22.12.2012 Views

Security in Space The Next Generation - UNIDIR

Security in Space The Next Generation - UNIDIR

Security in Space The Next Generation - UNIDIR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

164<br />

two specifi c ASAT activities: test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> outer space and use <strong>in</strong> combat. (A<br />

comprehensive ASAT treaty might well seek to regulate other aspects of<br />

the weapons-development cycle, too, such as the research, development,<br />

possession and deployment of ASATs, but for present purposes, it will be<br />

suffi cient to focus on test<strong>in</strong>g and use.)<br />

What do we observe about the actual pattern of state behaviour <strong>in</strong> this<br />

area? First, regard<strong>in</strong>g space test<strong>in</strong>g of ASAT devices, we have a reasonably<br />

public history to scrut<strong>in</strong>ize. <strong>The</strong> United States tested two ma<strong>in</strong> types of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terceptor vehicles approximately 30 times from the late 1950s through<br />

the early 1970s, and the Soviet Union tested its <strong>in</strong>terceptor anti-satellite<br />

vehicle a total of approximately 20 times from 1968 to 1971 and from 1976<br />

to 1982. <strong>The</strong> United States also conducted two tests of a rather different<br />

sort of <strong>in</strong>terceptor <strong>in</strong> 1984 aga<strong>in</strong>st unoccupied po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> outer space, and<br />

one test aga<strong>in</strong>st a target satellite <strong>in</strong> 1985. Ch<strong>in</strong>a became the third state to<br />

destroy a satellite <strong>in</strong> orbit, with a couple of exercises that did not <strong>in</strong>volve<br />

collisions, and one, on 11 January 2007, that did impact and destroy its<br />

target. Most recently, on 20 February 2008, the United States employed<br />

a modifi ed ballistic missile <strong>in</strong>terceptor to destroy a fail<strong>in</strong>g reconnaissance<br />

satellite as it re-entered the Earth’s atmosphere.<br />

In addition, these three have also explored systems based on high-energy<br />

lasers or other directed-energy technologies, rather than on physical<br />

<strong>in</strong>terceptors. <strong>The</strong> most conspicuous illustration of such was the 1997 US<br />

experiment with the MIRACL (Mid-InfraRed Advanced Chemical Laser),<br />

based <strong>in</strong> New Mexico. That test, <strong>in</strong>tended to assess the extent to which a<br />

powerful ground-based energy beam system could locate, track, illum<strong>in</strong>ate,<br />

and damage, disrupt, or destroy an orbit<strong>in</strong>g satellite, has still not been fully<br />

described to the public. <strong>The</strong> possible laser systems of other countries have<br />

been even more shrouded from public view. <strong>The</strong> Soviet Union allegedly<br />

developed a capability of this sort at Sary Shagan <strong>in</strong> Kazakhstan <strong>in</strong> the<br />

1980s, and furtive press reports <strong>in</strong>dicate that Ch<strong>in</strong>a may have tested a<br />

directed energy system to illum<strong>in</strong>ate, temporarily bl<strong>in</strong>d or otherwise affect<br />

the operations of satellites <strong>in</strong> the fall of 2006.<br />

Totall<strong>in</strong>g up all that activity, we fi nd (depend<strong>in</strong>g upon how one counts the<br />

ambiguous reports) fewer than 60 genu<strong>in</strong>e tests <strong>in</strong> outer space, conducted<br />

by only three states, with only about a half dozen of those <strong>in</strong>cidents<br />

occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the past 25 years.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!