10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-364-<br />

same foreign investor, the Firestone Plantations Company, also<br />

for a long time refused to accede to the demand to sell part of<br />

its production to the Government, before finally giving in in<br />

1976 (see Chapter 3). <strong>The</strong> inability of the Liberian Government<br />

to attract investors who were willing to establish a steel<br />

factory - or the failure to set up a steel factory itself - is<br />

also significant in this respect. <strong>The</strong> same applies to the<br />

logging companies which in practice could not be forced to set<br />

up wood processing industries as was stipulated in their<br />

concession agreements.<br />

<strong>The</strong> companies' participation in the financing and realization of<br />

a national educational programme or of a programme designed to<br />

train manpower who (1) would meet the manpower needs of these<br />

companies, and (2) would improve Liberia's capacity to exploit<br />

its natural resources without these foreign investors, or with a<br />

reduced number of them - though this would, of course, clash<br />

with these companies' interests - was either non-existent or<br />

symbolic. This even applies to the LAMCO J.V. and the Bong<br />

Mining Company despite their previously mentioned remarkable<br />

efforts in this field. <strong>The</strong> Firestone Plantations Company as well<br />

as the other plantation companies still employ a vital number of<br />

expatriates to perform the technical tasks necessary to continue<br />

the companies' operations. To describe the relations with<br />

foreign investors as "Partnership and Progress" is therefore, to<br />

say the least, misleading. In the case of Firestone, for example,<br />

the most important phenomenon approaching a reasonable concept<br />

of partnership consisted of the rubber company's free<br />

distribution of clones, the free advice given to Liberian rubber<br />

farmers, and the buying of their product (rubber) - from which<br />

primarily the political elite has benefited (see Chapter 13).<br />

Likewise, "progress" as a characteristic of the Firestone -<br />

Liberia relations refers to the company,'s advancement rather then<br />

to an increasing exploitation of the country's potential to the<br />

benefit of its inhabitants. <strong>The</strong> Liberian Minister of Finance,<br />

Stephen A. Tolbert (1972 - 1975), himself an important rubber<br />

plantation owner, defended his own and Firestone's interests when<br />

in. 1975 during a meeting with educational experts of the World<br />

Bank who insisted that Liberia whould accelerate its educational<br />

efforts he said:<br />

"(..,) but then - who is going to tap our rubber trees?" (5).<br />

Yet there are more striking examples of the attitude and the<br />

interests of the foreign investors - and the concept of their<br />

role as shown by the Liberian political elite. As a consequence<br />

of the absence of any Government policy with respect to<br />

education and training of manpower, and given the efforts<br />

undertaken by the mining companies there was, for instance, only<br />

one mining engineer working at the Ministry of Lands and Mines,<br />

Carney Johnson in 1977 (6). In this year the country's first<br />

major mining company closed its gates after operating for almost<br />

one third of a century in the country. Also at the end of the<br />

197O's it was still not possible to study mining at a university<br />

level in Liberia. Consequently, the foreign companies skillfully

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!