Views
2 months ago

Advances in E-learning-Experiences and Methodologies

E-QUAL (EQO) co-located

E-QUAL (EQO) co-located to the 4 th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Joensuu: European Quality Observatory. EIfEL. (2007). About SEEL, Supporting excellence in e-learning. European Institute for e-Learning. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.eife-l.org/activities/projects/seel ELEX. (2005). EXEMPLO e-learning project. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://217.222.182.72/html/iess/pt.htm eQCheck. (2006). Qualite-learning assurance services ltd. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.eqcheck.co.uk EQO. (2007). European quality observatory. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www. eqo.info EQUEL. (2004). Virtual European centre in e-learning. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://equel.net EQUIPE. (2007). Aims & objectives. European Quality in Individualised Pathways in Education. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www. EQUIPE.up.pt/equipe/objectives.htm European Commission. (2003). E-learning programme, Education. Programmes, Europe. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://ec.europa. eu/education/programmes/e-Learning/programme_en.html# European Commission. (2005). E-learning, designing education tomorrow. Report on the consultation workshop. The “e” for our universities—Virtual campus. Organisational changes and economics models. DRAFT. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture. Figueiredo, A. D. (2002). Redes e Educação: A Surpreendente Riqueza de um Conceito. In Conselho Nacional de Educação (Ed.), Redes de Aprendizagem, Redes de Conhecimento. Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educação. Hollands, N. (2000). Online testing: Best practices from the field. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://198.85.71.76/english/blackboard/testingadvice.html Husson, A. (2004). Comparing quality models adequacy to the needs of clients in e-learning. In Quality in European E-Learning Designing Tools and Frameworks for Tomorrows Quality Development, Workshop European Quality Observatory (EQO) co-located to the 4 th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Joensuu: European Quality Observatory. IITT. (2005). Institute of IT training. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.iitt.org.uk ISO. (2003). ISO standards compendium ISO 9000 – quality management (10 th ed.). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. ISO. (2005). ISO/IEC standard benchmarks quality of e-learning. International Standard Organization. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.iso.org/iso/en/commcentre/pressreleases/2006/ref992.html Juran, J. M. (1988). Quality control handbook. New York: McGraw Hill. LIfIA & EIfEL. (2004). Open e-quality learning standards. Joint e-quality committee of LIfIA (Learning Innovations Forum d’Innovation d’Apprentissage) and EIfEL (European Institute for e-Learning). Marques, C. (2004). E-learning: Uma nova forma de aprender. Revista e-Ciência, 1(1), 23. MENON Network EEIG. (2004). Sustainable environment for the evaluation of quality in e- learning. SEEQUEL core quality framework. E-Learning Initiative, European Commission. NADE. (2001). Quality standards for distance education. Norwegian Association for Distance and Flexible Education. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.nade-nff.no/nff2/filer/ Kvalitet/Kvalitetsnormer%20for%20fjernunde rvisning.pdf

E-QUAL ODLQC. (2006). Open and distance learning quality council standards. Open and Distance Learning Quality Council. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.odlqc.org.uk/standard. doc Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Washington: IHEP - Institute for Higher Education Policy. QAA. (2004). Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education (2 nd ed.). Mansfield: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Qual E-Learning Project Consortium. (2003). Qual-e-learning project. Qual E-Learning Project Consortium. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.qual-e-Learning.net/cgi/index. php?wpage=overview Qual E-Learning Project Consortium. (2004). Handbook of best practices for the evaluation of e-learning effectiveness. Qual e-Learning Project Consortium. Qual E-Learning Project Consortium. (2007) Qual e-learning evaluation tool. Qual-e-Learning Project. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.qual-e-Learning.net/cgi/index.php Rekkedal, T. (2006). Distance learning and e- learning quality for SMEs—State of the art. Paper prepared for the EU Leonardo Project, E-learning Quality for SMEs: Guidance and Counselling. Ruttenbur, B., Spickler, G., & Lurie, S. (2000). E- learning—The engine of the knowledge economy. New York: Morgan Keegan & Co. Scalan, C. L. (2003). Reliability and validity of a student scale for assessing the quality of Internet-based distance learning. Distance Learning Administration, VII (III). Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ ojdla/fall63/scanlan63.html SEEL. (2004). Quality guidelines for learning strategy and innovation, version 3. Supporting Excellence in E-Learning. Seufert, S., & Euler, D. (2005). Nachhaltigkeit von e-Learning-Innovationen: Fallstudien zu Implementierungsstrategien von e-Learning als Innovationen an Hochschulen. St. Gallen: Swiss Centre for Innovations in Learning. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.scil.ch/publications/docs/2005-01-seufert-euler-nachhaltigkeit-e-Learning.pdf SEVAQ. (2005). Self evaluation for quality in e-learning. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.sevaq.com SPI. (2003). Empre-learning: Promoção de Estruturas de e-Learning Inovadores, em Língua Portuguesa, que Permitam o Aumento de Competências e Aumentem a Empregabilidade. Porto: Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação. TISIP. (2007). QUIS—Quality, interoperability and standards in e-learning. Trondheim: TISIP Research Foundation. Ullmo, P. -A., & Ehlers, U. -D. (2007). Quality in e-learning. E-Learning Papers, 2. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.e-Learningpapers.eu/index.php?page=volume Wright, C. R. (2003). Criteria for evaluating the quality of online courses. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.imd.macewan.ca/imd/content.php?contentid=36 AddItIonAL reAdIng ACE. (2001). Distance learning evaluation guide. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Artur, A. C., Coll, J., Fagerberg, T., Leeuwen, R. J. M. V., Liikane, K., Liivrand, A. et al. (2006). State of the art report on e-learning quality for

  • Page 2 and 3:

    Advances in E-Learning: Experiences

  • Page 4 and 5:

    Table of Contents Preface .........

  • Page 6 and 7:

    Chapter XIV Open Source LMS Customi

  • Page 8 and 9:

    Chapter III Philosophical and Epist

  • Page 10 and 11:

    of constructive and cooperative met

  • Page 12 and 13:

    Chapter XIV Open Source LMS Customi

  • Page 14 and 15:

    contents, learning contexts, proces

  • Page 16 and 17:

    xv these organizations do not get a

  • Page 18 and 19:

    xvii QuALIty In e-LeArnIng Before t

  • Page 20 and 21:

    allow that the teachers in training

  • Page 22 and 23:

    xxi ISO. (1986). Quality-Vocabulary

  • Page 24 and 25:

    Chapter I RAPAD: A Reflective and P

  • Page 26 and 27:

    RAPAD in fields such as law, engine

  • Page 28 and 29:

    RAPAD mystery to the new student. B

  • Page 30 and 31:

    RAPAD example, whereas Laurillard h

  • Page 32 and 33:

    RAPAD Ontologically, systems philos

  • Page 34 and 35:

    RAPAD information related processes

  • Page 36 and 37:

    RAPAD methods and techniques accord

  • Page 38 and 39:

    RAPAD 2. An introduction to learnin

  • Page 40 and 41:

    RAPAD then asked to reflect on and

  • Page 42 and 43:

    RAPAD Figure 4. A rich picture to h

  • Page 44 and 45:

    RAPAD Again using techniques from t

  • Page 46 and 47:

    RAPAD university preparation course

  • Page 48 and 49:

    RAPAD The third interface is at the

  • Page 50 and 51:

    RAPAD Knight, P.T., & Trowler, P. (

  • Page 52 and 53:

    RAPAD AddItIonAL reAdIngs Goodyear,

  • Page 54 and 55:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning t

  • Page 56 and 57:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning (

  • Page 58 and 59:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning s

  • Page 60 and 61:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning r

  • Page 62 and 63:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning o

  • Page 64 and 65:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning n

  • Page 66 and 67:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning M

  • Page 68 and 69:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning W

  • Page 70 and 71:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 72 and 73:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 74 and 75:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 76 and 77:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 78 and 79:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 80 and 81:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 82 and 83:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 84 and 85:

    Chapter IV E-Mentoring: An Extended

  • Page 86 and 87:

    E-Mentoring However, what is unders

  • Page 88 and 89:

    E-Mentoring baugh, & Williams, 2004

  • Page 90 and 91:

    E-Mentoring Table 2. Contact. Diffe

  • Page 92 and 93:

    E-Mentoring Table 10. Ethical impli

  • Page 94 and 95:

    E-Mentoring Table 15. Technology st

  • Page 96 and 97:

    E-Mentoring Table 21. Coaching. Bes

  • Page 98 and 99:

    E-Mentoring Table 27. Moment. Best

  • Page 100 and 101:

    E-Mentoring Moreover, existing rese

  • Page 102 and 103:

    E-Mentoring Kasprisin, C. A., Singl

  • Page 104 and 105:

    E-Mentoring Ensher, E. A., Heun, C.

  • Page 106 and 107:

    Chapter V Training Teachers for E-L

  • Page 108 and 109:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning FL

  • Page 110 and 111:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning ne

  • Page 112 and 113:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning A

  • Page 114 and 115:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning yo

  • Page 116 and 117:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning Di

  • Page 118 and 119:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning ht

  • Page 120 and 121:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 122 and 123:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 124 and 125:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 126 and 127:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 128 and 129:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 130 and 131:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 132 and 133:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 134 and 135:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 136 and 137:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 138 and 139:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 140 and 141:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 142 and 143:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 144 and 145:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 146 and 147:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 148 and 149:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 150 and 151:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 152 and 153:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 154 and 155:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 156 and 157:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 158 and 159:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 160 and 161:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 162 and 163:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 164 and 165:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 166 and 167:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 168 and 169:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 170 and 171:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 172 and 173:

    Chapter IX AI Techniques for Monito

  • Page 174 and 175:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 176 and 177:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 178 and 179:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 180 and 181:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 182 and 183:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 184 and 185:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 186 and 187:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 188 and 189:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 190 and 191:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 192 and 193:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 194 and 195:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 196 and 197:

    Chapter X Knowledge Discovery from

  • Page 198 and 199:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 200 and 201:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 202 and 203:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 204 and 205:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 206 and 207:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 208 and 209:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 210 and 211:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 212 and 213:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 214 and 215:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 216 and 217:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 218 and 219:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 220 and 221:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 222 and 223:

    Chapter XI Swarm-Based Techniques i

  • Page 224 and 225:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 226 and 227:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 228 and 229:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 230 and 231:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 232 and 233:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 234 and 235:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 236 and 237:

    Chapter XII E-Learning 2.0: The Lea

  • Page 238 and 239:

    E-Learning 2.0 Table 1. Different s

  • Page 240 and 241:

    E-Learning 2.0 Figure 1. Difference

  • Page 242 and 243:

    E-Learning 2.0 where the blog is al

  • Page 244 and 245:

    E-Learning 2.0 process. Along this

  • Page 246 and 247:

    E-Learning 2.0 forth, and, of cours

  • Page 248 and 249:

    E-Learning 2.0 Finally, it is impor

  • Page 250 and 251:

    E-Learning 2.0 never be a hotchpotc

  • Page 252 and 253:

    E-Learning 2.0 McPherson, K. (2006)

  • Page 254 and 255:

    E-Learning 2.0 Rosen, A. (2006). Te

  • Page 256 and 257:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 258 and 259:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 260 and 261:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 262 and 263:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 264 and 265:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 266 and 267:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 268 and 269:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 270 and 271:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 272 and 273:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 274 and 275:

    Open Source LMS Customization Intro

  • Page 276 and 277:

    Open Source LMS Customization or ev

  • Page 278 and 279:

    Open Source LMS Customization compa

  • Page 280 and 281:

    Open Source LMS Customization Figur

  • Page 282 and 283:

    Open Source LMS Customization Figur

  • Page 284 and 285:

    Open Source LMS Customization Figur

  • Page 286 and 287:

    Open Source LMS Customization Haina

  • Page 288 and 289:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning p

  • Page 290 and 291:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning r

  • Page 292 and 293:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning t

  • Page 294 and 295:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning p

  • Page 296 and 297:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning m

  • Page 298 and 299:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning c

  • Page 300 and 301:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning H

  • Page 302 and 303:

    Chapter XVI Formative Online Assess

  • Page 304 and 305:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 306 and 307:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 308 and 309:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 310 and 311:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 312 and 313:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 314 and 315:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 316 and 317:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 318 and 319: Formative Online Assessment in E-Le
  • Page 320 and 321: Formative Online Assessment in E-Le
  • Page 322 and 323: Formative Online Assessment in E-Le
  • Page 324 and 325: 0 Chapter XVII Designing an Online
  • Page 326 and 327: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 328 and 329: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 330 and 331: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 332 and 333: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 334 and 335: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 336 and 337: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 338 and 339: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 340 and 341: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 342 and 343: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 344 and 345: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 346 and 347: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 348 and 349: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 350 and 351: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 352 and 353: Chapter XIX E-QUAL: A Proposal to M
  • Page 354 and 355: E-QUAL is proposed to evaluate the
  • Page 356 and 357: E-QUAL provide competent, service-o
  • Page 358 and 359: E-QUAL 2004; Scalan, 2003) and qual
  • Page 360 and 361: E-QUAL benchmarks address technolog
  • Page 362 and 363: E-QUAL E-learning added two differe
  • Page 364 and 365: E-QUAL Table 6. Application of the
  • Page 366 and 367: E-QUAL Future trends The future of
  • Page 370 and 371: E-QUAL SMEs: An analysis of e-learn
  • Page 372 and 373: E-QUAL Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality
  • Page 374 and 375: Compilation of References Argyris,
  • Page 376 and 377: Compilation of References Biggs, J.
  • Page 378 and 379: Compilation of References Cabero, J
  • Page 380 and 381: Compilation of References Comezaña
  • Page 382 and 383: Compilation of References Downes, S
  • Page 384 and 385: Compilation of References Fandos, M
  • Page 386 and 387: Compilation of References national
  • Page 388 and 389: Compilation of References Hudson, B
  • Page 390 and 391: Compilation of References Harbour.
  • Page 392 and 393: Compilation of References Little, J
  • Page 394 and 395: Compilation of References Metros, S
  • Page 396 and 397: Compilation of References ONeill, K
  • Page 398 and 399: Compilation of References Preece, J
  • Page 400 and 401: Compilation of References Sadler, D
  • Page 402 and 403: Compilation of References Shin, N.,
  • Page 404 and 405: Compilation of References tional Co
  • Page 406 and 407: Compilation of References Vermetten
  • Page 408 and 409: Compilation of References Yu, F. Y.
  • Page 410 and 411: About the Contributors Juan Pablo d
  • Page 412 and 413: About the Contributors part: “An
  • Page 414 and 415: About the Contributors María D. R-
  • Page 416 and 417: About the Contributors Applications
  • Page 418 and 419:

    Index e-learning tools, automated p

  • Page 420:

    Socrates 55 Sophists 55 student-foc

MTM Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience in Ambulatory Care
The Joy of Learning - ACT - Advanced Communication Technologies
Methodology for Monitoring and Assessment of the Level of ...
slides - Advanced Distributed Learning
What is the student experience of learning in practice? - ECE
A Study of Community Hazard Risk Assessment Methodologies - Ning
Teacher's Handbook on e-Assessment - Office for Learning and ...
URBAN HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY (UrHIA)
URBAN HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY (UrHIA)
Methodological Framework for Vulnerability ... - SEA Change CoP
Reading 2009 - African American Communication and Collaboration ...
October 2009 Volume 12 Number 4 - Educational Technology ...
Advancing Equity through More and Better STEM Learning
Getting Started With Blended Learning ( PDF 2.7 ... - Griffith University
POLICY APPROACHES TO ADVANCING PERSON-CENTERED OUTCOME MEASUREMENT
PDF: Advances in the Management of Dupuytren's ... - CMEcorner.com
ADVANCES in DATA NETWORKS - Wseas.us
Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching
Cooperative Learning - NIE Digital Repository - National Institute of ...
advance at North Seattle Community College - Faculty and Staff ...
Risk Analysis: Advancing Analysis - The Society for Risk Analysis
The Quality Turn. Political and Methodological Challenges in ...
Special Education Directors' Meeting - ESC2 Special Education
TOP - IRC - ACT - Advanced Communication Technologies
Non-inferiority trials: advances in concepts and methodology
Teaching and Assessing Soft Skills - MASS - Measuring and ...
October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4
October 2006 Volume 9 Number 4 - CiteSeerX
Professional Learning Program - Lexington Public Schools
Talking About Learning - South East European University