23.02.2013 Views

theoryofliteratu00inwell

theoryofliteratu00inwell

theoryofliteratu00inwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

33 2 Notes [pp. 200-20J<br />

ment, cf. Puttenham's Arte of English Poesie (ed. Willcock and<br />

Walker), Cambridge, 1936.<br />

24. Karl Biihler, Sprachtheorie, Jena, 1934, p. 343; Stephen J. Brown,<br />

The World of Imagery, p. 149 ff., and Roman Jakobson, "Randbemerkungen<br />

zur Prosa des Dichters Pasternak," Slavische Rundschau,<br />

VII (1935), PP- 357-73-<br />

25. D. S. Mirsky, "Walt Whitman: Poet of American Democracy," Critics<br />

Group Dialectics, No. 1, 1937, pp. 11-29.<br />

26. G. Campbell, Philosophy of Rhetoric, London, 1776, pp. 3 2 1, 326.<br />

27. Richards, Philosophy of Rhetoric, London, 1936, p. 117, calls Camp-<br />

bell's first type the "verbal metaphor," for he holds that literary<br />

metaphor is not a verbal linkage but a transaction between contexts, an<br />

analogy between objects.<br />

28. Cf. Milman Parry, "The Traditional Metaphor in Homer," Classical<br />

Philology, XXVIII (1933), pp. 30-43. Parry makes clear Aristotle's<br />

unhistoric identification of Homer's metaphorism with that of later<br />

poets; compares Homer's "fixed metaphors" to those of Old English<br />

poets and (more restrictedly) to those of eighteenth-century Augustans.<br />

29. Cf, C. Bally, Traite de stylistique frangaise, Heidelberg, 1 909, Vol.<br />

I, p. 184 ff.: "La langage figure." On pp. 194-5, Bally, speaking<br />

not as a literary theorist but as a linguist, classifies metaphors as:<br />

"Images concretes, saisies par l'imagination, images affectives, saisies<br />

par une operation intellectuelle. . . ." His three categories I should<br />

call (1) poetic metaphor; (2) ritual ("fixed") metaphor; and (3) lin-<br />

guistic (etymological, or buried) metaphor.<br />

30. For a defense of ritual metaphor and guild images in the style of<br />

Milton, cf. C. S. Lewis, Preface to Paradise Lost, London, 1942,<br />

pp. 39 ff.<br />

31. Cf. Heinz Werner, Die Urspriinge der Metapher, Leipzig, 191 9.<br />

32. Hermann Pongs, Das Bild in der Dichtung. I: Versuch einer Mor-<br />

phologie der metaphorischen Formen. Marburg, 1927. II: Vorunter-<br />

suchungen zum Symbol. Marburg, 1939.<br />

33. L. B. Osborn, The . . . Writings of John Hoskyns, New Haven, 1937,<br />

p. 125; George Campbell, Philosophy of Rhetoric, pp. 335-7; A. Pope,<br />

The Art of Sinking; A. Dion, UArt d'ecrire, Quebec, 191 1, pp.<br />

1 1 1-2.<br />

34. Thomas Gibbons, Rhetoric . . . , London, 1767, pp. 15-16.<br />

35. John Dryden, Essays (ed. W. P. Ker), Oxford, 1 900, Vol. I, p. 247<br />

("Dedication of The Spanish Friar").<br />

36. Cf. I. A. Richards, Philosophy of Rhetoric, London, 1936, pp. 117-<br />

18: "A very broad division may be made between metaphors which<br />

work through some direct resemblance between the two things, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!