Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
assumption was that those who agreed to participate shopped weekly, at a supermarket f<strong>or</strong><br />
their groceries.<br />
This was to ensure that all the receipts were f<strong>or</strong> the same week. Participants were instructed<br />
to place their shopping receipts and the completed <strong>Payment</strong> Mode Perception (PMP)<br />
questionnaire scale in the envelope provided. Envelopes were collected by the researcher<br />
during play group and parents’ meeting sessions. One hundred and ninety two participants<br />
supplied their shopping dockets and a completed PMP questionnaire (final response<br />
rate=36%). Responses and final sample sizes across the test group are as follows:<br />
<strong>Cash</strong> <strong>Payment</strong> Mode: Sixty-one participants returned their purchase dockets<br />
(76% response rate). Seven cases were incomplete in that either the respondent<br />
did not provide a purchase receipt along with the questionnaire <strong>or</strong> the<br />
questionnaire was incomplete. Two cases were excluded from the analysis as<br />
the items purchased were f<strong>or</strong> re-selling and not personal consumption. These<br />
participants spent $800 and $700 in a single transaction. Fifty-two purchase<br />
receipts were retained f<strong>or</strong> analysis.<br />
Debit <strong>Card</strong> <strong>Payment</strong> Mode: Sixty-six purchase receipts and questionnaires<br />
were returned (82% response rate). Of the eighty participants assigned to this<br />
group, fourteen elected not to continue.<br />
Control Group: Sixty-five participants supplied purchase dockets and<br />
questionnaires (Response rate 81%). One participant supplied incomplete<br />
questionnaires and one supplied a shopping docket f<strong>or</strong> purchases totalling less<br />
than $20, (the purchases were f<strong>or</strong> sundry items and not representative <strong>of</strong> a<br />
weekly household shop and so were excluded from analysis). Sixty three cases<br />
were usable f<strong>or</strong> analysis.<br />
4.6.1: Data Entry and Analysis<br />
The data comprised the purchase dockets f<strong>or</strong> a household weekly supermarket purchase<br />
transaction and the participant’s responses to the PMP scale. The items on the shopping<br />
receipts were coded into product categ<strong>or</strong>ies. Product categ<strong>or</strong>ies from a maj<strong>or</strong> super market<br />
online p<strong>or</strong>tal were used to establish coding classifications. (http://www.foodtown.co.nz/).<br />
The twenty-five categ<strong>or</strong>ies identified in this site were collapsed into thirteen categ<strong>or</strong>ies - see<br />
Exhibit 4.3. Alcohol and tobacco products were excluded as only some supermarkets stock<br />
alcohol and tobacco tends to be a separate purchase. In addition to the product categ<strong>or</strong>ies and<br />
brands, the number <strong>of</strong> items per transaction and the total value <strong>of</strong> the receipt were also<br />
rec<strong>or</strong>ded. Demographic inf<strong>or</strong>mation included age, education, and ethnicity. The final data<br />
53