10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-198-<br />

September 1, 1977 the Government could still not determine its<br />

position, and despite the negative advice given by the Government<br />

employed auditing firm of Whinney Murray Ernst & Ernst concerning<br />

an unchanged continuation of the relationship with M.M.A.L.<br />

(111 ), the Government decided to extend the existing management<br />

agreement by another year, until September 1, 1979, and to extend<br />

the notice period accordingly to August 31, 1978. This, of course,<br />

could not solve the problem with respect to N.I.O.C.'s<br />

(expensive) mismanagement but highlighted a general<br />

characteristic of the Tolbert Administration, i.e. the<br />

postponement of decisions on delicate and major issues (which<br />

only resulted in a continuation of the status quo). <strong>The</strong><br />

relations with the Christie Estate and its financial interests in<br />

N.I.O.C. may have played an important role here (see below).<br />

Finally in 1978 the management agreement with M.M.A.L. was amended<br />

(pending negotiations for its termination). <strong>The</strong> contract period<br />

was again extended to August 31, 1983 with a subsequent renewal<br />

for an additional five year period unless written notice<br />

of termination was given at least one year prior to the expiration<br />

date. <strong>The</strong> management fee was reduced to 3.5? of the first<br />

25 million dollars of gross sales and 3? of the excess with a<br />

limit of one million dollar fee per contract year, effective<br />

from September 1, 1978 (112). Whether this will solve the existing<br />

problems in relation to the quality of the management services<br />

rendered is doubtful.<br />

<strong>The</strong> excessive sales commission amounting to 3.5? of sales<br />

proceeds which had been paid to Wm.H.Muller & Company (a similar<br />

arrangement as had been made between L.M.C. and the Dutch<br />

company) had been reduced in'1972. In that- year the Muller<br />

Company was replaced as N.I.O.C.'s exclusive sales agent by<br />

CAEMI International B.V. though this was caused by factors<br />

outside the Mano River Mine. <strong>The</strong> merger of Wm.H.Muller & Co.<br />

with another Dutch firm in 1972 had resulted in Mullers' making<br />

certain staff members redundant, and these then decided to form<br />

an organization of their own. Lacking the necessary capital they<br />

found a willing partner in the Brazilian company of "Companhia<br />

Auxiliar de Empresas de dinera^ao" (CAEMI) which was looking for<br />

a sales agent to take care of the marketing of its products.<br />

Subsequently, with the know-how and experience of the former<br />

Muller employees and the capital of CAEMI International S.A.<br />

(Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) a Dutch subsidiary was formed, CAEMI<br />

International B.V. (113). N.I.O.C./M.M.A.L. preferred to continue<br />

business with the (former Muller) employees who were now working<br />

with CAEMI and with effect from August 22, 1972 CAEMI International<br />

B.V. was appointed its exclusive sales agent though the<br />

agreement was not signed until January 26, 1973.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sales commission paid to CAEMI is less than what was paid to<br />

Muller, <strong>The</strong> commission payable to CAEMI consists of 2.5? of the<br />

net sales proceeds of the first 3.2 million long tons shipped,<br />

and 3% of the net sales proceeds of the tonnage shipped In excess

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!