10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-60-<br />

Rubber Company managed to keep the discussions going for some<br />

three years. A definite agreement was reached in 1976. <strong>The</strong> total<br />

concession area was considerably reduced, the rent per acre<br />

changed, but the most important "success" of the Government was<br />

that Firestone agreed from now on to pay all taxes of general<br />

application. An agreement which was classified during the<br />

renegotiations as "anachronistic, obsolete and sometimes<br />

offensive to the national sovereignty" (46) had (partly) come to<br />

an end (see below for a discussion of the renegotiations).<br />

FISCAL ASPECTS OF FIRESTONE'S OPERATIONS (47)<br />

This section is limited to the activities and financial<br />

contribution to the Liberian Treasury of the Firestone Plantations<br />

Company, and the following discussion excludes the other Firestone<br />

Tire & Rubber Company's subsidiaries operating in Liberia, all<br />

wholly owned, in particular the Finance Corporation of America,<br />

the United States Trading Company, the United States Liberia Radio<br />

Corporation, the Bank of Monrovia, the Liberian Construction<br />

Company, the Lone Star Transport Company, as wel,l as Firestone<br />

Plantations Company's agencies for the Farrell Lines> the Elder<br />

Dempster Lines, and the Barber Steamship Lines, its participation<br />

in the Monrovia Port Management Company, and U.S.T.C.'s agency for<br />

the Ford Motor Company.<br />

As mentioned previously the problems arising out of the<br />

interpretation of the 1926 Planting Agreement, most of them of a<br />

financial nature, were many. In fact they cropped up almost<br />

immediately after the signing of the Agreement and its approval by<br />

the National Legislature. Already in 1927 there was an exchange of<br />

letters between the Government of Liberia and the Firestone Plantations<br />

Company over the dispute whether or not the latter had to<br />

pay duties on kerosene, lubricating oil, and grease (48),<br />

Firestone had paid consular fees upon all invoices of goods<br />

shipped by it into Liberia from abroad since 1926. <strong>The</strong> exemptions<br />

granted under the 1935 Supplementary Agreement to the Planting<br />

Agreement, however, were much broader than those provided for in<br />

the original contract and after an Act had been passed on March<br />

15, 1932, raising consular fees for certification of invoices from<br />

1 % to 1g$, Firestone in 1935 claimed that it was exempt from the<br />

payment of these fees under the Supplementary Agreement,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Government, on the other hand, held the position that the<br />

payment of consular fees was not a tax or other charge, but a<br />

payment for services rendered by the Liberian diplomatic mission<br />

abroad. In those days Liberian consuls received a percentage of<br />

these fees as part of their salaries, which may explain the<br />

attitude of the Government better than its official point of view.<br />

Eventually, Firestone under protest paid these consular fees and<br />

the question was not solved definitely until the acceptance of the<br />

Second Supplementary Agreement to the Planting Agreement of 1951<br />

(see above).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!