10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-253-<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1967 concession agreement with Lee Edgar Detwiler<br />

LISCO was granted a 70-year concession which gave the company the<br />

exclusive rights to explore for iron ore, manganese, bauxite and<br />

other mineral resources in the Exploration Area, the Wologisi<br />

Mountain Range in Lofa County, during an Exploration Period of<br />

5 years, and exclusive rights with respect to iron ore, manganese<br />

and bauxite deposits in Exploitation Lots, selected from the<br />

Exploration Area, but not totalling more than 300 square miles<br />

(approximately 192,000 acres). <strong>The</strong> company obtained an option<br />

to negotiate a concession agreement with respect to other ores,<br />

metals and minerals found in the concession area (124).<br />

<strong>The</strong> concessionaire would pay a 50? corporate income tax but was<br />

allowed numerous deductions for tax purposes such as all taxes,<br />

fees etc. paid to the Government, explicitly excluding income<br />

taxes paid but explicitly including royalty payments and a<br />

depletion allowance. Thus the royalty of 15 cents per ton of<br />

ore in effect became 7s cents per ton of ore.<br />

A depletion allowance had been questioned from the beginning of<br />

the negotiations yet it was granted. This depletion allowance was<br />

a special allowance, officially intended to facilitate<br />

accelerated debt repayment by the Concessionaire. It amounted to<br />

15? of LISCO's Gross Receipts, provided the amount of the<br />

deduction did not exceed 50? of the Net Income of the year in<br />

which it would be deducted and further provided that the amount<br />

of the deduction would be applied in its entirety against<br />

indebtedness in addition to current debt repayment from<br />

depreciation and amortization allowances. <strong>The</strong> depletion allowance<br />

would not be applied in any one year to the extent that it would<br />

reduce net taxable profits below an amount equivalent to one<br />

dollar per ton of ore exported nor was the depletion allowance<br />

or any part thereof which had not been deducted in any one year<br />

to be deducted in any of the following years. As soon as LISCO's<br />

indebtedness would be liquidated the depletion allowance would<br />

cease to be deducted (125),<br />

<strong>The</strong> concession agreement did not provide for a maximum debtequity<br />

ratio but instead included a rather loose and vaguely<br />

formulated obligation "to guarantee the continuing solvency of<br />

the Company and to protect the legitimate interests of the<br />

Government, the lenders as well as the shareholders;" (126).<br />

Although only interest payments and not the repayment of the<br />

principal were to be deducted from Gross Income (unlike the<br />

arrangements made with LAMCO and DELIMCO) the deduction of a<br />

depletion allowance in the case of LISCO in effect served the<br />

same purpose and - if put into practice - would erode the<br />

Government revenue in the same way as it had already done in<br />

the case of the LAMCO J.V. and DELIMCO. In view of the<br />

experience gained in the gigantic debt-servicing of these two<br />

companies the Government should have known better.<br />

Another disputed issue which the Government had lost was the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!