Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
problem using a qualitative <strong>or</strong> quantitative approach alone (Johnson and Onwuegbuzie, 2004;<br />
Bahl and Milne, 2006; Bryman and Bell, 2007; Creswell and Clark, 2007).<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> a mixed (multi) method approach <strong>or</strong> as it is <strong>of</strong>ten labelled method triangulation<br />
can be traced to Campbell and Fiske (1959), Denzin (1978) and Jick (1979). Two imp<strong>or</strong>tant<br />
notions underpin the mixed-method approach. One is that the research design should be<br />
driven by the philosophical assumptions underlying the purpose <strong>of</strong> the study and the<br />
questions that it seeks to answer (Johnson and Onwuegbuzie, 2004). Patton (2002) asserts<br />
that the need to gather the most relevant inf<strong>or</strong>mation is paramount and outweighs concerns<br />
about maintaining methodological purity. The main advantages <strong>of</strong> this approach are an<br />
increased confidence in the findings and enhanced interpretation and explanation. Mixed<br />
methods employ both inductive and deductive logic (Bahl and Milne, 2006; Creswell and<br />
Clark, Gutman and Hanson, 2003; Patton, 2002). That is, the researcher is open to what<br />
emerges from previous studies, and also to what may be a new discovery. A study may, f<strong>or</strong><br />
example, reveal certain patterns, an inductive approach; the verification <strong>of</strong> these patterns may<br />
involve a deductive approach.<br />
The study adopts Blumer’s (1978) view that social behaviour researchers should adopt a<br />
m<strong>or</strong>e naturalistic mode <strong>of</strong> enquiry based on qualitative study and inspection. This mode<br />
requires the researcher to f<strong>or</strong>m a close contact with the field <strong>of</strong> study whilst ensuring that<br />
strict controls are in place to ensure maximum control <strong>of</strong> confounding fact<strong>or</strong>s. The advantage<br />
<strong>of</strong> a field based study is that it produces behavioural data and allows a close relationship<br />
between data collection, the<strong>or</strong>y construction and analysis; it is particularly suitable f<strong>or</strong> areas<br />
where the<strong>or</strong>y is sparse <strong>or</strong> highly abstract (Hayes, 2000). Field based studies have high<br />
ecological validity as the research and behaviour are less likely to be affected by the research<br />
setting, compared to an experiment conducted in a lab<strong>or</strong>at<strong>or</strong>y (Keppel, 1982).<br />
However non- experimental field studies do have reliability and validity issues and, while it<br />
is not feasible to create a pristine research context, data quality and analysis accuracy will be<br />
managed by the use <strong>of</strong> multiple observers, coders and member checks in the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />
qualitative data collection and analysis. Scale development and testing will be via a test-<br />
retest procedure (Netemeyer, Bearden and Sharma, 2003). Validity issues are examined via<br />
EFA and CFA analysis (Gerbing and Anderson, 1988). Although all care is taken to provide<br />
43