23.02.2013 Views

theoryofliteratu00inwell

theoryofliteratu00inwell

theoryofliteratu00inwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Preface<br />

The naming of this book has been more than ordinarily difficult.<br />

Even a proper "short title," "Theory of Literature and<br />

Methodology of Literary Study," would be too cumbersome.<br />

Before the nineteenth century one might have managed, for then<br />

a full, analytic title could have covered the title-page while the<br />

spine bore the inscription "Literature."<br />

We have written a book which, so far as we know, lacks any<br />

close parallel. It is not a textbook introducing the young to the<br />

elements of literary appreciation nor (like Morize's Aims and<br />

Methods) a survey of the techniques employed in scholarly<br />

research. Some continuity it may claim with Poetics and Rhetoric<br />

(from Aristotle down through Blair, Campbell, and<br />

Karnes), systematic treatments of the genres of belles-lettres and<br />

stylistics, or with books called Principles of Literary Criticism.<br />

But we have sought to unite "poetics" (or literary theory) and<br />

"criticism" (evaluation of literature) with "scholarship" ("re-<br />

search") and "literary history" (the "dynamics" of literature,<br />

in contrast to the "statics" of theory and criticism). It comes<br />

nearer to certain German and Russian works, Walzel's Gehalt<br />

und Gestalt, or Julius Petersen's Die Wissenschajt von der<br />

Dichtungy or Tomashevsky's Literary Theory. In contrast to the<br />

Germans, however, we have avoided mere reproductions of the<br />

views of others and, though we take into account other perspec-<br />

tives and methods, have written from a consistent point of view;<br />

in contrast to Tomashevsky, we do not undertake to give elementary<br />

instruction on such topics as prosody. We are not<br />

eclectic like the Germans or doctrinaire like the Russian.<br />

By the standards of older American scholarship, there is some-<br />

thing grandiose and even "unscholarly" about the very attempt<br />

to formulate the assumptions on which literary study is con-<br />

ducted (to do which one must go beyond "facts") and something<br />

presumptuous in our effort to survey and evaluate highly special-<br />

ized investigations. Every specialist will unavoidably be dissatis-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!