16.01.2013 Views

1EQQ8ZzGD

1EQQ8ZzGD

1EQQ8ZzGD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. can curiosity Be localiZed to one Brain region?<br />

no, it cannot. Here's how I know: I've personally worked with<br />

people who have a severely damaged striatum. Know what?<br />

They still have curiostiy. If the striatum is where curiosity is<br />

in the brain, how can someone whose striata are gone still<br />

have curiosty? They cannot. Yet they do. Poof. Hypothesis disproved.<br />

Imagine asking, "Where is video located in my computer?"<br />

That doesn't make any sense. Your monitor is required to see<br />

the video. Your graphics card is required to render the video.<br />

The software is required to generate the code for the video.<br />

But the "video" isn't located anywhere in the computer.<br />

now there's a subtlety here. It may be that people with<br />

damaged striata have curiosity impairments (whatever that<br />

means), which would agree with the fMRI study discussed in<br />

that link above, but it proves that the striatum is not where<br />

curiosity is in the brain. More technically: the striatum may<br />

be a critical part of a network of brain regions that support<br />

curiosity behaviors, but that is different from saying that the<br />

striatum is where curiosity is.<br />

or, as I say in my chapter:<br />

The cognitive subtraction method . . . provide[s] details of<br />

functional localization that can then be tested and corroborated<br />

using other methodologies, including lesion studies. The interpretation<br />

of these localization results is confounded, however, by<br />

a lack of clarity in what is meant for a "function" to be localized.<br />

For example, Young and colleagues (2000) noted that for a<br />

given function to be localizable, that function "must be capable<br />

of being considered both structurally and functionally discrete;"<br />

a property that the brain is incapable of assuming due to the<br />

intricate, large-scale neuronal interconnectivity.<br />

Thus, discussing behavioral functions outside of the context of<br />

the larger cortical and subcortical networks involved with that<br />

function is a poorly posed problem. Therefore, the scientific<br />

study of cognition requires detailed neuroanatomical and connectivity<br />

information to compliment functional activity findings.<br />

Anyway, this prompted me to write a whole blog post with<br />

link to papers, etc. about this topic: http://blog.ketyov.<br />

221

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!