17.01.2013 Views

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and effect fact<strong>or</strong>s not linked to the same test samples and test reliability issues. Thomas et al.<br />

(2011) is an example <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> these issues. F<strong>or</strong> example Thomas et al. (2011) use<br />

convenience samples and different population sets f<strong>or</strong> their judgement group (identifying un-<br />

healthy products and potential impulse purchase behaviour) and their test groups. They also<br />

use mixed instrumentation and non-specification <strong>of</strong> cause–effect relationships. Participant<br />

characteristics (other than spendthrift/tightwad distinctions) are not gathered. Unrealistic<br />

scenarios - in Study Two students were told they are participating in a task designed to help a<br />

new supermarket st<strong>or</strong>e make merchandise decisions and were asked to shop in the online<br />

st<strong>or</strong>e - but on screen they were only allowed to choose from a set number <strong>of</strong> products in the<br />

healthy and the twenty unhealthy food categ<strong>or</strong>ies. The use <strong>of</strong> smiley faces to identify pain is<br />

not an inherent issue - although reliability and validity aspects are not rep<strong>or</strong>ted. Since the<br />

smiley face in essence measures happy-sad – it is not a ‘pain’ scale per se. Nevertheless the<br />

auth<strong>or</strong>s are at least trying to capture some emotional response. The problem lies with the item<br />

selection and validation <strong>of</strong> the w<strong>or</strong>d response test where respondents were ask to check<br />

whether they felt Irritated, Restricted, Powerless, Annoyed, Controlled, Suffocated, Inhibited<br />

<strong>or</strong> ‘none <strong>of</strong> these. No validity tests are rep<strong>or</strong>ted, the w<strong>or</strong>ds are biased toward negative<br />

associations and no associated tests between face scale and w<strong>or</strong>d scale are rep<strong>or</strong>ted.<br />

2.6: <strong>Payment</strong> Mode effects on Purchase Behaviour: Explanat<strong>or</strong>y The<strong>or</strong>ies<br />

Researchers have primarily used four the<strong>or</strong>ies to explain why the payment mode affects<br />

purchase behaviour: Mental Accounting (prospective & retrospective), Pain <strong>of</strong> Paying and<br />

Transparency. Though these are <strong>of</strong>fered as distinct the<strong>or</strong>ies, they are related and may have a<br />

common explanat<strong>or</strong>y base.<br />

2.6.1: Mental Accounting and <strong>Payment</strong> Coupling<br />

The earliest explanation is mental accounting, described by Thaler (1980) as a “set <strong>of</strong><br />

cognitive operations used by individuals and households to <strong>or</strong>ganise, evaluate and keep track<br />

<strong>of</strong> financial activities” (p.40). At the transaction level, people are said to tend to “open” an<br />

account mentally f<strong>or</strong> each transaction and base their decision on evaluation <strong>of</strong> the perceived<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!