28.02.2013 Views

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

autologous blood and marrow transplantation - Blog Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Autologous vs. Unrelated Allogeneic<br />

Bone Marrow Transplantation (AlloBMT)<br />

for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)<br />

Michael W. Boyer, Andrew M. Yeager<br />

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The treatment of choice in patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia<br />

(ALL) is allogeneic bone <strong>marrow</strong> <strong>transplantation</strong> (alloBMT) from an HLAmatched<br />

sibling donor (MSD). The event-free survival after MSD BMT for ALL<br />

ranges from 30 to 65% <strong>and</strong> depends on the disease status of the patient. Relapse<br />

remains the major cause of failure of MSD BMT for ALL. The presence of acute<br />

graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) greatly influences post-BMT relapse; in MSD BMT<br />

for first-remission ALL, the risk of relapse is decreased by a factor of 2.77 in<br />

patients with acute GVHD compared with those without GVHD. However, the<br />

graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) benefit of acute GVHD does not always translate into<br />

improved event-free survival after MSD BMT because of GVHD-related mortality.<br />

Since most patients with high-risk ALL lack MSDs, alternative hematopoietic cell<br />

transplants have been explored. Autologous BMT (autoBMT) with <strong>marrow</strong><br />

harvested in remission <strong>and</strong> usually treated ex vivo (e.g., with monoclonal<br />

antibodies) is generally well tolerated but is associated with high relapse rates in<br />

most series. A comparison of autoBMT <strong>and</strong> allogeneic MSD BMT for high risk<br />

ALL showed no statistically significant difference in event-free survival but<br />

substantial differences in relapse rates: 79% in autoBMT, 75% in MSD BMT with<br />

no GVHD, <strong>and</strong> only 37% in MSD BMT with GVHD. Quantitative analysis of<br />

clonogenic ALL cell content in the harvested <strong>marrow</strong> of autoBMT recipients<br />

suggests that, as with alloBMT for ALL, the failure to eradicate residual leukemia<br />

in vivo is the biggest obstacle to improving event-free survival after autoBMT for<br />

ALL. BMT from volunteer unrelated donors (UDs) is another alternative in highrisk<br />

ALL. Event-free survival after UD BMT for ALL ranges from 12 to 43%;<br />

these results are comparable to autoBMT in patients with first-remission ALL <strong>and</strong><br />

superior to autoBMT in patients beyond first remission. In UD BMT, the major<br />

cause of failure is a high rate (50 to 70%) of transplant-related mortality. In<br />

contrast, the relapse rate after UD BMT for ALL is relatively low; after oneantigen-mismatched<br />

UD BMT, the relapse rate is 38% of that observed after MSD<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!