07.01.2013 Views

Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship - autonomous ...

Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship - autonomous ...

Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship - autonomous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6<br />

Incidental People:<br />

APG <strong>and</strong> Community <strong>Art</strong>s<br />

The post- ’68 period in Britain saw <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> two attempts to<br />

rethink <strong>the</strong> artist’s role in society. The first was set in motion in 1966,<br />

<strong>and</strong> its politics were contested within years <strong>of</strong> its inception: <strong>the</strong> <strong>Art</strong>ist<br />

Placement Group (APG), founded by <strong>the</strong> artist John Latham <strong>and</strong> his<br />

<strong>the</strong>n- partner Barbara Steveni, <strong>and</strong> which continued until 1989 when it<br />

was renamed O+I. 1 The second is <strong>the</strong> community arts movement,<br />

whose emergence in <strong>the</strong> UK forms part <strong>of</strong> an international push across<br />

Europe <strong>and</strong> North America to democratise <strong>and</strong> facilitate lay creativity,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to increase accessibility to <strong>the</strong> arts for less privileged audiences.<br />

These developments represent two distinct poles <strong>of</strong> rethinking <strong>the</strong><br />

artist’s place in society in <strong>the</strong> late 1960s <strong>and</strong> 1970s: one in which <strong>the</strong><br />

artist undertakes a placement with a company or government body, <strong>and</strong><br />

one in which <strong>the</strong> individual artist assumes <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> facilitating creativity<br />

among ‘everyday’ people. It should be noted that <strong>the</strong> academic<br />

literature on both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se movements is scanty: <strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> publications<br />

on community arts tend to comprise reports <strong>and</strong> evaluations <strong>of</strong><br />

specific projects ra<strong>the</strong>r than a syn<strong>the</strong>sised narrative; <strong>the</strong> APG have only<br />

recently begun to be <strong>the</strong> focus <strong>of</strong> historical re- evaluation in <strong>the</strong> UK, in<br />

part due to <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> John Latham in 2006 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> deposit <strong>of</strong> APG’s<br />

archive at Tate in 2004 (at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> writing still uncatalogued), but<br />

also due to <strong>the</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> a younger generation <strong>of</strong> artists <strong>and</strong> curators<br />

who see parallels between <strong>the</strong>ir own intervention- based activities <strong>and</strong><br />

those <strong>of</strong> APG. 2<br />

I. The Formation <strong>of</strong> APG<br />

APG is usually credited as <strong>the</strong> brainchild <strong>of</strong> John Latham (1921– 2006), a<br />

mixed- media artist peripherally involved with Assemblage <strong>and</strong> Fluxus<br />

during <strong>the</strong> 1960s. 3 He began making reliefs <strong>and</strong> assemblages from 1954<br />

onwards, using <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n new technology <strong>of</strong> spray paint; he also made<br />

fi lms, actions, <strong>and</strong> participated in <strong>the</strong> Destruction in <strong>Art</strong> Symposium at <strong>the</strong><br />

163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!