17.01.2013 Views

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Questions one and two are based on the assumption that the physical characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

payment mode influence our cognitive and emotional elements, in essence these elements act<br />

as a point <strong>of</strong> reference and thus influence our behaviour. This Chapter presents the rationale<br />

f<strong>or</strong> electing to position the study within the Framing paradigm and argues f<strong>or</strong> the relevance <strong>of</strong><br />

the frame <strong>of</strong> reference/ (anch<strong>or</strong>ing) and cognitive embodiment concepts. Question Three is<br />

directed by the payment mode literature and the propositions f<strong>or</strong>med reflect current research.<br />

3.2: Background<br />

The central premise <strong>of</strong> this study is that people in societies that use tokens as mediums <strong>of</strong><br />

exchange, over time, a complex psychological relationship with such tokens and that the<br />

agreed value <strong>of</strong> the token becomes imbued in the actual token- i.e. that representative value is<br />

physically and viscerally experienced. Further that nature <strong>of</strong> this psychological relationship<br />

affects perceptions and thus judgements when paying f<strong>or</strong> transactions; perceptions that vary<br />

across the payment modes used.<br />

In modern societies, cash tokens as representations <strong>of</strong> money have acquired meanings that are<br />

time and culture specific. Individual perceptions <strong>of</strong> such tokens are influenced by such<br />

meanings and by the specific psycho-social meanings that impact the individual. Where<br />

researchers focus on money perceptions, f<strong>or</strong> the most part the focus is on money as a concept.<br />

F<strong>or</strong> example Belk and Wallend<strong>or</strong>f (1990) identify two categ<strong>or</strong>ies; The sacred and The<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ane. Many <strong>of</strong> their examples are associated with the purpose/use <strong>of</strong> ‘money’ as a value<br />

as opposed to the actual token. However that perception <strong>of</strong> money as a concept influences<br />

how such tokens are perceived is evident in their w<strong>or</strong>k and the w<strong>or</strong>k <strong>of</strong> others. F<strong>or</strong> example<br />

giving rare <strong>or</strong> commem<strong>or</strong>ative coins as a gift can transp<strong>or</strong>t the token to the sacred - to the<br />

special. Studies by Webley, Lea and P<strong>or</strong>talaska (1983) and Burgoyne and Routh (1991)<br />

rep<strong>or</strong>t that the giving <strong>of</strong> a cheque as a gift, especially to special people on a special ‘gift’ day<br />

was deemed unacceptable. Though the actual test stimulus was a cheque, results may be m<strong>or</strong>e<br />

negative f<strong>or</strong> actual coins and notes - giving a $50 note as a present- may be deemed mundane,<br />

perhaps insulting. Children however, are <strong>of</strong>ten given coins f<strong>or</strong> special occurrences - e.g. the<br />

tooth fairy <strong>or</strong> the like. They also learn to ‘save’ coins and notes and to recognize monetary<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!