Fulltext - SBU
Fulltext - SBU
Fulltext - SBU
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
F. Comparison of different DIAGNOdent<br />
cut-off limits for in vivo detection of occlusal<br />
caries. Oper Dent 2003;28:672-80.<br />
78. Katz BP, Huntington E. Statistical issues<br />
for combining multiple caries diagnostics<br />
for demonstrating caries efficacy.<br />
J Dent Res 2004;83 Spec No C:C109-12.<br />
79. Longbottom C, Pitts NB. Initial<br />
comparison between endoscopic and<br />
conventional methods of caries diagnosis.<br />
Quintessence Int 1990;21:531-40.<br />
80. Lunder N, von der Fehr FR. Approximal<br />
cavitation related to bite-wing image<br />
and caries activity in adolescents. Caries<br />
Res 1996;30:143-7.<br />
81. Lussi A, Megert B, Longbottom C,<br />
Reich E, Francescut P. Clinical performance<br />
of a laser fluorescence device for<br />
detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur<br />
J Oral Sci 2001;109:14-9.<br />
82. Machiulskiene V, Nyvad B, Baelum V.<br />
A comparison of clinical and radiographic<br />
caries diagnoses in posterior teeth of 12-<br />
year-old Lithuanian children. Caries Res<br />
1999;33:340-8.<br />
83. Machiulskiene V, Nyvad B, Baelum V.<br />
Comparison of diagnostic yields of clinical<br />
and radiographic caries examinations in<br />
children of different age. Eur J Paediatr<br />
Dent 2004;5:157-62.<br />
84. Mialhe FL, Pereira AC, Pardi V, de<br />
Castro Meneghim M. Comparison of three<br />
methods for detection of carious lesions<br />
in proximal surfaces versus direct visual<br />
examination after tooth separation. J Clin<br />
Pediatr Dent 2003;28:59-62.<br />
85. Mojon P, Favre P, Chung JP, Budtz-<br />
Jörgensen E. Examiner agreement on caries<br />
detection and plaque accumulation during<br />
dental surveys of elders. Gerodontology<br />
1995;12:49-55.<br />
86. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V.<br />
Construct and predictive validity of clinical<br />
caries diagnostic criteria assessing lesion<br />
activity. J Dent Res 2003;82:117-22.<br />
87. Pitts NB, Rimmer PA. An in vivo<br />
comparison of radiographic and directly<br />
assessed clinical caries status of posterior<br />
approximal surfaces in primary and permanent<br />
teeth. Caries Res 1992;26:146-52.<br />
88. Ratledge DK, Kidd EA, Beighton D.<br />
A clinical and microbiological study of<br />
approximal carious lesions. Part 1: the relationship<br />
between cavitation, radiographic<br />
lesion depth, the site-specific gingival index<br />
and the level of infection of the dentine.<br />
Caries Res 2001;35:3-7.<br />
89. Richardson PS, McIntyre IG. The<br />
difference between clinical and bitewing<br />
detection of approximal and occlusal caries<br />
in Royal Air Force recruits. Community<br />
Dent Health 1996;13:65-9.<br />
90. Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Beighton D.<br />
Operative and microbiological validation of<br />
visual, radiographic and electronic diagnosis<br />
of occlusal caries in non-cavitated teeth<br />
judged to be in need of operative care. Br<br />
Dent J 1995;179:214-20.<br />
91. Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Wilson RF.<br />
A re-evaluation of electrical resistance<br />
measurements for the diagnosis of occlusal<br />
caries. Br Dent J 1995;178:11-7.<br />
92. Ricketts DN, Ekstrand KR, Kidd EA,<br />
Larsen T. Relating visual and radiographic<br />
ranked scoring systems for occlusal caries<br />
detection to histological and microbiological<br />
evidence. Oper Dent 2002;27:231-7.<br />
116<br />
Karies – diagnostik, riskbedömning och icke-invasiv behandling