17.01.2013 Views

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A number <strong>of</strong> explanations f<strong>or</strong> how payment mode affects purchase behaviour are <strong>of</strong>fered,<br />

however they are all linked to one - transparency. M<strong>or</strong>e specifically, that the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

transparency has a decoupling effect and this decoupling impairs our mental accounting<br />

ability, reduces awareness <strong>of</strong> the cost and so reduces the ‘pain’ associated with paying.<br />

Whilst transparency may well be a central fact<strong>or</strong>, why it is a central fact<strong>or</strong> is not explained.<br />

Underpinning the notion <strong>of</strong> transparency, is the idea that electronic systems (and cheque<br />

based payment - but to a lesser degree) lack transparency because they are not cash. Soman<br />

(2003:174) writes “Consider payment by cash as the benchmark transaction. In paying by<br />

cash, the payment is very salient in both physical f<strong>or</strong>m (i.e., it is easy to see that money is<br />

being spent) and in amount (i.e., since cash has to be counted and given, the amount is<br />

relatively mem<strong>or</strong>able”. The implication is that how we relate to cash based and card based<br />

tokens is different and this difference affects our perceptions and thus judgements. This<br />

means that we need to consider the physicality <strong>of</strong> the tokens as an influencing fact<strong>or</strong>.<br />

That the physicality <strong>of</strong> money influences our perceptions and judgment is evident in the<br />

‘Coin’ studies <strong>of</strong> the 1940s and 50s’. These are studies that investigate value and perceptions<br />

and are bedded in the accentuation hypothesis (in relation to coins this the<strong>or</strong>y suggests that<br />

the stated value <strong>of</strong> a coin is related to the size). F<strong>or</strong> example if a child is told to select a coin<br />

that is w<strong>or</strong>th 10c and one that is w<strong>or</strong>th $1 and the value is not noted on the test coins, the<br />

child will identify the larger coin as having a $1 value (Bruner and Goodman, 1947). In their<br />

comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> these studies, Saugstad and Schioldb<strong>or</strong>g (1966) conclude that the<br />

studies provide evidence that children and adults tend to view valued objects as larger, with<br />

children viewing large objects as m<strong>or</strong>e valuable than small objects. Similar w<strong>or</strong>k by Lea<br />

(1981) found that pre-decimal British coins were remembered as larger than the identical<br />

coins under their decimal f<strong>or</strong>m. Physicality effects are also evident in the denomination effect<br />

research. This research shows that behaviour related to the spending <strong>of</strong> a single large<br />

denomination compared to small (e.g., $5 to $100 bills) is different. One reason is that people<br />

like to conserve their money in large notes so as to curb spending as there is a reluctance to<br />

spend large denomination bills (Mishra, Mishra and Nayakankuppam, 2006; Raghubir and<br />

Srivastava, 2009). Apart from the value-size fact<strong>or</strong> in perception research, a study by<br />

Burgoyne, Routh and Ellis (1999) found that people develop emotional links to their national<br />

currency. Their study examined attitudes towards transition from a national currency to the<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!