19.11.2014 Views

Fulltext - SBU

Fulltext - SBU

Fulltext - SBU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Predictor<br />

variables<br />

Validating<br />

criteria<br />

Statistical<br />

methods<br />

Results<br />

Sensitivity and specificity<br />

Study<br />

quality<br />

and relevance<br />

Comments<br />

Baseline DMFS,<br />

plaque score,<br />

MS, LB, Candida,<br />

Veilonella<br />

in saliva, Snyder<br />

colorimetric test,<br />

salivary buffer<br />

(SB), salivary<br />

flow rate (SR)<br />

>14 DMFS<br />

>2 DS<br />

≥10 6 MS<br />

≥10 5 LB<br />

≥10 2 candida<br />

Proportion<br />

high risk:<br />

25–42%<br />

Correlation<br />

Se, Sp<br />

Best model for combined DMFS,<br />

LB and Veilonella<br />

Se: 71% (95% CI 61–78);<br />

Sp: 74% (95% CI 70–78)<br />

(proportion high risk: 39%)<br />

Single best predictor DS score<br />

Se: 54%; Sp: 72% (proportion<br />

high risk: 38%)<br />

High<br />

Possible<br />

bias from<br />

fluoride<br />

toothpaste<br />

use<br />

Next best single predictor<br />

LB<br />

Se: 40%; Sp: 83% (proportion<br />

high risk: 25%)<br />

MS<br />

Se: 48%; Sp: 68% (proportion<br />

high risk: 38%)<br />

Salivary flow rate not significant.<br />

Salivary flow rate,<br />

salivary buffer did not<br />

contribute to the model<br />

BW added little to the<br />

prediction compared<br />

with clinical exam only<br />

The table continues on the next page<br />

KAPITEL 5 • Riskbedömning<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!