 64 and 65:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning n

  • Page 66 and 67:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning M

  • Page 68 and 69:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning W

  • Page 70 and 71:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 72 and 73:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 74 and 75:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 76 and 77:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 78 and 79:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 80 and 81:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 82 and 83:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 84 and 85:

    Chapter IV E-Mentoring: An Extended

  • Page 86 and 87:

    E-Mentoring However, what is unders

  • Page 88 and 89:

    E-Mentoring baugh, & Williams, 2004

  • Page 90 and 91:

    E-Mentoring Table 2. Contact. Diffe

  • Page 92 and 93:

    E-Mentoring Table 10. Ethical impli

  • Page 94 and 95:

    E-Mentoring Table 15. Technology st

  • Page 96 and 97:

    E-Mentoring Table 21. Coaching. Bes

  • Page 98 and 99:

    E-Mentoring Table 27. Moment. Best

  • Page 100 and 101:

    E-Mentoring Moreover, existing rese

  • Page 102 and 103:

    E-Mentoring Kasprisin, C. A., Singl

  • Page 104 and 105:

    E-Mentoring Ensher, E. A., Heun, C.

  • Page 106 and 107:

    Chapter V Training Teachers for E-L

  • Page 108 and 109:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning FL

  • Page 110 and 111:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning ne

  • Page 112 and 113:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning A

  • Page 114 and 115:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning yo

  • Page 116 and 117:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning Di

  • Page 118 and 119:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning ht

  • Page 120 and 121:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 122 and 123:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 124 and 125:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 126 and 127:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 128 and 129:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 130 and 131:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 132 and 133:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 134 and 135:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 136 and 137:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 138 and 139:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 140 and 141:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 142 and 143:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 144 and 145:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 146 and 147:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 148 and 149:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 150 and 151:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 152 and 153:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 154 and 155:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 156 and 157:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 158 and 159:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 160 and 161:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 162 and 163:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 164 and 165:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 166 and 167:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 168 and 169:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 170 and 171:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 172 and 173:

    Chapter IX AI Techniques for Monito

  • Page 174 and 175:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 176 and 177:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 178 and 179:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 180 and 181:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 182 and 183:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 184 and 185:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 186 and 187:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 188 and 189:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 190 and 191:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 192 and 193:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 194 and 195:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 196 and 197:

    Chapter X Knowledge Discovery from

  • Page 198 and 199:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 200 and 201:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 202 and 203:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 204 and 205:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 206 and 207:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 208 and 209:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 210 and 211:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 212 and 213:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 214 and 215:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 216 and 217:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 218 and 219:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 220 and 221:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 222 and 223:

    Chapter XI Swarm-Based Techniques i

  • Page 224 and 225:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 226 and 227:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 228 and 229:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 230 and 231:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 232 and 233:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 234 and 235:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 236 and 237:

    Chapter XII E-Learning 2.0: The Lea

  • Page 238 and 239:

    E-Learning 2.0 Table 1. Different s

  • Page 240 and 241:

    E-Learning 2.0 Figure 1. Difference

  • Page 242 and 243:

    E-Learning 2.0 where the blog is al

  • Page 244 and 245:

    E-Learning 2.0 process. Along this

  • Page 246 and 247:

    E-Learning 2.0 forth, and, of cours

  • Page 248 and 249:

    E-Learning 2.0 Finally, it is impor

  • Page 250 and 251:

    E-Learning 2.0 never be a hotchpotc

  • Page 252 and 253:

    E-Learning 2.0 McPherson, K. (2006)

  • Page 254 and 255:

    E-Learning 2.0 Rosen, A. (2006). Te

  • Page 256 and 257:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 258 and 259:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 260 and 261:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 262 and 263:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 264 and 265:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 266 and 267:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 268 and 269:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 270 and 271:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 272 and 273:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 274 and 275:

    Open Source LMS Customization Intro

  • Page 276 and 277:

    Open Source LMS Customization or ev

  • Page 278 and 279:

    Open Source LMS Customization compa

  • Page 280 and 281:

    Open Source LMS Customization Figur

  • Page 282 and 283:

    Open Source LMS Customization Figur

  • Page 284 and 285:

    Open Source LMS Customization Figur

  • Page 286 and 287:

    Open Source LMS Customization Haina

  • Page 288 and 289:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning p

  • Page 290 and 291:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning r

  • Page 292 and 293:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning t

  • Page 294 and 295:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning p

  • Page 296 and 297:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning m

  • Page 298 and 299:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning c

  • Page 300 and 301:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning H

  • Page 302 and 303:

    Chapter XVI Formative Online Assess

  • Page 304 and 305:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 306 and 307:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 308 and 309:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 310 and 311:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 312 and 313:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 314 and 315:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 316 and 317:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 318 and 319:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 320 and 321: Formative Online Assessment in E-Le
  • Page 322 and 323: Formative Online Assessment in E-Le
  • Page 324 and 325: 0 Chapter XVII Designing an Online
  • Page 326 and 327: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 328 and 329: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 330 and 331: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 332 and 333: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 334 and 335: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 336 and 337: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 338 and 339: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 340 and 341: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 342 and 343: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 344 and 345: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 346 and 347: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 348 and 349: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 350 and 351: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 352 and 353: Chapter XIX E-QUAL: A Proposal to M
  • Page 354 and 355: E-QUAL is proposed to evaluate the
  • Page 356 and 357: E-QUAL provide competent, service-o
  • Page 358 and 359: E-QUAL 2004; Scalan, 2003) and qual
  • Page 360 and 361: E-QUAL benchmarks address technolog
  • Page 362 and 363: E-QUAL E-learning added two differe
  • Page 364 and 365: E-QUAL Table 6. Application of the
  • Page 366 and 367: E-QUAL Future trends The future of
  • Page 368 and 369: E-QUAL (EQO) co-located to the 4 th
  • Page 372 and 373: E-QUAL Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality
  • Page 374 and 375: Compilation of References Argyris,
  • Page 376 and 377: Compilation of References Biggs, J.
  • Page 378 and 379: Compilation of References Cabero, J
  • Page 380 and 381: Compilation of References Comezaña
  • Page 382 and 383: Compilation of References Downes, S
  • Page 384 and 385: Compilation of References Fandos, M
  • Page 386 and 387: Compilation of References national
  • Page 388 and 389: Compilation of References Hudson, B
  • Page 390 and 391: Compilation of References Harbour.
  • Page 392 and 393: Compilation of References Little, J
  • Page 394 and 395: Compilation of References Metros, S
  • Page 396 and 397: Compilation of References ONeill, K
  • Page 398 and 399: Compilation of References Preece, J
  • Page 400 and 401: Compilation of References Sadler, D
  • Page 402 and 403: Compilation of References Shin, N.,
  • Page 404 and 405: Compilation of References tional Co
  • Page 406 and 407: Compilation of References Vermetten
  • Page 408 and 409: Compilation of References Yu, F. Y.
  • Page 410 and 411: About the Contributors Juan Pablo d
  • Page 412 and 413: About the Contributors part: “An
  • Page 414 and 415: About the Contributors María D. R-
  • Page 416 and 417: About the Contributors Applications
  • Page 418 and 419: Index e-learning tools, automated p
  • Page 420:

    Socrates 55 Sophists 55 student-foc

Non-inferiority trials: advances in concepts and methodology
TOP - IRC - ACT - Advanced Communication Technologies
The Quality Turn. Political and Methodological Challenges in ...
October 2007 Volume 10 Number 4 - Educational Technology ...
Advancing Collaborative Learning with ICT - The ICT Connection ...
Organizational Change Management Methodology
ADVANCES
ROI Methodology for e-Learning Courses - Cecoa
Learn Hay Group's world renowned methodologies
Mentor update2 - Advancing your mentoring role
MTM Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience in Ambulatory Care
SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS: - Advanced Learning Institute
INNOVATIVE LEARNING MODELS
Lexicon of Online and Distance Learning - PEEF's Digital Library
Download Methodology Report - Ministry of Fisheries
proceedings of Student Mobility and ICT: Can E-LEARNING
e-Learning for Lifelong Learning in Denmark
DIRECTOR OF UCL CENTRE FOR ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING AND TEACHING ...
UNDERSTANDING PROJECT BASED LEARNING
Cameron final report 2009 - Office for Learning and Teaching
Advancing Agricultural Leadership on Sustainability
The Joy of Learning - ACT - Advanced Communication Technologies
Advanced Communication and Conflict - IneedCE.com
Methodology for Monitoring and Assessment of the Level of ...
Online Advanced Placement Courses - WICHE
Wellbeing and involvement; Experience Oriented Education ...