10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-225-<br />

of the revision of the 1960 Mining Concession Agreement, in<br />

1973/74 the Liberian Government could not share in the dividend<br />

paid on this Preferred Stock after 1974, some $ 668,000.00 per<br />

year, as it did in the case of the Swedish investors. A 25? tax<br />

on these dividends was therefore imposed with the 1974 Amendatory<br />

Agreement to the Mining Concession Agreement (51). L.1.0.'s<br />

approval of this arrangement is explained by external factors.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Canadian-registered holding company had always been exempted<br />

from Canadian taxes but in keeping with internal tax legislation<br />

in Canada in the early 197O's the company had become taxable in<br />

Canada on the interest received from LAMCO, as the Swedish LAMCO<br />

Syndicate always had been in Sweden. As under the new legislation<br />

in Canada the dividends which it was to receive on Preferred<br />

Stock would still be exempted from taxes L.1.0. easily agreed<br />

upon the conversion of its debentures into Preferred Stock and a<br />

25? Liberian tax on the dividends payable on this Preferred<br />

Stock (52). In 1974 negotiations started for a Canadian-Liberian<br />

Double Taxation Treaty in view of the shortly expected general<br />

tax liability of L.1.0. in Canada. Although it is clear that the<br />

Swedish LAMCO Syndicate and L.1.0. had not been inspired by<br />

altruistic motives, the Liberian Treasury through these fiscal<br />

arrangement yearly (1974-1977) gained an amount of nearly $ 1<br />

million.<br />

<strong>The</strong> costs of financing the mining venture with borrowed funds<br />

were not limited to the foregoing. As a result of LAMCO's<br />

excessive reliance on non-equity capital the Company's major<br />

lenders had made their loans conditional upon the provision that<br />

over a number of years LAMCO would set aside about 50? of its<br />

yearly profits as a capital reserve. As early as 1964, however,<br />

it was openly acknowledged that such a practice would hamper the<br />

yearly payments of dividends and on January 1, 1965 an agreement<br />

was concluded under which the Swedish LAMCO Syndicate guaranteed<br />

the Company's debt to certain non-affiliated companies against a<br />

yearly fee of $ 300,000.00 (payable on a quarterly basis).<br />

L.1.0. was to pay this fee but it would be reimbursed 50? of the<br />

amount by LAMCO. Under the 50? profit-sharing arrangement in<br />

LAMCO the Liberian Government thus contributed indirectly to<br />

this paid guarantee, viz., $ 75,000.00 a year. <strong>The</strong> agreement of<br />

January 1, 1965 will expire on December 31, 1980 (53).<br />

Royalty payments (54)<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1974 Amendment of the 1960 Mining Concession Agreement also<br />

introduced the payment of a royalty. It was agreed that the<br />

insertion of a minimum royalty provision would assure the<br />

Government of a minimum revenue each year, regardless of the<br />

profit level of the Company. Royalty payments were determined at<br />

4? of LAMCO's net sales of iron ore and iron ore products during<br />

each quarter. However, as a result of the Government's 50?<br />

ownership of LAMCO the effective royalty payments amounted to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!