17.01.2013 Views

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

averse (see Fusaro, 2006; Zinman, 2004; Lee, Abdul-Rahman, & Kim, 2007).<br />

2.5.2.1: Debit <strong>Card</strong>s and Purchase Behaviour<br />

Only a handful <strong>of</strong> studies examine the relationship between debit card use at the point <strong>of</strong> sale<br />

and purchase behaviour. The survey by Jonker (2005) rep<strong>or</strong>ts that debit cards are m<strong>or</strong>e<br />

frequently used (compared to other modes) in non-food retail, petrol, supermarket purchases<br />

and public transp<strong>or</strong>t use; and that fast-food purchases are mostly paid f<strong>or</strong> by cash. Klee<br />

(2004) links card use to total spent in a single grocery purchase situation. She notes that<br />

purchases <strong>of</strong> $150 and above were paid by cheque (39%) credit card (25%), debit card (21%)<br />

and 15% by cash. This reflects the US preference f<strong>or</strong> cheque and credit card modes - but<br />

debit card use is close to the credit card use. Bounie and Francois (2009) asked participants to<br />

diarise their shopping behaviour across six shopping occurrences. The final sample size was<br />

substantial - 1447 participants across France submitted their diary rec<strong>or</strong>ds. They rep<strong>or</strong>t that<br />

demographic characteristics had no significant relationship with ownership and use but the<br />

type and size <strong>of</strong> transaction did - with cash preferred f<strong>or</strong> low cost payments and cards (both<br />

debit and credit) preferred f<strong>or</strong> high cost payments.<br />

Soman (2003) found that the use <strong>of</strong> pre-paid cards and cash in the context <strong>of</strong> dry-cleaning and<br />

photocopying services increased the use <strong>of</strong> both services. However it should be noted that pre-<br />

paid cards require the user to load money in the card bef<strong>or</strong>e they could make any purchase.<br />

Loading a card f<strong>or</strong> specific purchases (e.g., laundry, fuel, transp<strong>or</strong>tation, <strong>or</strong> photocopying)<br />

rather than general use could produce different associations to that <strong>of</strong> a debit card. Thaler,<br />

(1985; 1999) and Gourville and Soman (1998) suggest that the pseudo-sunk cost effect may<br />

come into play. F<strong>or</strong> example if a customer deposited money into an account (such as prepaid<br />

cards) that is earmarked f<strong>or</strong> a specific purpose the customer may consider it not fungible and<br />

consider it ‘spent’.<br />

Thomas, et al. (2011) in a collage <strong>of</strong> studies examined payment use across a number <strong>of</strong><br />

conditions. Their research comprises four separate studies:<br />

Study One: One thousand purchase receipts from a scanner panel were grouped<br />

based on payment mode (cash, credit and debit card) where cash registered 500 receipts; the<br />

credit card was 410 receipts and the debit card only 90. To determine the impulsive fact<strong>or</strong>,<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!