Fulltext - SBU

Table 5.10 continued
Author, year, reference
Demers et al, 1990 [121]
Disney et al, 1992 [122]
Dodds et al, 1995 [123]
Douglass, 1998 [124]
Downer, 1978 [125]
Downer, 1978 [126]
Drake et al, 1994 [127]
Dummer et al, 1990 [128]
Ekstrand et al, 1998 [129]
Erickson et al, 1999 [130]
Frencken et al, 1992 [131]
Federation Dentaire Internationale
1988 [132]
Fyffe et al, 2000 [133]
Granath et al, 1978 [134]
Granath et al, 1978 [135]
Graves et al, 1991 [136]
Graves, et al, 1990 [137]
Grindefjord et al, 1995 [138]
Grytten et al, 1988 [139]
Habibian et al, 2001 [140]
Helfenstein et al, 1991 [141]
Heller et al, 2000 [142]
Helm et al, 1990 [143]
Hill et al, 1967 [144]
Hintze, 1997 [145]
Holbrook et al, 1995 [146]
Holst et al, 1997 [147]
Honkala et al, 1984 [148]
Hunter, 1988 [149]
Hujoel et al, 1995 [150]
Hujoel et al, 1999 [151]
Main reason for exclusion
Narrative review
Not prediction
Narrative review
Methodology
Correlations only
Narrative review
Too short follow-up (18 months)
Covariance analysis, not prediction
Only associations
In vitro study
Not prediction
Narrative review
Not prediction
Not prediction
Modelling data
Not prediction
Narrative review
Cross-sectional analysis
Only associations calculated
Caries not outcome measure
Statistical modelling of data
Outcome measure = treatment
Correlations only
Not applicable (before fluor toothpaste
was introduced)
Retrospective, serious systematic bias likely
Bivariate associations only
Diagnostic criteria not described
Cross-sectional study
Narrative review
Not prediction
Not prediction
The table continues on the next page
KAPITEL 5 • Riskbedömning
303