Views
10 months ago

Advances in E-learning-Experiences and Methodologies

Compilation of

Compilation of References Hudson, B. (2005). Conditions for achieving communication, interaction and collaboration in e-learning environments. E-Learningeuropa.info. Retrieved October 18, 2007, from http://www.e-Learningeuropa. info/index.php?page=doc&doc_id=6494&doclng=7& menuzone=1 Hunt, L. M., Thomas, M. J. W., & Eagle, L. (2002). Student resistance to ICT in education. In R. Kinshuk, K. Lewis, R. Akahori, T. Kemp, L. Okamoto, C. Henderson & H. Lee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9 th International Conference on Computers in Education (Vol. 2, pp. 964-968), Auckland, New Zealand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. HUSAT. (1990). The HUFIT planning, analysis and specification toolset. Loughborough: HUSAT Research Institute, Loughborough University. Husson, A. (2004). Comparing quality models adequacy to the needs of clients in e-learning. In Quality in European E-Learning Designing Tools and Frameworks for Tomorrows Quality Development, Workshop European Quality Observatory (EQO) co-located to the 4 th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Joensuu: European Quality Observatory. Hutchins, T., Sims, M., & Cooper, T. (1999). Developing a portfolio which demonstrates competencies. In M. Sims & T. Hutchins (Eds.), Learning materials: Certificate in children’s services; 0-6 years (bilingual support) (pp. 3-29). Perth, WA: Ethnic Childcare Resource Inc. Western Australia. Hyde, P., Booth R., & Wilson, P. (2003). The development of quality online assessment in VET. In H. Guthrie (Ed.), Online learning: Research readings (pp. 87-106). Leabrook, South Australia: NCVER. Hyland, B. (2002). Cone of learning. From the course “Train the trainer”. Iowa Center for Public Health Preparedness. Retrieved October 26, 2007, from http:// www.public-health.uiowa.edu/icphp/ed_training/ttt/archive/2002/2002_course_materials/Cone_of_Learning. pdf Hyvärinen, A., & Oja, E. (1998). A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Computation, 9(7), 1483-1492. Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., & Oja, E. (2001). Independent Component Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Ibabe, I., & Jauregizar, J. (2005). Ejercicios de autoevaluación con Hot Potatoes. In I. Ibabe & J. Jauregizar (Eds.), Cómo crear una web docente de calidad (pp. 65-100). A Coruña, Spain: Netbiblo. Ibabe, I., Gómez J., & Jauregizar, J. (2006). Aplicación de pruebas de auto-evaluación interactivas para potenciar el trabajo autónomo de los estudiantes conforme al sistema ECTS. In J. Guisasola & T. Nuño (Eds.), La educación universitaria en tiempos de cambio (pp. 63-74). San Sebastián, Spain: Universidad del País Vasco. IITT. (2005). Institute of IT training. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.iitt.org.uk Ilghami, O., & Nau, D.S. (2003). A general approach to synthesize problem-specific planners (Tech. Rep. CS-TR-4597). University of Maryland: Department of Computer Science. IMS CP. (2006). Retrieved October 22, 2007, from http://www.imsglobal.org/content/packaging/ IMS LD, IMS Learning Design. (2006). IMS Global Learning Consortium. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.html IMSSS, IMS Simple Sequencing. (2006). Retrieved October 22, 2007, from http://www.imsglobal.org/simplesequencing/index.html Inglis, A. (1999). Is online delivery less costly than print and is it meaningful to ask? Distance Education, 20(2), 220-232. Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000). Quality on the line. Retrieved October 19, 2007, from http://www. ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Quality.pdf/ Intelligent Web Teacher. (2006). Retrieved October 21, 2007, from http://www.momanet.it/english/iwt_eng. html

Compilation of References ISO. (2003). ISO standards compendium ISO 9000–quality management (10 th ed.). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. ISO. (2005). ISO/IEC standard benchmarks quality of e- learning. International Standard Organization. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.iso.org/iso/en/commcentre/pressreleases/2006/ref992.html ITC. (2003). Online assessment techniques. Retrieved October 29, 2007, from http://web.utk.edu/~dsuppach/ indep/assessment2.htm. Jaeger, W. (1945). Paideia: The ideals of Greek culture (G. Highet, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press. James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities. Canberra, Australia: Center for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne & The Australian Universities Teaching Committee. Jennings, D. (2005). E-learning 2.0, whatever that is. Retrieved October 18, 2007, from http://alchemi.co.uk/ archives/ele/e-Learning_20_wh.html Johnes, J., & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance indicators in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Johnson, R., & Johnson, D. W. (1998). Cooperative learning. Two heads learn better than one. Transforming Education, 18, 34. Johnson-Bogart, K. (1995). Writing portfolios: What teachers learn from students self-assessment. In Washington Centre’s Evaluation Committee (Ed.), Assessment in and of collaborative learning. Washington: Washington Centre for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988). The personnel evaluation standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale. Jonassen, D.H., & Grabowski, B.L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Jones, E. R., (2002). Implications of SCORM and emerging e-learning standards on engineering education. In ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference (pp. 20-22). Juran, J. M. (1988). Quality control handbook. New York: McGraw Hill. Juran, J.M., & Gyrna, F.M. Jr. (1988). Juran’s quality control handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill. Karrer, T. (2006, February 10). What is e-learning 2.0. E-Learning Technology. Retrieved October 18, 2007, from http://e-Learningtech.blogspot.com/2006/02/whatis-e-Learning-20.html Kasprisin, C. A., Single, P. B., Single, R. M., & Muller, C. B. (2003). Building a better bridge: Testing e-training to improve e-mentoring programmes in higher education. Mentoring and Tutoring, 11(1). Kassabova, D., & Trounson, R. (2000). Applying soft systems methodology for user centred design. In Proceedings of the NACCQ 2000 (pp. 159-165). Wellington. Kauffman, S. (1996). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press. Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Kendle, A., & Northcote, M. (2000). The struggle for balance in the use of quantitative and qualitative online assessment tasks. In Proceedings ASCILITE 2000, Coffs

  • Page 2 and 3:

    Advances in E-Learning: Experiences

  • Page 4 and 5:

    Table of Contents Preface .........

  • Page 6 and 7:

    Chapter XIV Open Source LMS Customi

  • Page 8 and 9:

    Chapter III Philosophical and Epist

  • Page 10 and 11:

    of constructive and cooperative met

  • Page 12 and 13:

    Chapter XIV Open Source LMS Customi

  • Page 14 and 15:

    contents, learning contexts, proces

  • Page 16 and 17:

    xv these organizations do not get a

  • Page 18 and 19:

    xvii QuALIty In e-LeArnIng Before t

  • Page 20 and 21:

    allow that the teachers in training

  • Page 22 and 23:

    xxi ISO. (1986). Quality-Vocabulary

  • Page 24 and 25:

    Chapter I RAPAD: A Reflective and P

  • Page 26 and 27:

    RAPAD in fields such as law, engine

  • Page 28 and 29:

    RAPAD mystery to the new student. B

  • Page 30 and 31:

    RAPAD example, whereas Laurillard h

  • Page 32 and 33:

    RAPAD Ontologically, systems philos

  • Page 34 and 35:

    RAPAD information related processes

  • Page 36 and 37:

    RAPAD methods and techniques accord

  • Page 38 and 39:

    RAPAD 2. An introduction to learnin

  • Page 40 and 41:

    RAPAD then asked to reflect on and

  • Page 42 and 43:

    RAPAD Figure 4. A rich picture to h

  • Page 44 and 45:

    RAPAD Again using techniques from t

  • Page 46 and 47:

    RAPAD university preparation course

  • Page 48 and 49:

    RAPAD The third interface is at the

  • Page 50 and 51:

    RAPAD Knight, P.T., & Trowler, P. (

  • Page 52 and 53:

    RAPAD AddItIonAL reAdIngs Goodyear,

  • Page 54 and 55:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning t

  • Page 56 and 57:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning (

  • Page 58 and 59:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning s

  • Page 60 and 61:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning r

  • Page 62 and 63:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning o

  • Page 64 and 65:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning n

  • Page 66 and 67:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning M

  • Page 68 and 69:

    A Heideggerian View on E-Learning W

  • Page 70 and 71:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 72 and 73:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 74 and 75:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 76 and 77:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 78 and 79:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 80 and 81:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 82 and 83:

    Philisophical and Epistemological B

  • Page 84 and 85:

    Chapter IV E-Mentoring: An Extended

  • Page 86 and 87:

    E-Mentoring However, what is unders

  • Page 88 and 89:

    E-Mentoring baugh, & Williams, 2004

  • Page 90 and 91:

    E-Mentoring Table 2. Contact. Diffe

  • Page 92 and 93:

    E-Mentoring Table 10. Ethical impli

  • Page 94 and 95:

    E-Mentoring Table 15. Technology st

  • Page 96 and 97:

    E-Mentoring Table 21. Coaching. Bes

  • Page 98 and 99:

    E-Mentoring Table 27. Moment. Best

  • Page 100 and 101:

    E-Mentoring Moreover, existing rese

  • Page 102 and 103:

    E-Mentoring Kasprisin, C. A., Singl

  • Page 104 and 105:

    E-Mentoring Ensher, E. A., Heun, C.

  • Page 106 and 107:

    Chapter V Training Teachers for E-L

  • Page 108 and 109:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning FL

  • Page 110 and 111:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning ne

  • Page 112 and 113:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning A

  • Page 114 and 115:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning yo

  • Page 116 and 117:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning Di

  • Page 118 and 119:

    Training Teachers for E-Learning ht

  • Page 120 and 121:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 122 and 123:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 124 and 125:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 126 and 127:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 128 and 129:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 130 and 131:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 132 and 133:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 134 and 135:

    The Role of Institutional Factors i

  • Page 136 and 137:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 138 and 139:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 140 and 141:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 142 and 143:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 144 and 145:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 146 and 147:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 148 and 149:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 150 and 151:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 152 and 153:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 154 and 155:

    E-Learning Value and Student Experi

  • Page 156 and 157:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 158 and 159:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 160 and 161:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 162 and 163:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 164 and 165:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 166 and 167:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 168 and 169:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 170 and 171:

    Integrating Technology and Research

  • Page 172 and 173:

    Chapter IX AI Techniques for Monito

  • Page 174 and 175:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 176 and 177:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 178 and 179:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 180 and 181:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 182 and 183:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 184 and 185:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 186 and 187:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 188 and 189:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 190 and 191:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 192 and 193:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 194 and 195:

    AI Techniques for Monitoring Studen

  • Page 196 and 197:

    Chapter X Knowledge Discovery from

  • Page 198 and 199:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 200 and 201:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 202 and 203:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 204 and 205:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 206 and 207:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 208 and 209:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 210 and 211:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 212 and 213:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 214 and 215:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 216 and 217:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 218 and 219:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 220 and 221:

    Knowledge Discovery from E-Learning

  • Page 222 and 223:

    Chapter XI Swarm-Based Techniques i

  • Page 224 and 225:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 226 and 227:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 228 and 229:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 230 and 231:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 232 and 233:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 234 and 235:

    Swarm-Based Techniques in E-Learnin

  • Page 236 and 237:

    Chapter XII E-Learning 2.0: The Lea

  • Page 238 and 239:

    E-Learning 2.0 Table 1. Different s

  • Page 240 and 241:

    E-Learning 2.0 Figure 1. Difference

  • Page 242 and 243:

    E-Learning 2.0 where the blog is al

  • Page 244 and 245:

    E-Learning 2.0 process. Along this

  • Page 246 and 247:

    E-Learning 2.0 forth, and, of cours

  • Page 248 and 249:

    E-Learning 2.0 Finally, it is impor

  • Page 250 and 251:

    E-Learning 2.0 never be a hotchpotc

  • Page 252 and 253:

    E-Learning 2.0 McPherson, K. (2006)

  • Page 254 and 255:

    E-Learning 2.0 Rosen, A. (2006). Te

  • Page 256 and 257:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 258 and 259:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 260 and 261:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 262 and 263:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 264 and 265:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 266 and 267:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 268 and 269:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 270 and 271:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 272 and 273:

    Telematic Environments and Competit

  • Page 274 and 275:

    Open Source LMS Customization Intro

  • Page 276 and 277:

    Open Source LMS Customization or ev

  • Page 278 and 279:

    Open Source LMS Customization compa

  • Page 280 and 281:

    Open Source LMS Customization Figur

  • Page 282 and 283:

    Open Source LMS Customization Figur

  • Page 284 and 285:

    Open Source LMS Customization Figur

  • Page 286 and 287:

    Open Source LMS Customization Haina

  • Page 288 and 289:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning p

  • Page 290 and 291:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning r

  • Page 292 and 293:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning t

  • Page 294 and 295:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning p

  • Page 296 and 297:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning m

  • Page 298 and 299:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning c

  • Page 300 and 301:

    Evaluation and Effective Learning H

  • Page 302 and 303:

    Chapter XVI Formative Online Assess

  • Page 304 and 305:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 306 and 307:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 308 and 309:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 310 and 311:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 312 and 313:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 314 and 315:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 316 and 317:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 318 and 319:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 320 and 321:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 322 and 323:

    Formative Online Assessment in E-Le

  • Page 324 and 325:

    0 Chapter XVII Designing an Online

  • Page 326 and 327:

    Designing an Online Assessment in E

  • Page 328 and 329:

    Designing an Online Assessment in E

  • Page 330 and 331:

    Designing an Online Assessment in E

  • Page 332 and 333:

    Designing an Online Assessment in E

  • Page 334 and 335:

    Designing an Online Assessment in E

  • Page 336 and 337:

    Designing an Online Assessment in E

  • Page 338 and 339: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 340 and 341: Designing an Online Assessment in E
  • Page 342 and 343: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 344 and 345: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 346 and 347: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 348 and 349: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 350 and 351: Quality Assessment of E-Facilitator
  • Page 352 and 353: Chapter XIX E-QUAL: A Proposal to M
  • Page 354 and 355: E-QUAL is proposed to evaluate the
  • Page 356 and 357: E-QUAL provide competent, service-o
  • Page 358 and 359: E-QUAL 2004; Scalan, 2003) and qual
  • Page 360 and 361: E-QUAL benchmarks address technolog
  • Page 362 and 363: E-QUAL E-learning added two differe
  • Page 364 and 365: E-QUAL Table 6. Application of the
  • Page 366 and 367: E-QUAL Future trends The future of
  • Page 368 and 369: E-QUAL (EQO) co-located to the 4 th
  • Page 370 and 371: E-QUAL SMEs: An analysis of e-learn
  • Page 372 and 373: E-QUAL Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality
  • Page 374 and 375: Compilation of References Argyris,
  • Page 376 and 377: Compilation of References Biggs, J.
  • Page 378 and 379: Compilation of References Cabero, J
  • Page 380 and 381: Compilation of References Comezaña
  • Page 382 and 383: Compilation of References Downes, S
  • Page 384 and 385: Compilation of References Fandos, M
  • Page 386 and 387: Compilation of References national
  • Page 390 and 391: Compilation of References Harbour.
  • Page 392 and 393: Compilation of References Little, J
  • Page 394 and 395: Compilation of References Metros, S
  • Page 396 and 397: Compilation of References ONeill, K
  • Page 398 and 399: Compilation of References Preece, J
  • Page 400 and 401: Compilation of References Sadler, D
  • Page 402 and 403: Compilation of References Shin, N.,
  • Page 404 and 405: Compilation of References tional Co
  • Page 406 and 407: Compilation of References Vermetten
  • Page 408 and 409: Compilation of References Yu, F. Y.
  • Page 410 and 411: About the Contributors Juan Pablo d
  • Page 412 and 413: About the Contributors part: “An
  • Page 414 and 415: About the Contributors María D. R-
  • Page 416 and 417: About the Contributors Applications
  • Page 418 and 419: Index e-learning tools, automated p
  • Page 420: Socrates 55 Sophists 55 student-foc
The Quality Turn. Political and Methodological Challenges in ...
Organizational Change Management Methodology
Non-inferiority trials: advances in concepts and methodology
DIRECTOR OF UCL CENTRE FOR ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING AND TEACHING ...
TOP - IRC - ACT - Advanced Communication Technologies
ADVANCES
ROI Methodology for e-Learning Courses - Cecoa
MTM Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience in Ambulatory Care
Overview of ISU Learning Communities
Lexicon of Online and Distance Learning - PEEF's Digital Library
Download Methodology Report - Ministry of Fisheries
proceedings of Student Mobility and ICT: Can E-LEARNING
The Joy of Learning - ACT - Advanced Communication Technologies
Methodology for Monitoring and Assessment of the Level of ...
Online Advanced Placement Courses - WICHE
slides - Advanced Distributed Learning
What is the student experience of learning in practice? - ECE
A Study of Community Hazard Risk Assessment Methodologies - Ning
Mentor update2 - Advancing your mentoring role
AMR Corporation Risk Assessment Methodology - IIA Dallas Chapter
Global Learn - Association for the Advancement of Computing in ...
SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS: - Advanced Learning Institute
Teacher's Handbook on e-Assessment - Office for Learning and ...
Professional Development - Vol. IV, Part I
blended learning activities for advanced proficiency in listening
October 2007 Volume 10 Number 4 - Educational Technology ...