10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-358-<br />

modest (averaging less than 5 per cent of the total). <strong>The</strong><br />

military assistance was largely made up of grants consisting of<br />

technical and financial assistance in the mapping of Liberia.<br />

Credit sales of military equipment accounted for the major part<br />

of the loans granted under the military assistance programme<br />

(87). Total U.S. assistance in the years 1962- through 1977<br />

amounted to $ 308.8 million. This is equivalent to nearly 84$<br />

per cent of the direct revenues originating from the <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong><br />

Policy in the 1963 - 1977 period (see Table 37). In the 1946 -<br />

19 77 period direct payments by the companies operating in<br />

Liberia under the <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong> Policy had in all amounted to<br />

$ 475-6 million, whereas U.S. assistance to the Liberian<br />

Government in this period totalled $ 395-6 million or 83 per<br />

cent.<br />

Complete and reliable statistics on public foreign assistance<br />

to Liberia in the 1964 - 1977 period are not available. <strong>The</strong><br />

main cause for this is the lack of continuity in reporting<br />

periods, combined with the inconsistency of available data.<br />

However, the data from Annex 25 justify the conclusion that the<br />

total flow of foreign funds to Liberia exceeded the total direct<br />

income from the concession sector (including Maritime Revenues)<br />

in the 1963 - 1977 period.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Three important conclusions may be drawn from the foregoing.<br />

First, the total flow of foreign funds to Liberia exceeded the<br />

total direct income from the concession sector (including<br />

Maritime Revenues) - which already formed nearly one third of<br />

Total Domestic Revenues (see Table 37)- Ths Liberian Government<br />

has thus shown its extreme dependency on foreign funds to<br />

maintain its present level of expenditures, i.e. to continue<br />

the services (limited and of poor quality as they may be)<br />

actually provided to the country's population and to finance<br />

the improvement of the productive capacity of the economy. To<br />

give concrete form to this conclusion it may be stated that<br />

without foreign funds the economy will collapse and tens of<br />

thousands of civil servants and other workers will become<br />

unemployed. This will become a reality without the willingness<br />

of foreign investors to (continue to) invest in the exploitation<br />

of Liberia's natural resources or without the continued flow of<br />

foreign capital (from public, multilateral and private sources).<br />

It goes without saying that the foreign investors' attitude is<br />

to a large extent determined by the willingness of the<br />

Government of Liberia to provide attractive incentives to foreigi<br />

investments.<br />

Secondly, the Liberian Government has shown itself to be unable<br />

to introduce and implement a clear fiscal policy or even<br />

development policy, apart from its general adherence to the<br />

principles of the (much referred to) <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong> Policy. <strong>The</strong><br />

Government's fiscal practices in the 1926 - 1978 period do not<br />

justify the qualification of "policy". Everything seems to have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!