19.11.2014 Views

Fulltext - SBU

Fulltext - SBU

Fulltext - SBU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Predictor<br />

variables<br />

Validating<br />

criteria<br />

Incidence/increment<br />

Statist<br />

ical methods<br />

Results<br />

Sensitivity<br />

and specificity<br />

Study<br />

quality and<br />

relevance<br />

Comments<br />

Root DFS at<br />

baseline, root<br />

fillings, regular<br />

dental attendee,<br />

number of teeth,<br />

attachment loss,<br />

flossing frequency,<br />

ability<br />

to pay, 65 yrs<br />

or older<br />

≥1 new root<br />

DS or ≥1<br />

new filling<br />

(F) or both<br />

Proportion<br />

high risk:<br />

Not stated<br />

(After<br />

2 yrs)<br />

Mean incidence:<br />

root<br />

DS=0.7;<br />

root<br />

DFS=1.0<br />

36% developed<br />

≥1<br />

new DFS<br />

≥1 new<br />

root D:<br />

17%<br />

≥1 new<br />

root F:<br />

14%<br />

≥1 root<br />

D+F: 5%<br />

Log regression,<br />

OR<br />

Significant<br />

OR for ≥1<br />

new root DS<br />

Active root<br />

decay at<br />

baseline:<br />

3.6<br />

9–16 teeth<br />

at baseline:<br />

3.0<br />

17–24 teeth<br />

at baseline:<br />

1.9<br />

≥34% of<br />

teeth with<br />

attachment<br />

loss<br />

+4 mm:<br />

2.9–3.1<br />

Flossing at<br />

least daily:<br />

0.3–0.5<br />

Not able<br />

to pay: 2.5<br />

Medium<br />

Se, Sp not<br />

reported<br />

The table continues on the next page<br />

KAPITEL 5 • Riskbedömning<br />

273

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!