07.01.2013 Views

Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship - autonomous ...

Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship - autonomous ...

Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship - autonomous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

artificial hells<br />

Irene <strong>and</strong> Christine Hohenbüchler, untitled project for ‘Sonsbeek 93’<br />

subsequent projects in two psychiatric clinics in Germany, but <strong>the</strong> sisters<br />

recall <strong>the</strong> Sonsbeek residency as particularly stressful.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> current vogue for referring to this kind <strong>of</strong> work as ‘social’ <strong>and</strong><br />

‘political’, it seems surprising that Smith was reluctant to label her show as<br />

such. 26 It is striking that Yves Aupetitallot expresses <strong>the</strong> same sentiments when<br />

interviewed by Dillemuth about ‘Project Unité’: ‘<strong>the</strong> starting point <strong>of</strong> this<br />

project was <strong>and</strong> is’, he says, ‘<strong>the</strong> relation between art <strong>and</strong> society, but society<br />

in a very large sense, it’s not only social art or public art’. 27 Later, Aupetitallot<br />

explains that, for him, <strong>the</strong> social denotes ‘national responsibility’ ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

‘specifi c social groups’, <strong>and</strong> he alludes to <strong>the</strong> Le Corbusier building as cultural<br />

patrimony. That both curators are reluctant to call <strong>the</strong>ir shows ‘social’, despite<br />

this being an important aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir curatorial agendas, indicates <strong>the</strong> degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> conservatism that was <strong>the</strong>n dominant in <strong>the</strong> art world (no better image <strong>of</strong><br />

which was <strong>the</strong> press’s hostile response to <strong>the</strong> 1993 Whitney Biennial, which<br />

opened in March that year <strong>and</strong> embraced a critical identity politics); it also<br />

points to <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> vocabulary for describing this work. Prior to <strong>the</strong> institutionalisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> participatory art in <strong>the</strong> wake <strong>of</strong> relational aes<strong>the</strong>tics <strong>the</strong>re was<br />

simply no adequate language for dealing with works <strong>of</strong> art in <strong>the</strong> social sphere<br />

that were not reducible to activism or community art. 28<br />

If Smith <strong>and</strong> Aupetitallot show a reluctance to name <strong>the</strong>ir exhibitions as<br />

shows <strong>of</strong> ‘social art’, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> community- based work being formulated in<br />

<strong>the</strong> US at this time – which was about to be framed by <strong>the</strong> artist Suzanne<br />

Lacy as ‘new genre public art’ – showed no shortage <strong>of</strong> faith in such a<br />

mission. There, an artistic project dovetailed with a social conscience, if<br />

not exactly an explicitly leftist political project. Lacy was one <strong>of</strong> eight<br />

202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!