Fulltext - SBU

Table 5.10 Excluded studies.
Author, year, reference
Children and adolescents
Aaltonen et al, 2000 [91]
Aaltonen et al, 1994 [92]
Alaluusua et al, 1983 [93]
Alanen et al, 1994 [94]
Anderson, 2002 [95]
Ashley et al, 1981 [96]
al-Shalan et al, 1997 [97]
Bader et al, 2004 [98]
Bader et al, 1986 [99]
Bader et al, 2005 [100]
Bawden et al, 1980 [101]
Benn et al, 1997 [102]
Bergman et al, 1986 [103]
Berkey et al, 1991 [104]
Bille, 1980 [105]
Birkeland et al, 1976 [106]
Bjerkeborn et al, 1987 [107]
Botha et al, 2001 [108]
Bratthall, 1997 [109]
Burt et al, 1983 [110]
Burt et al, 1988 [111]
Burt, 1993 [112]
Burt, 2005 [8]
Campus et al, 1997 [113]
Campus et al, 2000 [114]
Campus et al, 2001 [115]
Carvalho et al, 1989 [116]
Caufield et al, 1993 [117]
Chase et al, 2004 [118]
Cleaton-Jones et al, 1991 [119]
Crossner, 1981 [120]
Main reason for exclusion
Not prediction
Only correlation
Too small sample (n=39)
Too short follow-up time
Narrative review
Not prediction
Retrospective data
Review on prevention
Too short follow-up (18 months)
Predicting restorative treatment only
Effect of programme
Not answering the question
Cross-sectional study
Narrative review
Modelling data
Only associations
Cross-sectional study
Cross-sectional study
Narrative article
Longitudinal but only associations
Longitudinal but only relationships
Narrative review
Review of concepts of risk
Cross-sectional study
Cross-sectional study
Cross-sectional study
Cross-sectional study
Not prediction
Correlations only
Cross-sectional study
Too short follow-up (15 months)
The table continues on the next page
302
Karies – diagnostik, riskbedömning och icke-invasiv behandling