07.01.2013 Views

Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship - autonomous ...

Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship - autonomous ...

Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship - autonomous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

artificial hells<br />

From a contemporary perspective, one <strong>of</strong> Beuys’s most salient later<br />

projects is 100 Days <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Free International University, organised for<br />

Documenta 6 (1977). Thirteen interdisciplinary workshops, open to <strong>the</strong><br />

public, featured trade unionists, lawyers, economists, politicians, journalists,<br />

community workers, educationalists <strong>and</strong> sociologists speaking<br />

alongside actors, musicians <strong>and</strong> young artists. 13 In moving beyond <strong>the</strong><br />

humanities to embrace <strong>the</strong> social sciences, Beuys prefi gures an important<br />

str<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> recent curatorial <strong>and</strong> artistic activity. 14 However, <strong>the</strong>re are important<br />

differences between Beuys <strong>and</strong> artists working today: Beuys’s<br />

commitment to free education was for <strong>the</strong> most part dependent on his own<br />

charismatic leadership, rendering unclear <strong>the</strong> line between education <strong>and</strong><br />

one- man performance; today’s artists, by contrast, are less likely to present<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves as <strong>the</strong> central pedagogic fi gure. They outsource <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong><br />

lecturing <strong>and</strong> teaching to specialists in <strong>the</strong> fi eld – in line with <strong>the</strong> broader<br />

tendency in recent performance art to delegate performance to o<strong>the</strong>r people<br />

(as discussed in <strong>the</strong> previous chapter). Very little attention has been paid in<br />

Anglophone art history to Beuys’s activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970s, despite <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y form <strong>the</strong> most central precursor <strong>of</strong> contemporary socially<br />

engaged art, intersecting artistic goals with social, political <strong>and</strong> pedagogic<br />

ambitions. Only Jan Verwoert provides a nuanced reading <strong>of</strong><br />

Beuys’s persona as a teacher in <strong>the</strong> 1970s (<strong>and</strong> it is telling that his parents<br />

were both students <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> artist). He argues that Beuys’s output should be<br />

characterised as a hyper- intensity <strong>of</strong> pedagogic <strong>and</strong> political commitment<br />

– an excess that both reinforced <strong>and</strong> undermined his institutional position.<br />

Beuys was both ‘too progressive <strong>and</strong> too provocative’: rejecting a<br />

Joseph Beuys, Free International University seminar, 1977<br />

244

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!