Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Cash or Card: Consumer Perceptions of Payment Modes - Scholarly ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
enefit <strong>of</strong> consumption and the associated cost. These mental accounts help reduce the<br />
cognitive load on the decision makers. Over time people develop mental filters as a sh<strong>or</strong>t cut<br />
to evaluate financial decision making. The assumption is that mental frames/filters influence<br />
the experience <strong>of</strong> paying by card and cash. A card-based payment mode decouples the<br />
payment from consumption – it removes the transparency so the sense that something <strong>of</strong><br />
value has been transferred is dulled. Although similar to Prospect the<strong>or</strong>y (proposes that<br />
people value gains and losses differently and, as such, will base decisions on perceived gains<br />
rather than perceived losses) mental accounting differs in that it can be applied to riskless<br />
situations; whereas prospect the<strong>or</strong>y applies to chance <strong>or</strong> probabilistic settings, mental<br />
accounting exists independently <strong>of</strong> attitudes concerning risk (Keeney and Raiffa, 1976).<br />
Mental accounting the<strong>or</strong>y is used in marketing literature to propose two related but<br />
conceptually different the<strong>or</strong>ies <strong>of</strong> “prospective accounting” and “retrospective accounting”<br />
that explain how payment mode influences purchase behaviour.<br />
Prelec and Loewenstein (1998) explain that when something is prepaid (and there is a delay<br />
between the payment and the consumption <strong>of</strong> the purchase) the acuteness (intensity) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
payment experience is reduced and this potentially increases the consumers’ evaluations <strong>of</strong><br />
the net benefits <strong>of</strong> the transaction. They argue that specifically, thinking about the cost <strong>of</strong><br />
payment at the time <strong>of</strong> purchase can undermine the pleasure derived from the items<br />
purchased and thinking about the benefits <strong>of</strong> a purchase can blunt the acuteness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
payment. They argue that this is a f<strong>or</strong>m <strong>of</strong> ‘decoupling’ and it is not dissimilar to that<br />
experienced when a credit card is used. This is in essence ‘prospective accounting’. At the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> the transaction payment is in the future. Their main thesis however is that this<br />
‘decoupling’ affects the degree <strong>of</strong> payment acuteness, <strong>or</strong> in their understanding, the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
pain experienced.<br />
Whilst still in the domain <strong>of</strong> mental accounting, Soman (2001) proposes retrospective the<strong>or</strong>y<br />
to explain payment mode influences on spending behaviour. The the<strong>or</strong>y involves mental<br />
accounting at the levels <strong>of</strong> the spending budget rather than at the point <strong>of</strong> purchase decision.<br />
The the<strong>or</strong>y suggests that individuals have an idea <strong>of</strong> what they spend and whether their<br />
current spending is above <strong>or</strong> below the budget; that is, the role <strong>of</strong> budgeting on spending<br />
decision is driven by retrospection <strong>of</strong> past expenses. Individuals use their mem<strong>or</strong>y <strong>of</strong> past<br />
spending as a reference point to guide their current spending. Past payment reduces purchase<br />
24