10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-21-<br />

Consequently, both tribal people and foreign traders defied the<br />

Liberian Government by constantly evading its laws. As a result<br />

means were sought to have these laws respected, to control labour<br />

exports, and to collect customs duties. Thus, in 1864 the<br />

Liberian Legislature accepted the "Ports of Entry Law" which<br />

restricted the export of labour and the trading activities of<br />

foreigners to six coastal towns: (from east to west) Harper,<br />

Greenville, Buchanan, Marshall, Monrovia, and Robertsport. All<br />

six towns were Americo-Liberian settlements. Whereas the<br />

protection of the financial and political interests of the State<br />

contributed to a large extent to the introduction of this law,<br />

the desire of leading Americo-Liberian politicians to protect<br />

their trading activities also highly motivated the enactment of<br />

this law. <strong>The</strong> Ports of Entry Law only restricted the activities<br />

of foreign traders but did not apply to Americo-Liberians who<br />

thus obtained a monopoly position. Last but not least, a widely<br />

displayed inferiority complex of leading Americo-Liberians -<br />

with respect to foreigners - cannot be omitted in the explanation<br />

of the acceptance of this law. Each of the first five Presidents<br />

of the Republic in their respective Inaugural Addresses<br />

overemphasized the theme that "(.*,) the Negro is capable of<br />

self-government (..,)" (33).<br />

As from the start of the Republic the activities of the colonists<br />

to build a new nation had been characterized by the rejection of<br />

foreign (white) participation. <strong>The</strong> clause of the Liberian<br />

Constitution which excludes white people from citizenship may<br />

serve as one of the most illustrating proofs of this view. <strong>The</strong><br />

superiority complex wiiich the colonists displayed with respect to<br />

the African tribes excluded the latter also from participation in<br />

the building up of the country. Also in this case the Constitution<br />

adopted by the settlers shows this exclusion of African tribes<br />

who were not granted citizenship of the country on whose<br />

territory they were living. Thus, it is only logical that the<br />

Americo-Liberians continuously sought the active participation<br />

from black people abroad - through emigration - in the building<br />

up of their country (34)•<br />

<strong>The</strong> origin of the "Ports of Entry Law" of 1864 goes as far back<br />

as the Colonial Period (1822 - 1847), already characterized by the<br />

protection of the interests of the wealthy Liberian traders. This<br />

was facilitated by the composition of the Colonial Council (the<br />

local representation of the American Colonization Society) in<br />

which the colonists-traders were well represented. In the<br />

election of members of the Council in 1840 most candidates were<br />

succesful traders (35). <strong>The</strong> Council mainly served the interests<br />

of the Merchant-Princes, and restricted trade by tribal people of<br />

the region and by white foreigners. This led inevitably to wars<br />

with the tribal people, e.g. in 1832 with the Dey and the Gola,<br />

and in 1835 with the Bassa, who resented these laws which<br />

restricted their trading activities and deprived them of a<br />

considerable amount of traditional trade with European traders.<br />

In 1839 the Council had created "Ports of Entry" to facilitate<br />

the collection of customs duties (36) .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!