17.01.2013 Views

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

problem using a qualitative <strong>or</strong> quantitative approach alone (Johnson and Onwuegbuzie, 2004;<br />

Bahl and Milne, 2006; Bryman and Bell, 2007; Creswell and Clark, 2007).<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> a mixed (multi) method approach <strong>or</strong> as it is <strong>of</strong>ten labelled method triangulation<br />

can be traced to Campbell and Fiske (1959), Denzin (1978) and Jick (1979). Two imp<strong>or</strong>tant<br />

notions underpin the mixed-method approach. One is that the research design should be<br />

driven by the philosophical assumptions underlying the purpose <strong>of</strong> the study and the<br />

questions that it seeks to answer (Johnson and Onwuegbuzie, 2004). Patton (2002) asserts<br />

that the need to gather the most relevant inf<strong>or</strong>mation is paramount and outweighs concerns<br />

about maintaining methodological purity. The main advantages <strong>of</strong> this approach are an<br />

increased confidence in the findings and enhanced interpretation and explanation. Mixed<br />

methods employ both inductive and deductive logic (Bahl and Milne, 2006; Creswell and<br />

Clark, Gutman and Hanson, 2003; Patton, 2002). That is, the researcher is open to what<br />

emerges from previous studies, and also to what may be a new discovery. A study may, f<strong>or</strong><br />

example, reveal certain patterns, an inductive approach; the verification <strong>of</strong> these patterns may<br />

involve a deductive approach.<br />

The study adopts Blumer’s (1978) view that social behaviour researchers should adopt a<br />

m<strong>or</strong>e naturalistic mode <strong>of</strong> enquiry based on qualitative study and inspection. This mode<br />

requires the researcher to f<strong>or</strong>m a close contact with the field <strong>of</strong> study whilst ensuring that<br />

strict controls are in place to ensure maximum control <strong>of</strong> confounding fact<strong>or</strong>s. The advantage<br />

<strong>of</strong> a field based study is that it produces behavioural data and allows a close relationship<br />

between data collection, the<strong>or</strong>y construction and analysis; it is particularly suitable f<strong>or</strong> areas<br />

where the<strong>or</strong>y is sparse <strong>or</strong> highly abstract (Hayes, 2000). Field based studies have high<br />

ecological validity as the research and behaviour are less likely to be affected by the research<br />

setting, compared to an experiment conducted in a lab<strong>or</strong>at<strong>or</strong>y (Keppel, 1982).<br />

However non- experimental field studies do have reliability and validity issues and, while it<br />

is not feasible to create a pristine research context, data quality and analysis accuracy will be<br />

managed by the use <strong>of</strong> multiple observers, coders and member checks in the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />

qualitative data collection and analysis. Scale development and testing will be via a test-<br />

retest procedure (Netemeyer, Bearden and Sharma, 2003). Validity issues are examined via<br />

EFA and CFA analysis (Gerbing and Anderson, 1988). Although all care is taken to provide<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!