10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 11<br />

Introduction<br />

-360-<br />

THE TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY AND<br />

THE TRAINING AND EDUCATION OF MANPOWER 1900 - 1979<br />

Whereas the availability of labour, of natural resources<br />

including land and water, and of capital constitute an economy's<br />

productive capacity, the key to a full and rational utilization<br />

of these assets is provided by a well-trained (and healthy)<br />

labour force, the existence of infrastructural facilities such as<br />

transportation networks and communication systems, and<br />

efficiently operating government institutions which supervise or<br />

in some cases control these (productive) activities.<br />

<strong>The</strong> decision to make more and better use of the country's<br />

potential was taken in the case of Liberia at a stage when<br />

neither manpower, nor infrastructure and (government)<br />

institutions were developed (see Chapter 2). This partly explains<br />

the historical decision to make use of foreigners through the<br />

introduction of an Economic <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong> Policy. Another reason for<br />

the introduction of an <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong> Policy was the necessity felt to<br />

safeguard the country's territorial integrity and political<br />

souvereignty. However, the invitation to and the installation of<br />

foreign investors, notably the first major one (Firestone),<br />

eventually greatly endangered the nation's political souvereignty<br />

(see Chapter 3 and 10). This was partly caused by the country's<br />

underdevelopment and weaknesses, partly by the socio-political<br />

structure of the country's leading and dominant elite, the<br />

Americo-Liberians, and partly by the nature of this foreign<br />

investment which made some kind of political control over the<br />

host Government imperative (see Chapter 3).<br />

It almost goes without saying that an invitation to foreign<br />

investors to fill a gap in a (developing) country can only be<br />

explained or justified when at the same time long-term<br />

objectives are formulated by the host country to develop its<br />

manpower and to create and develop the necessary infrastructure<br />

and institutions whose absence or underdevelopment inhibited the<br />

exploitation and the use of the country's productive capacity by<br />

its nationals.<br />

None of the Administrations which Liberia has had since the<br />

concept of an Economic <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong> Policy was introduced ever<br />

presented a coherent over-all Development Plan which aimed at<br />

making the presence of foreign investors redundant (see Chapter<br />

10). This again is to a great extent explained by the sociopolitical<br />

structure of the country's elite which would have<br />

imperiled its dominant position by making the country<br />

independent of foreigners (1).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!