11.01.2013 Views

Culture and Privilege in Capitalist Asia - Jurusan Antropologi ...

Culture and Privilege in Capitalist Asia - Jurusan Antropologi ...

Culture and Privilege in Capitalist Asia - Jurusan Antropologi ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

102 FROM ORANG KAYA BARU TO MELAYU BARA<br />

bureaucrats), recently labeled, together with Malay corporate players, as Melayu<br />

Baru. The ‘new’ middle class is based ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> big cities, such as Kuala Lumpur,<br />

Penang, Johare Baru, Kuch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Kita K<strong>in</strong>abalu. But the ‘old’ middle class is<br />

based both <strong>in</strong> the big cities <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the small rural towns <strong>and</strong> villages.<br />

There is a noticeable difference between these two categories of middle class, at<br />

least <strong>in</strong> the Malay case <strong>in</strong> Malaysia. Those <strong>in</strong> the old, manually-oriented middleclass,<br />

most of whom are rural-based, seem to be dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the ‘rentier’ k<strong>in</strong>d,<br />

compris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have little or no previous background <strong>in</strong> the world of<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess. In fact, most of them are children of Malay peasants. They, or their<br />

family members, are not seriously <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess either, except as ‘sleep<strong>in</strong>g<br />

partners’ to Ch<strong>in</strong>ese towkays, or tycoons, earn<strong>in</strong>g large sums of money <strong>in</strong><br />

commissions for gett<strong>in</strong>g government contracts us<strong>in</strong>g their political positions or<br />

contacts. They are between 45 <strong>and</strong> 50 years of age, with secondary-school<br />

qualifications, but their ma<strong>in</strong> asset is that, over the years, they have built an<br />

enormous political power base at the grassroots by virtue of work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mostly <strong>in</strong> the rural areas. They became rich <strong>and</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>ed the middle class through<br />

the ‘bus<strong>in</strong>ess of development projects’ for the rural poor (Papenoe 1970; Mohd.<br />

Fauzi Yaacob 1981).<br />

I call these new rich Malay ‘rentier’ middle-class politicians whose position is<br />

ak<strong>in</strong> to telor dihujung t<strong>and</strong>ok (lit. an egg perched precariously on a sharp horn),<br />

<strong>and</strong> whose success or survival is largely dependent on personal resources <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>itiative as political entrepreneurs <strong>and</strong> middlemen. Their rise <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

existence as ‘middlemen middle-class’ Malays, who are not really highly educated<br />

but who are extremely <strong>in</strong>fluential <strong>and</strong> powerful at the grassroots, rest heavily on<br />

‘patronage politics’, which now takes the form of ‘money politics’ with<strong>in</strong> UMNO<br />

(Gomez 1990). They seemed to be UMNO’s ma<strong>in</strong> source of support <strong>and</strong> strength<br />

<strong>and</strong>, at the same time, its weakness, because they can literally be bought <strong>and</strong> sold.<br />

This is evident <strong>in</strong> the period s<strong>in</strong>ce the advent of the NEP, when UMNO has<br />

struggled <strong>and</strong> staggered from one leadership crisis to another <strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong>deed, was<br />

‘brought back from the dead’ after be<strong>in</strong>g deregistered <strong>in</strong> 1988 (Shamsul 1988).<br />

Although the majority <strong>in</strong> the new middle class were once kampung, or village,<br />

kids, now they are based <strong>in</strong> urban areas where most of them are employed. That<br />

they are what they are <strong>and</strong> where they are now is directly related to the<br />

implementation of the NEP’s second objective of ‘restructur<strong>in</strong>g society’, particularly<br />

<strong>in</strong> the field of education. S<strong>in</strong>ce the advent of the NEP, the government has created<br />

a number of special education-related programmes, which I call ‘express lane<br />

programmess’–fully funded by the government–to <strong>in</strong>crease the number of<br />

qualified Malays rapidly, not only <strong>in</strong> the field of science <strong>and</strong> technology but also <strong>in</strong><br />

non-science fields (Siti Zaharah Sulaiman 1975). With<strong>in</strong> a period of ten years<br />

(1976—85), thous<strong>and</strong>s of graduates from these special programmes flooded the<br />

Malaysian job market, some hav<strong>in</strong>g graduated from local tertiary <strong>in</strong>stitutions, <strong>and</strong><br />

others from <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> the USA, Australia <strong>and</strong> the UK. S<strong>in</strong>ce 1988, after<br />

overcom<strong>in</strong>g early unemployment woes, the government has managed to create<br />

employment for these ‘NEP graduates’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!