Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Proposition Two that- where consumers access their personal savings to pay f<strong>or</strong> transactions,<br />
the mode <strong>of</strong> payment selected will affect their purchase behaviour. Three <strong>of</strong> the ancillary<br />
propositions – that the amount spent and the number <strong>of</strong> items purchased is less when the cash<br />
mode is used and that debit card users are m<strong>or</strong>e likely to buy manufacturers labels are<br />
supp<strong>or</strong>ted. Less difference is noted when comparisons are across the type <strong>of</strong> product<br />
purchased- in this instance food/ non food items. The variation lies with the purchase <strong>of</strong><br />
personal products and kitchen items with the debit card user buying m<strong>or</strong>e in terms <strong>of</strong> value.<br />
The comparisons across the various payment modes selected in the control group shows that<br />
cash users spend less than both debit and credit card users and debit card users spend less<br />
than credit card users. However it needs to be remembered that the control group sample size<br />
is too low f<strong>or</strong> any definitive conclusions.<br />
There is some supp<strong>or</strong>t f<strong>or</strong> proposition three- that there is a link between the cognitive and<br />
emotional associations that people have with specific payment modes and their payment<br />
mode choice? When the fact<strong>or</strong> means are compared only four show significant variation- the<br />
two emotion fact<strong>or</strong>s, gratification and money as gift. Relating to the emotion fact<strong>or</strong> those<br />
who prefer debit card consider that the debit card allows them to feel m<strong>or</strong>e relaxed confident,<br />
secure and affluent than does cash and they find using the card pleasurable. Those who<br />
prefer the cash mode associate cash with feeling relaxed confident, secure and affluent and<br />
find using cash pleasurable. Though the gift mode fact<strong>or</strong> showed a difference, the basis <strong>of</strong><br />
this difference is how a gift <strong>of</strong> $100 to a debit account should be spent. The cash group would<br />
spend it on something special whereas the debit group think it would probably be used f<strong>or</strong><br />
non-specific purposes. Both groups perceive that debit card use impairs their ability to<br />
manage their money and that the use <strong>of</strong> cash helps to reduce spending. Both groups agree<br />
that when they have cash in their wallet- it is money to be spent.<br />
One observation that can be made is that people who prefer to use cash- associate it with a<br />
pleasurable activity so that the assumption that the use <strong>of</strong> cash translates to an experienced<br />
psychological pain may need to be reassessed. Though Zellermayer’s w<strong>or</strong>k is influential, in<br />
that he introduced the notion <strong>of</strong> psychological pain, the focus <strong>of</strong> his study was on bill<br />
payments in relation to time <strong>of</strong> payment and the source (products purchased). In this context<br />
he observed that ‘choosing how to pay may be m<strong>or</strong>e a function <strong>of</strong> habit than by immediate<br />
hedonic considerations’. He does not clarify what is meant by hedonic but implies that when<br />
132