17.01.2013 Views

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Adam Smith proposed that money is simply a measure <strong>of</strong> ‘wealth <strong>of</strong> a nation’ and wealth is<br />

associated with value. The concern with value has since dominated classical economic<br />

thought. Classical economists proposed that money is just a measurement <strong>of</strong> value, medium<br />

<strong>of</strong> exchange, a measure <strong>of</strong> account, and a means <strong>of</strong> st<strong>or</strong>ing value (Keynes, 1930; Grierson,<br />

1977; Furnham and Lewis, 1986; Hicks, 1989; and Hoover, 1996). In classical economics,<br />

money is viewed as an essentially tangible entity that could be st<strong>or</strong>ed and circulated reflecting<br />

the dominance <strong>of</strong> the commodity the<strong>or</strong>y <strong>of</strong> money (Ingham, 2004).<br />

(Mills 1871, 1848) recognised the need to understand money at the individual level and<br />

proposed that economics was the science that dealt with only one <strong>of</strong> many human motives,<br />

the desire to maximise wealth. He proposed that several interrelated notions characterised<br />

classical economic thought:<br />

174<br />

� that money is a tangible entity; that the value is determined by the value <strong>of</strong> precious<br />

metals it contained,<br />

� that the value was determined by the supply and demand <strong>of</strong> the material constituting<br />

the entity and cost <strong>of</strong> production,<br />

� that the variation in the quantity <strong>of</strong> money causes price movement, and not vice versa,<br />

� that the existence <strong>of</strong> bank liabilities in the f<strong>or</strong>m <strong>of</strong> notes and bills <strong>of</strong> exchange were<br />

acknowledged as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> money supply only if they were convertible into gold and/<strong>or</strong> silver .<br />

Karl Marx was critical <strong>of</strong> Mill’s economic assumptions and argued that Mills (and the rest <strong>of</strong><br />

classical economists) emphasised the interest <strong>of</strong> the capitalist class that it served. During the<br />

19 th and 20 th Centuries new ideas in economic thought emerged. The two dominant the<strong>or</strong>ies<br />

are the marginal utility and general equilibrium. Marginal utility the<strong>or</strong>y suggests that<br />

consumption to maximise the total utility they receive from various goods and services<br />

(Jevons, 1871; Finn, 1992). Although prominent economist have criticised aspects <strong>of</strong> this<br />

the<strong>or</strong>y and proposed extensions and modifications utility maximisation remains the<br />

fundamental pillar <strong>of</strong> economic thought (Friedman, 1953). General equilibrium the<strong>or</strong>y<br />

inc<strong>or</strong>p<strong>or</strong>ated the activities <strong>of</strong> both producers and consumers and assumes that the price <strong>of</strong><br />

goods and services is determined by the interactions <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> individuals’ maximising<br />

utility. In this view money remains the central as medium <strong>of</strong> exchange, st<strong>or</strong>e <strong>of</strong> value that can<br />

be exchanged f<strong>or</strong> other commodities.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!