19.06.2013 Views

INTRODUCCIÓN: REVISIÓN CRITICA DEL PROBLEMA

INTRODUCCIÓN: REVISIÓN CRITICA DEL PROBLEMA

INTRODUCCIÓN: REVISIÓN CRITICA DEL PROBLEMA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RESULTADOS<br />

significant delay in calcium reuptake. As a result, duration of the polarization<br />

phase of cardiac contraction might be expected to increase, thus causing or<br />

worsening diastolic dysfunction.<br />

In the present study, sRAGE levels identified high-risk patients who were older,<br />

more frequently ischemic, with worse functional classes, more prevalent renal<br />

failure and anemia, and higher glycated hemoglobin levels. However, results of<br />

multivariable analysis adjusted for SHFS, BNP, and creatinine levels indicate that<br />

the association of sRAGE with mortality and morbidity are independent of these<br />

clinical conditions and co-morbidities, already considered in the SHFS with the<br />

exception of kidney function and glycated hemoglobin. In fact, sRAGE was the<br />

second more powerful predictor of worse outcomes after SHFS. Interestingly,<br />

renal function expressed as serum creatinine or glomerular filtration rate, which is<br />

a known prognostic predictor in patients with cardiovascular diseases, lost its<br />

significance as a risk marker when adjusted by SHFS, sRAGE, and BNP in our<br />

study. This finding repeats previous evidence from 2 population based<br />

studies 273,277 . This prognostic inferiority of serum creatinine and glomerular<br />

filtration rate can be attributed to several factors. Regarding serum creatinine, it is<br />

known that it does not reflect accurately real renal function, particularly in elderly<br />

women. Concerning glomerular filtration rate, presence of the same variables in<br />

equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rate (Modification of Diet in Renal<br />

Disease and Cockroft-Gault equations) and SHFS likely attenuates the prognostic<br />

capabilities of the former.<br />

Limitations<br />

Our study has several limitations. Although prospective, this is a small-sample<br />

study in a specific CHF population, so further larger-sample investigations are<br />

needed to confirm our results. In contrast, the proportion of high-risk patients<br />

according to SHFS was small; only 25.4% had a risk > 10%. It must be<br />

remembered that the population examined with SHFS came mainly from clinical<br />

trials of outpatients, whereas our patients with an expected worse prognosis were<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!